Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 19, 2013, 02:17:36 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2010 Elections
2010 Senatorial Election Polls
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
5
6
...
9
Author
Topic: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS (Read 13390 times)
mypalfish
Full Member
Posts: 207
PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
«
on:
October 19, 2010, 11:23:55 pm »
senatus
senatus
47 minutes ago
Muhlenberg/Morning Call poll shows Sestak up 3, 44-41
«
Last Edit: October 29, 2010, 05:26:03 pm by Sam Spade
»
Logged
sg0508
YaBB God
Posts: 880
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 1.91
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #1 on:
October 19, 2010, 11:29:21 pm »
I predicted Toomey's demise would start in August. Maybe the black vote in Philly is the difference?
Either way, the GOP is losing ground in the final weeks, just like I predicted.
CA is probably gone, WA is probably gone, CO is slipping, DE is gone, PA could be slipping, KY is slipping, MO is tightening and WI may be gone.
How we doing folks?
Logged
-Scott G
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3844
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #2 on:
October 19, 2010, 11:36:26 pm »
Is Pennsylvania seriously going to vote against Toomey?
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
Posts: 8528
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -5.22
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #3 on:
October 20, 2010, 12:43:35 am »
PPP is once again vindicated. And if anything this poll has a Republican-friendly sample.
Quote from: sg0508 on October 19, 2010, 11:29:21 pm
... and WI may be gone.
You mean it's gone for the Democrats?
Logged
Bob Findley
: "You're a real dyed-in-the-wool son-of-a-bitch. Anyone ever told you that?"
Steve Everett
: "Just close friends and family,"
Clint Eastwood's "True Crime", 1999.
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36348
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #4 on:
October 20, 2010, 12:46:13 am »
Quote from: px75 on October 20, 2010, 12:43:35 am
PPP is once again vindicated. And if anything this poll has a Republican-friendly sample.
Quote from: sg0508 on October 19, 2010, 11:29:21 pm
... and WI may be gone.
You mean it's gone for the Democrats?
No, he means it could be gone for the Republicans, hilariously. He's basically the Anti-Beet. He's actually a good counterweight to have around.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 04, 2013, 08:07:16 pm
I went to the drink fountain with the intention of getting a diet drink, but I accidentally hit the Dr Pepper lever. I didn't realize it until the cup was full.
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
Posts: 3632
Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #5 on:
October 20, 2010, 01:12:34 am »
Quote from: Eraserhead on October 20, 2010, 12:46:13 am
Quote from: px75 on October 20, 2010, 12:43:35 am
PPP is once again vindicated. And if anything this poll has a Republican-friendly sample.
Quote from: sg0508 on October 19, 2010, 11:29:21 pm
... and WI may be gone.
You mean it's gone for the Democrats?
No, he means it could be gone for the Republicans, hilariously. He's basically the Anti-Beet. He's actually a good counterweight to have around.
He's a hopeless pessimistic fool. IMHO.
Logged
In Wyoming, there are two seasons.
Winter and July.
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
Posts: 21572
Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #6 on:
October 20, 2010, 01:31:22 am »
Quote from: Tom Tancredo on October 20, 2010, 01:12:34 am
Quote from: Eraserhead on October 20, 2010, 12:46:13 am
Quote from: px75 on October 20, 2010, 12:43:35 am
PPP is once again vindicated. And if anything this poll has a Republican-friendly sample.
Quote from: sg0508 on October 19, 2010, 11:29:21 pm
... and WI may be gone.
You mean it's gone for the Democrats?
No, he means it could be gone for the Republicans, hilariously. He's basically the Anti-Beet. He's actually a good counterweight to have around.
He's a hopeless pessimistic fool. IMHO.
For someone whose first years of genuine political awareness were 2006 or 2008, the idea of Republicans actually winning may seem like a bizarre fantasy. We tend to be prejudiced towards expecting outcomes we have experienced personally, even if logic suggests other outcomes are possible or even probable.
Logged
Farewell to a legend:
r
(x,y) != <-y,x>
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13940
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #7 on:
October 20, 2010, 01:44:08 am »
Someone check on Phil.....
