PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:26:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA: Muhlenberg/MC: Sestak 40/Toomey 48 (10/24-10/27) DO NOT ENTER UNTIL 27 DROPS  (Read 102801 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« on: October 20, 2010, 02:17:53 AM »
Quote from: Dgov on October 20, 2010, 02:15:05 AM
1:  California is slipping for the Democrats.  Fiorina is closer right now than she's ever been in this race, and looks like an even chance to pull this one off.


Fiornia was in better shape a month ago.

http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/forecasts/senate/california
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2010, 12:19:55 PM »
« Edited: October 20, 2010, 12:21:54 PM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »
Quote from: Dgov on October 20, 2010, 03:49:57 AM
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on October 20, 2010, 02:17:53 AM
Quote from: Dgov on October 20, 2010, 02:15:05 AM
1:  California is slipping for the Democrats.  Fiorina is closer right now than she's ever been in this race, and looks like an even chance to pull this one off.


Fiornia was in better shape a month ago.

http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/forecasts/senate/california


A Poll has her leading.  That's a first (I think), even if it is her own internal.

She led in multiple polls a month and a half ago. My link has a +1 Rasmussen and a +2 SUSA for her.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2010, 10:02:57 PM »
Quote from: I have never seen a sadder star fall from the sky on October 20, 2010, 09:59:40 PM
If I were Sestak, I would definitely be running Toomey = Santorum ads.

Naw, he shouldn't implky that Toomey is that same as someone that liberal.

Lifetime ACU ratings:

Santorum 88
Toomey 97
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2010, 10:27:50 PM »
Quote from: Dgov on October 20, 2010, 10:27:01 PM
It's a mistake to think Santorum lost only because he was "too extreme" for Pennsylvania.  Moderate Republican Icon Mike DeWine lost in Neighboring Ohio by only a slightly smaller margin, and Ohio is slightly more Republican.

Maybe Sherrod Brown doesn't suck as much as Bob Casey?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.