Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 23, 2013, 07:43:33 pm
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2010 Elections
2010 Senatorial Election Polls
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
8
9
Author
Topic: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS (Read 13227 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
Posts: 27978
Political Matrix
E: 2.84, S: 0.00
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 43 (10/17-10/20) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 19 DROPS
«
Reply #100 on:
October 23, 2010, 08:55:13 pm »
Quote from: Where's Hamilton? on October 23, 2010, 08:52:20 pm
Day 5 Muhlenberg Tracker
Toomey: 46%(+1)
Sestak: 43%(+1)
http://www.mcall.com/news/local/elections/
This can be entered in the polling database. Nothing else until 23rd drops off.
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
Posts: 4543
Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #101 on:
October 23, 2010, 09:09:17 pm »
Quote from: cinyc on October 21, 2010, 09:48:08 pm
Quote from: The Vorlon on October 21, 2010, 08:58:42 pm
Quote from: Ed Miliband for Prime Minister! on October 20, 2010, 03:44:25 am
Hmmmm, there seems to have been an avalanche of 'interesting' polls in the past day or so.
Everybody and there dog will be releasing a poll in the next ten days.
Colleges, Universities, Newspapers, Zoltan The Magnificent, Pete's All Beef Double Cheeseburger poll, Zogby, The Psychic Hotline....
The list of crap will get very thick and deep....
But are Zogby's polls more or less reliable than those by Zoltan The Magnificent or the Psychic Hotline?
Pete's all beef Double Cheeseburger poll actually has a pretty decent record.....
Logged
No man's liberty is safe while Congress is in session...
Thomas Jefferson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou_SEj1Epresidential
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 43 (10/17-10/20) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 19 DROPS
«
Reply #102 on:
October 23, 2010, 09:51:59 pm »
Quote from: Umengus on October 23, 2010, 01:19:32 pm
Quote from: Smash255 on October 23, 2010, 12:03:24 pm
Quote from: Umengus on October 23, 2010, 08:40:03 am
Quote from: Tender Branson on October 23, 2010, 05:24:03 am
Quote from: Umengus on October 23, 2010, 04:50:53 am
Toomey stays the favourite because dems are overrepresented in polls like PPP and Mulhenberg. But I agree with Rasmussen: sestak has cut the toomey lead in solidifying his base.
The 2 polls are actually miles apart when it comes to party registration:
Muhlenberg has 49% Republicans and 46% Democrats.
PPP has 48% Democrats and 41% Republicans.
By average it's 47% Democrats and 45% Republicans. While the Exit Poll will certainly show less Democrats and Republicans and more Independents, the 2% average lead for the Democrats should be OK, also in the Exit Poll.
The first muhlenberg had 46-46. Change the party id and, oh surprise !, the final result is changed...
Problem for dems is that indep will vote in large margin for toomey. Hence, overpolling dems and underpolling ind give a fake advantage to Sestak, even if the gap between dems and rep is correct.
What makes you think is oversampling of Dems?? The Democrats have a rather large registration advantage in PA (51-37 at the end of 09). Even if you take into consideration party id not always matching registration, and stronger GOP turnout than Democratic turnout (Muhlenberg btw asks registration not ID) I don't see how you can really say the party id in the polls is off.
DO you think that 46 % of the voters will be democrats ?
Better chance of that happening than 49% Republican, considering registration is 51-37 in the favor of Democrats.
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21020
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 DROPS
«
Reply #103 on:
October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm »
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Have they released the day 4 pdf yet?
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
tokar
Sr. Member
Posts: 499
Political Matrix
E: -9.87, S: -6.87
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 DROPS
«
Reply #104 on:
October 23, 2010, 11:18:50 pm »
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Have they released the day 4 pdf yet?
I can't find it, only day 3 is on Muhlenberg's website. It is always so hard to find them.
Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36284
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #105 on:
October 23, 2010, 11:25:13 pm »
Probably safe to say that Toomey is up by about 2-4%. Hopefully Sestak closes well, he has before.
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21020
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 DROPS
«
Reply #106 on:
October 23, 2010, 11:26:40 pm »
Quote from: tokar on October 23, 2010, 11:18:50 pm
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Have they released the day 4 pdf yet?
I can't find it, only day 3 is on Muhlenberg's website. It is always so hard to find them.
I waisted an hour myself looking for it.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49383
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #107 on:
October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am »
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49383
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #108 on:
October 24, 2010, 12:20:07 am »
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 11:26:40 pm
Quote from: tokar on October 23, 2010, 11:18:50 pm
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Have they released the day 4 pdf yet?
I can't find it, only day 3 is on Muhlenberg's website. It is always so hard to find them.
I waisted an hour myself looking for it.
It's on the right hand side of their Politics page but it seems like their Twitter account is updated before the website.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #109 on:
October 24, 2010, 01:55:12 am »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:20:07 am
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 11:26:40 pm
Quote from: tokar on October 23, 2010, 11:18:50 pm
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Have they released the day 4 pdf yet?
I can't find it, only day 3 is on Muhlenberg's website. It is always so hard to find them.