Logged
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13940
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #8 on:
October 20, 2010, 01:47:42 am »
http://www.mcall.com/media/acrobat/2010-10/56899431.pdf
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 28252
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #9 on:
October 20, 2010, 01:57:25 am »
Great.
I wish though that they would poll 1000 likely voters, not only 400.
Another question:
How do we add these to the database ? Every day ? Or maybe every 3 days ?
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #10 on:
October 20, 2010, 02:15:05 am »
Quote from: sg0508 on October 19, 2010, 11:29:21 pm
I predicted Toomey's demise would start in August. Maybe the black vote in Philly is the difference?
Either way, the GOP is losing ground in the final weeks, just like I predicted.
CA is probably gone, WA is probably gone, CO is slipping, DE is gone, PA could be slipping, KY is slipping, MO is tightening and WI may be gone.
How we doing folks?
HAHAHAHA. Where shall we start?
1: California is slipping for the Democrats. Fiorina is closer right now than she's ever been in this race, and looks like an even chance to pull this one off.
2: Washington is heading down to the wire. Please give me one poll in the last 3 weeks that suggests this race is "Gone". PPP themselves just released a poll with Murray up only 2--not a confidence builder for the Democrats.
3: Colorado is slipping towards Tossup. Buck has gone from about a +3 average to about even. Again, this just means a close race is going down to the wire--I don't think Buck's ever really had a big lead to begin with.
4: Delaware is gone. But seeing as who we lost, i don't really count this as a loss for anyone but the GOP big boys.
5: Pennsylvania is again, a Tossup. Do you think that the GOP can't win in any state that they don't lead by 10 in?
6: Kentucky is still Lean Paul, and likely to stay that way. This race has been closer than it is now, and I don't see any reason Paul won't be able to pull this one off
7: Missouri is going to be an R hold. You can put money on that--A PPP poll showing him up 5 basically means he's going to win barring anything really big happening.
8: Wisconsin is an easy GOP pickup. Even the DSCC poll had Johnson up a few points.
Me? I'm doing fine, thank you very much. I happen to be busting my balls trying to make sure that first race falls the right way, rather than spending all my time whining on the internet about how major political parties don't bend over backwards to please
me
.
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 28252
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #11 on:
October 20, 2010, 02:15:21 am »
Well, I´ll add this to the database and suggest that we use this thread for every release that´s coming out now.
I think it´s OK if we add the daily results to the database, because we´ll got tons of other PA polls in between.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29264
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #12 on:
October 20, 2010, 02:17:53 am »
Quote from: Dgov on October 20, 2010, 02:15:05 am
1: California is slipping for the Democrats. Fiorina is closer right now than she's ever been in this race, and looks like an even chance to pull this one off.
Fiornia was in better shape a month ago.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/forecasts/senate/california
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
Posts: 3632
Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #13 on:
October 20, 2010, 02:21:57 am »
Quote from: Dgov on October 20, 2010, 02:15:05 am
Quote from: sg0508 on October 19, 2010, 11:29:21 pm
I predicted Toomey's demise would start in August. Maybe the black vote in Philly is the difference?
Either way, the GOP is losing ground in the final weeks, just like I predicted.
CA is probably gone, WA is probably gone, CO is slipping, DE is gone, PA could be slipping, KY is slipping, MO is tightening and WI may be gone.
How we doing folks?
HAHAHAHA. Where shall we start?
1: California is slipping for the Democrats. Fiorina is closer right now than she's ever been in this race, and looks like an even chance to pull this one off.
2: Washington is heading down to the wire. Please give me one poll in the last 3 weeks that suggests this race is "Gone". PPP themselves just released a poll with Murray up only 2--not a confidence builder for the Democrats.
3: Colorado is slipping towards Tossup. Buck has gone from about a +3 average to about even. Again, this just means a close race is going down to the wire--I don't think Buck's ever really had a big lead to begin with.
4: Delaware is gone. But seeing as who we lost, i don't really count this as a loss for anyone but the GOP big boys.
5: Pennsylvania is again, a Tossup. Do you think that the GOP can't win in any state that they don't lead by 10 in?
