Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 19, 2013, 05:11:05 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2010 Elections
2010 Senatorial Election Polls
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
[
9
]
Author
Topic: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS (Read 13391 times)
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36348
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #200 on:
October 30, 2010, 10:35:23 pm »
Nice. I'll take them.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 04, 2013, 08:07:16 pm
I went to the drink fountain with the intention of getting a diet drink, but I accidentally hit the Dr Pepper lever. I didn't realize it until the cup was full.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #201 on:
October 30, 2010, 10:45:54 pm »
Quote from: Fmr Gov, NE Rep. Polnut on October 30, 2010, 07:39:02 pm
What?
These are new numbers?
Like I said in my post...
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13940
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
«
Reply #202 on:
October 31, 2010, 12:09:55 am »
Sample Dems + 4 (48-44)
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/muhlenberg.pdf
Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36348
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #203 on:
October 31, 2010, 12:12:22 am »
Okay, maybe I won't take them.
If Sestak is still behind with that sample... well... you know... it doesn't look too good.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 04, 2013, 08:07:16 pm
I went to the drink fountain with the intention of getting a diet drink, but I accidentally hit the Dr Pepper lever. I didn't realize it until the cup was full.
Umengus
YaBB God
Posts: 1936
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #204 on:
October 31, 2010, 06:47:30 am »
Quote from: Eraserhead on October 31, 2010, 12:12:22 am
Okay, maybe I won't take them.
If Sestak is still behind with that sample... well... you know... it doesn't look too good.
It's a reason why I prefer "Party id reweighting" and so Rasmussen. The move showed by Muhlenberg doesn't exist inr reality. It's just due to the party id sample.
10/28: R+5
10/31: D +4
«
Last Edit: October 31, 2010, 06:49:55 am by Umengus
»
Logged
Re: France 2012: the official thread
« Reply #622 on: July 25, 2011, 04:44:20 pm »
Quote from: Umengus on July 25, 2011, 03:19:09 pm
against Aubry, Sarkozy will win. Aubry is a very bad candidate for prime time : no charisma, no sympathy, muslim connection, stupid ideas,... and sarkozy is a good candidate...
but against hollande, sarkozy will lose."
Censured by REALPOLITIK due to "offensive content".
"It ought to be noted that there's no freedom of speech here." xahar
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
Posts: 4543
Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #205 on:
October 31, 2010, 07:10:55 am »
Quote from: Umengus on October 31, 2010, 06:47:30 am
Quote from: Eraserhead on October 31, 2010, 12:12:22 am
Okay, maybe I won't take them.
If Sestak is still behind with that sample... well... you know... it doesn't look too good.
It's a reason why I prefer "Party id reweighting" and so Rasmussen. The move showed by Muhlenberg doesn't exist inr reality. It's just due to the party id sample.
10/28: R+5
10/31: D +4
Wow - this poll bounces around so much you'd almost think it was some tiny sample poll run by a bunch of University students or something...
Oh wait... that's exactly what it is....
But seriously...
In 2008 actual turnout in Pennsylvania was about 44/37 to the Dem side in terms of party ID. (ie Dems +7)
This poll has it Dems +4, so in terms of turnout, things have declined by only 3% for the Dems versus 2008.
Does this seem reasonable to you?
Logged
No man's liberty is safe while Congress is in session...
Thomas Jefferson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou_SEj1Epresidential
Umengus
YaBB God
Posts: 1936
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #206 on:
October 31, 2010, 10:59:33 am »
Quote from: The Vorlon on October 31, 2010, 07:10:55 am
Quote from: Umengus on October 31, 2010, 06:47:30 am
Quote from: Eraserhead on October 31, 2010, 12:12:22 am
Okay, maybe I won't take them.
If Sestak is still behind with that sample... well... you know... it doesn't look too good.
It's a reason why I prefer "Party id reweighting" and so Rasmussen. The move showed by Muhlenberg doesn't exist inr reality. It's just due to the party id sample.
10/28: R+5
10/31: D +4
Wow - this poll bounces around so much you'd almost think it was some tiny sample poll run by a bunch of University students or something...
Oh wait... that's exactly what it is....
But seriously...
In 2008 actual turnout in Pennsylvania was about 44/37 to the Dem side in terms of party ID. (ie Dems +7)
This poll has it Dems +4, so in terms of turnout, things have declined by only 3% for the Dems versus 2008.
Does this seem reasonable to you?
no but every dems say that the PA dem party has a very strong GOTV effort. We will see...
2006: exit poll: D:43 % R: 38 % I: 19 % (D +5)
if 2010 = 2006 , where is the wave ?
Logged
Re: France 2012: the official thread
« Reply #622 on: July 25, 2011, 04:44:20 pm »
Quote from: Umengus on July 25, 2011, 03:19:09 pm
against Aubry, Sarkozy will win. Aubry is a very bad candidate for prime time : no charisma, no sympathy, muslim connection, stupid ideas,... and sarkozy is a good candidate...
but against hollande, sarkozy will lose."
Censured by REALPOLITIK due to "offensive content".