I waisted an hour myself looking for it.
It's on the right hand side of their Politics page but it seems like their Twitter account is updated before the website.
The update is on the website for the results, but they were talking about the PDF file with the cross tabs.
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #110 on:
October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Senator MaxQue
MaxQue
YaBB God
Posts: 6548
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #111 on:
October 24, 2010, 02:29:25 am »
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
Rhode Island is around two-thirds Catholic.
Logged
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #112 on:
October 24, 2010, 02:34:52 am »
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
NY, NJ, CT, RI, MA,VT, NH, CA & NM Catholic is the largest group.
http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gnoreligion/flash.htm
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #113 on:
October 24, 2010, 02:47:14 am »
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 02:34:52 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
NY, NJ, CT, RI, MA,VT, NH, CA & NM Catholic is the largest group.
http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gnoreligion/flash.htm
You're not adding up the individual Protestant groups. They add up to more than the Catholics do in New York, New Jersey, etc. (unless all the "others" are non-Protestant Christians, which they most likely are)
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #114 on:
October 24, 2010, 03:08:13 am »
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:47:14 am
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 02:34:52 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
NY, NJ, CT, RI, MA,VT, NH, CA & NM Catholic is the largest group.
http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gnoreligion/flash.htm
You're not adding up the individual Protestant groups. They add up to more than the Catholics do in New York, New Jersey, etc. (unless all the "others" are non-Protestant Christians, which they most likely are)
I'm guessing you flunked Math.....
Logged
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
Posts: 21522
Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 DROPS
«
Reply #115 on:
October 24, 2010, 03:11:02 am »
Is it me or do the numbers for New York in that link only add up to 93%?
Logged
Farewell to a legend:
r
(x,y) != <-y,x>
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 DROPS
«
Reply #116 on:
October 24, 2010, 03:14:29 am »
Quote from: Darth PiT, Imperial Speaker on October 24, 2010, 03:11:02 am
Is it me or do the numbers for New York in that link only add up to 93%?
It is 93%, keep in mind you have some that are less than .5% that don't show up, that brings you into the 95 or 96% range, rest could be due to rounding. It looks like its the same in most states.
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #117 on:
October 24, 2010, 04:37:14 am »
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 03:08:13 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:47:14 am
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 02:34:52 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
NY, NJ, CT, RI, MA,VT, NH, CA & NM Catholic is the largest group.
http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gnoreligion/flash.htm
You're not adding up the individual Protestant groups. They add up to more than the Catholics do in New York, New Jersey, etc. (unless all the "others" are non-Protestant Christians, which they most likely are)
I'm guessing you flunked Math.....
Lets do the Math then:
100% -38% (Catholic) - 13% (Non-religious) - 5% (Jewish) - 1% (Buddist) - 2% (Islam) -2% (other--see below) = 39% (all other minor religions listed were Protestant or Christian in nature, and I'm willing to bet at least half the "other" is small protestant churches)
39%>38%. Epic problem-solving fail on your part
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #118 on:
October 24, 2010, 01:25:55 pm »
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 04:37:14 am
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 03:08:13 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:47:14 am
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 02:34:52 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
NY, NJ, CT, RI, MA,VT, NH, CA & NM Catholic is the largest group.
http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gnoreligion/flash.htm
You're not adding up the individual Protestant groups. They add up to more than the Catholics do in New York, New Jersey, etc. (unless all the "others" are non-Protestant Christians, which they most likely are)
I'm guessing you flunked Math.....
Lets do the Math then:
100% -38% (Catholic) - 13% (Non-religious) - 5% (Jewish) - 1% (Buddist) - 2% (Islam) -2% (other--see below) = 39% (all other minor religions listed were Protestant or Christian in nature, and I'm willing to bet at least half the "other" is small protestant churches)
39%>38%. Epic problem-solving fail on your part
Others does not exactly mean Protestant, nor does simply saying Christian, nor does Non-Denominational ,
Baptist 7%
Methodist 6%
Lutheran 2%
Presbyterian 2%
Protestant (no Denomination given) 2%
Pentecostal 2%
Anglican 2%
Assemblies of God 1%
Evangelical 1%
Thats 25%, now if you add all of Christian (4%) thats 29% and all of others,4%, that is 33%. Rounding might bring it up slightly higher, but not higher than 38%, and not all of Christians or Others are Protestant.
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #119 on:
October 24, 2010, 01:58:46 pm »
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 01:25:55 pm
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 04:37:14 am
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 03:08:13 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:47:14 am
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 02:34:52 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
NY, NJ, CT, RI, MA,VT, NH, CA & NM Catholic is the largest group.
http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gnoreligion/flash.htm
You're not adding up the individual Protestant groups. They add up to more than the Catholics do in New York, New Jersey, etc. (unless all the "others" are non-Protestant Christians, which they most likely are)
I'm guessing you flunked Math.....