6: Kentucky is still Lean Paul, and likely to stay that way. This race has been closer than it is now, and I don't see any reason Paul won't be able to pull this one off
7: Missouri is going to be an R hold. You can put money on that--A PPP poll showing him up 5 basically means he's going to win barring anything really big happening.
8: Wisconsin is an easy GOP pickup. Even the DSCC poll had Johnson up a few points.
Me? I'm doing fine, thank you very much. I happen to be busting my balls trying to make sure that first race falls the right way, rather than spending all my time whining on the internet about how major political parties don't bend over backwards to please
me
.
You are my new favorite member right now.
Logged
In Wyoming, there are two seasons.
Winter and July.
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
Posts: 7757
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #14 on:
October 20, 2010, 03:44:25 am »
Hmmmm, there seems to have been an avalanche of 'interesting' polls in the past day or so.
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #15 on:
October 20, 2010, 03:49:57 am »
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on October 20, 2010, 02:17:53 am
Quote from: Dgov on October 20, 2010, 02:15:05 am
1: California is slipping for the Democrats. Fiorina is closer right now than she's ever been in this race, and looks like an even chance to pull this one off.
Fiornia was in better shape a month ago.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/forecasts/senate/california
A Poll has her leading. That's a first (I think), even if it is her own internal.
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #16 on:
October 20, 2010, 03:50:49 am »
Quote from: Tom Tancredo on October 20, 2010, 02:21:57 am
You are my new favorite member right now.
uh . . Thanks?
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #17 on:
October 20, 2010, 06:59:41 am »
Best part of the poll: 49% claim to have voted for McCain while only 43% voted for Obama.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
Posts: 12058
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #18 on:
October 20, 2010, 08:16:08 am »
One thing about this race... old white voters in Pennsylvania may be swinging heavily Republican, but Toomey is a truly awful candidate for them. We've seen a lot of seniors overlook this problem with Toomey and other candidates because they want to vote against Obama, but it has always been an Achilles heel. We'll see how much it matters on election day.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
YaBB God
Posts: 18390
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #19 on:
October 20, 2010, 08:17:28 am »
so, the following races are tightening up: CA, WA, NV, CO, PA, KY, WI, WV
Goose: It's the bottom of the 9th, the score is tied. It's time for the big one.
Iceman: You up for this one, Maverick?
Maverick: Just a walk in the park, Kazansky.
Slider: Contact. Multiple bogeys. Two miles.
Logged
Do not fight with one another over my banning. I've enjoyed the time I have spent with all of you, but the time really has come for me to leave. It is what I want.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Y_GLT4_9I
I looked over Jordan, and what did I see?
Coming for to carry me home,
A band of angels coming after me,
Coming for to carry me home.
Swing low, sweet chariot,
Coming for to carry me home.
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
Posts: 7757
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #20 on:
October 20, 2010, 08:26:20 am »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 20, 2010, 06:59:41 am
Best part of the poll: 49% claim to have voted for McCain while only 43% voted for Obama.
So Sestak could be ahead by 10 or more?
Logged
Whacker77
YaBB God
Posts: 747
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #21 on:
October 20, 2010, 09:55:24 am »
Considering there have been no major events that would account for such a sudden swing, I admitt I'm confounded by the numbers. Still, two polls in a row is saying something. I will say this though. I find it very hard to believe Toomey is just at 41%.
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56719
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #22 on:
October 20, 2010, 10:40:13 am »
IIRC this race's polls always had a surprising lot of undecideds.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
Posts: 27964
Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: -6.09
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #23 on:
October 20, 2010, 10:45:32 am »
Wow, and I was slamming the Public Policy poll the other day..........yowza. I wonder if the nasty ads Sestak is running are having an affect.
Logged
Quote from: opebo on June 05, 2013, 12:35:24 pm
Have any of you impecunious and humpbacked losers ever pulled off this pretense successfully?
Quote from: VP Duke on June 11, 2013, 05:11:02 pm
Ranch pizza is great if you're white girl wasted
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21417
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/Morning Call: Sestak 44% Toomey 41%
«
Reply #24 on:
October 20, 2010, 11:02:33 am »
The two debates are still to come, correct? Who is considered the strongest of the two in debates? They could decide who wins.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
5
6
...
9
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...