"It ought to be noted that there's no freedom of speech here." xahar
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13940
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #207 on:
October 31, 2010, 12:50:20 pm »
Quote from: The Vorlon on October 31, 2010, 07:10:55 am
Quote from: Umengus on October 31, 2010, 06:47:30 am
Quote from: Eraserhead on October 31, 2010, 12:12:22 am
Okay, maybe I won't take them.
If Sestak is still behind with that sample... well... you know... it doesn't look too good.
It's a reason why I prefer "Party id reweighting" and so Rasmussen. The move showed by Muhlenberg doesn't exist inr reality. It's just due to the party id sample.
10/28: R+5
10/31: D +4
Wow - this poll bounces around so much you'd almost think it was some tiny sample poll run by a bunch of University students or something...
Oh wait... that's exactly what it is....
But seriously...
In 2008 actual turnout in Pennsylvania was about 44/37 to the Dem side in terms of party ID. (ie Dems +7)
This poll has it Dems +4, so in terms of turnout, things have declined by only 3% for the Dems versus 2008.
Does this seem reasonable to you?
Considering its PA? Yes. Also the question is Party registration not party ID. Party registration is actually Dems +14.
Logged
mypalfish
Full Member
Posts: 207
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
«
Reply #208 on:
October 31, 2010, 07:45:26 pm »
Toomey up 4 in the last tracking poll....
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #209 on:
October 31, 2010, 07:46:06 pm »
Toomey - 48%
Sestak - 44%
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Umengus
YaBB God
Posts: 1936
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
«
Reply #210 on:
October 31, 2010, 08:31:22 pm »
Game over ?
Logged
Re: France 2012: the official thread
« Reply #622 on: July 25, 2011, 04:44:20 pm »
Quote from: Umengus on July 25, 2011, 03:19:09 pm
against Aubry, Sarkozy will win. Aubry is a very bad candidate for prime time : no charisma, no sympathy, muslim connection, stupid ideas,... and sarkozy is a good candidate...
but against hollande, sarkozy will lose."
Censured by REALPOLITIK due to "offensive content".
"It ought to be noted that there's no freedom of speech here." xahar
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36348
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #211 on:
October 31, 2010, 09:00:55 pm »
Quote from: Umengus on October 31, 2010, 08:31:22 pm
Game over ?
Is +4 really that different from +2?
Toomey is a strong favorite but we already knew that.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 04, 2013, 08:07:16 pm
I went to the drink fountain with the intention of getting a diet drink, but I accidentally hit the Dr Pepper lever. I didn't realize it until the cup was full.
Smash255
YaBB God
Posts: 13940
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
«
Reply #212 on:
November 01, 2010, 02:05:16 am »
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/2010TrackingRelease13November1.doc.pdf
Dem +2
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 28255
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS
«
Reply #213 on:
November 01, 2010, 10:33:23 am »
Was this their final poll ?
Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36348
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #214 on:
November 01, 2010, 10:34:22 am »
Quote from: Tender Branson on November 01, 2010, 10:33:23 am
Was this their final poll ?
I read that it was on Politicalwire earlier.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on June 04, 2013, 08:07:16 pm
I went to the drink fountain with the intention of getting a diet drink, but I accidentally hit the Dr Pepper lever. I didn't realize it until the cup was full.
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 28255
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #215 on:
November 01, 2010, 10:51:47 am »
Quote from: Eraserhead on November 01, 2010, 10:34:22 am
Quote from: Tender Branson on November 01, 2010, 10:33:23 am
Was this their final poll ?
I read that it was on Politicalwire earlier.
Guess I have to enter this too then ...
Meh, so much work.
Logged
Umengus
YaBB God
Posts: 1936
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #216 on:
November 01, 2010, 01:40:20 pm »
Quote from: Tender Branson on November 01, 2010, 10:51:47 am
Quote from: Eraserhead on November 01, 2010, 10:34:22 am
Quote from: Tender Branson on November 01, 2010, 10:33:23 am
Was this their final poll ?
I read that it was on Politicalwire earlier.
Guess I have to enter this too then ...
Meh, so much work.
thanks for your work. especially today.
Logged
Re: France 2012: the official thread
« Reply #622 on: July 25, 2011, 04:44:20 pm »
Quote from: Umengus on July 25, 2011, 03:19:09 pm
against Aubry, Sarkozy will win. Aubry is a very bad candidate for prime time : no charisma, no sympathy, muslim connection, stupid ideas,... and sarkozy is a good candidate...
but against hollande, sarkozy will lose."
Censured by REALPOLITIK due to "offensive content".
"It ought to be noted that there's no freedom of speech here." xahar
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 28255
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 D
«
Reply #217 on:
November 02, 2010, 01:18:57 am »
Quote from: Umengus on November 01, 2010, 01:40:20 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on November 01, 2010, 10:51:47 am
Quote from: Eraserhead on November 01, 2010, 10:34:22 am
Quote from: Tender Branson on November 01, 2010, 10:33:23 am
Was this their final poll ?
I read that it was on Politicalwire earlier.
Guess I have to enter this too then ...
Meh, so much work.
thanks for your work. especially today.
No problem ...
Logged
Pages:
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
[
9
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...