Lets do the Math then:
100% -38% (Catholic) - 13% (Non-religious) - 5% (Jewish) - 1% (Buddist) - 2% (Islam) -2% (other--see below) = 39% (all other minor religions listed were Protestant or Christian in nature, and I'm willing to bet at least half the "other" is small protestant churches)
39%>38%. Epic problem-solving fail on your part
Others does not exactly mean Protestant, nor does simply saying Christian, nor does Non-Denominational ,
Baptist 7%
Methodist 6%
Lutheran 2%
Presbyterian 2%
Protestant (no Denomination given) 2%
Pentecostal 2%
Anglican 2%
Assemblies of God 1%
Evangelical 1%
Thats 25%, now if you add all of Christian (4%) thats 29% and all of others,4%, that is 33%. Rounding might bring it up slightly higher, but not higher than 38%, and not all of Christians or Others are Protestant.
So the Problem is where the extra 4-5% Comes from in the poll (which we thought was probably rounding error). Odds are it goes heavily to the Protestants (as they have more denominations to be rounded off)
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #120 on:
October 24, 2010, 02:03:23 pm »
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 01:58:46 pm
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 01:25:55 pm
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 04:37:14 am
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 03:08:13 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:47:14 am
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 02:34:52 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:14:52 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 12:17:18 am
And then there were nine...
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 23, 2010, 09:59:21 pm
I thought Catholics were a majority in PA? The Muhlenberg poll has 49% of the electorate as Protestant and 33% as Catholics, as of the day three pdf.
Yeah, I think the numbers are supposed to be reversed.
When did you hear this? I'm pretty sure Protestants outnumber Catholics in every state in the US (Expect maybe Hawaii, but that doesn't count). I think they even do in New Mexico given that the state has a large population of Protestant Hispanics.
NY, NJ, CT, RI, MA,VT, NH, CA & NM Catholic is the largest group.
http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gnoreligion/flash.htm
You're not adding up the individual Protestant groups. They add up to more than the Catholics do in New York, New Jersey, etc. (unless all the "others" are non-Protestant Christians, which they most likely are)
I'm guessing you flunked Math.....
Lets do the Math then:
100% -38% (Catholic) - 13% (Non-religious) - 5% (Jewish) - 1% (Buddist) - 2% (Islam) -2% (other--see below) = 39% (all other minor religions listed were Protestant or Christian in nature, and I'm willing to bet at least half the "other" is small protestant churches)
39%>38%. Epic problem-solving fail on your part
Others does not exactly mean Protestant, nor does simply saying Christian, nor does Non-Denominational ,
Baptist 7%
Methodist 6%
Lutheran 2%
Presbyterian 2%
Protestant (no Denomination given) 2%
Pentecostal 2%
Anglican 2%
Assemblies of God 1%
Evangelical 1%
Thats 25%, now if you add all of Christian (4%) thats 29% and all of others,4%, that is 33%. Rounding might bring it up slightly higher, but not higher than 38%, and not all of Christians or Others are Protestant.
So the Problem is where the extra 4-5% Comes from in the poll (which we thought was probably rounding error). Odds are it goes heavily to the Protestants (as they have more denominations to be rounded off)
Even taking that into consideration, some the rounding could also be Jewish, or Buddhist, or Muslim, or No religion, etc
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49383
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #121 on:
October 24, 2010, 02:03:50 pm »
Guys, who cares?
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #122 on:
October 24, 2010, 02:07:52 pm »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 02:03:50 pm
Guys, who cares?
I could really careless, I just find it rather interesting he can't do basic math.
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #123 on:
October 24, 2010, 02:24:25 pm »
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 02:07:52 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 02:03:50 pm
Guys, who cares?
I could really careless, I just find it rather interesting he can't do basic math.
*Sigh. It's like banging my head against a wall here. Do you have any idea how much more likely .5% rounding error would make difference across 16 separate values (some of which round to Zero) rather than 5?
As for whether or not this matters, I agree it doesn't--I just find it odd that his understanding of math doesn't stretch beyond "38 is bigger than 37" and fails to understand basic logical analysis, and that he sees this as a failure on
my
part.
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13907
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 43/Toomey 46 (10/20-10/23) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 23 D
«
Reply #124 on:
October 24, 2010, 03:40:21 pm »
Quote from: Dgov on October 24, 2010, 02:24:25 pm
Quote from: Smash255 on October 24, 2010, 02:07:52 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 24, 2010, 02:03:50 pm
Guys, who cares?
I could really careless, I just find it rather interesting he can't do basic math.
*Sigh. It's like banging my head against a wall here. Do you have any idea how much more likely .5% rounding error would make difference across 16 separate values (some of which round to Zero) rather than 5?
As for whether or not this matters, I agree it doesn't--I just find it odd that his understanding of math doesn't stretch beyond "38 is bigger than 37" and fails to understand basic logical analysis, and that he sees this as a failure on
my
part.
Assuming that every single one that said Christian, every single one that said others are Protestant as well as assuming every single rounding error works in favor of Protestant is just plain silly and irrational.
Anyway back to the topic at hand. Tonight and the results Tuesday Night will be interesting. They are the days in which the days that swung to Toomey will drop off.
Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
8
9
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...