1984 Presidential Election (by congressional district)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:39:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1984 Presidential Election (by congressional district)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Author Topic: 1984 Presidential Election (by congressional district)  (Read 26550 times)
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 22, 2010, 08:15:21 PM »
« edited: October 22, 2010, 08:17:44 PM by Pacific Justice Mr. Fuzzleton »

Louisiana





Mondale carried the 2nd District (which covered most of New Orleans) with 62% of the vote, was only 1% away from carrying the 8th District (in the center of the state) and hit 40% in the 7th District (the Southwestern portion of Louisiana).

Reagan's best performance was in the 1st District (directly above the 2nd) where he carried 77% of the vote.  
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 22, 2010, 10:46:19 PM »

This is pretty impressive, Fuzzy.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 22, 2010, 10:48:37 PM »


Thanks!  Smiley
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 22, 2010, 10:56:03 PM »

Missouri





Mondale carried the 1st district (St. Louis) with 63% of the vote, and the 5th district (Kansas City) cith 54% of the vote.

Reagan recieved 60%+ in every other district.  
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 23, 2010, 02:42:58 AM »


Indeed, districts seem considerably more sound than they are as of now.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 23, 2010, 07:53:20 AM »

Alabama



There were no close districts whatsoever.  

But there wern't any 70%+ Reagan districts either.

Was any district majority-black?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 23, 2010, 08:21:28 AM »

Alabama



There were no close districts whatsoever. 

But there wern't any 70%+ Reagan districts either.

Was any district majority-black?

I've read somewhere that the "blcak majority district" doctrine emerged during the 1991 redistricting (the author cited it as a cause of the Republican comeback in the House from 1994 to 2006, but he also has mades a series of predictions that were proved wrong so I don't take it for granted).
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 23, 2010, 12:28:35 PM »
« Edited: October 23, 2010, 12:34:03 PM by Pacific Justice Mr. Fuzzleton »

Alabama



There were no close districts whatsoever.  

But there wern't any 70%+ Reagan districts either.

Was any district majority-black?

Nope.    Some districts were 30% black or so, but no more.  
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: October 23, 2010, 12:34:31 PM »

New Jersey is on the way!  Smiley
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: October 23, 2010, 03:48:32 PM »

New Jersey

 



Mondale carried New Jersey's 10th district (Newark and some suburbs) and lost the 14th (Jersey City and suburbs) by a 6% margin.  The 1st district went to Reagan by a 10% margin (it contained the cities of Camden and Pennsauken, which are right across the river from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: October 23, 2010, 04:52:21 PM »

Cool maps.

If you're confused about any boundaries, WWU has maps for old districts. Though that would admittedly be time-consuming. Wink
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,144


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: October 23, 2010, 06:07:25 PM »

Alabama



There were no close districts whatsoever. 

But there wern't any 70%+ Reagan districts either.

Was any district majority-black?

I've read somewhere that the "blcak majority district" doctrine emerged during the 1991 redistricting (the author cited it as a cause of the Republican comeback in the House from 1994 to 2006, but he also has mades a series of predictions that were proved wrong so I don't take it for granted).


It comes from the Supreme Court's interpretation of Section 2 of the VRA from Thornburg v. Gingles which was in 1986. So yes, it would have first applied in the redistricting after this election, even though the relevant law was of course passed in the 1960's.

Very interesting thread, just noticed it.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: October 23, 2010, 06:10:10 PM »

Nice maps, Fuzzy.

As expected, it appears the maps reflect economic interests a lot more than social interests.

Cool maps.

If you're confused about any boundaries, WWU has maps for old districts. Though that would admittedly be time-consuming. Wink

Online? If so, please give link.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: October 23, 2010, 10:21:07 PM »

Nice maps, Fuzzy.

As expected, it appears the maps reflect economic interests a lot more than social interests.

Cool maps.

If you're confused about any boundaries, WWU has maps for old districts. Though that would admittedly be time-consuming. Wink

Online? If so, please give link.

No, unfortunately, hence the time-consuming comment. Smiley
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: October 23, 2010, 11:50:05 PM »

Nice maps, Fuzzy.

As expected, it appears the maps reflect economic interests a lot more than social interests.

Cool maps.

If you're confused about any boundaries, WWU has maps for old districts. Though that would admittedly be time-consuming. Wink

Online? If so, please give link.

No, unfortunately, hence the time-consuming comment. Smiley

Well I'll certainly look into it.  Thanks bgwah  Smiley
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,776


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: October 23, 2010, 11:57:43 PM »

A great Washington resource on past districts is here, specifically pages 161-177. Another good one is here.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: October 24, 2010, 12:37:36 AM »

This is certainly interesting. Is PA, NY, and MA coming soon?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: October 24, 2010, 05:59:10 AM »

Nice.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: October 24, 2010, 08:47:31 AM »

Great thread; I've never seen detailed maps of 80s congressional districts for most of those states.
Logged
JoeyJoeJoe
Rookie
**
Posts: 230
Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: October 25, 2010, 05:20:30 PM »

By the way, I literally had to re-draw some of these districts, so they arn't perfect, but they are pretty good.  Most of them were drawn based on county lines anyways.

I recieved all these results from a book called The Almanac of American Politics 1988 by Michael Barone and Grant Ujifusa.  It's a great read!  Cheesy

And now back to some more state data.

That's not the first time I've heard of those "almanacs" : they must be a true goldmine of political data... Do you know if modern and update versions exist ?

There are a bunch of used ones on Amazon and such, which is where I got mine.  You may be able to find some for 20-30 dollars.  Some are very expensive, up to 50 or 60 dollars.  


But mine were about $20.  They're pretty awesome.  Smiley

I have the 1986 one on loan.  American U's library has them all except the first one.  As an alumni, I can borrow them.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: October 26, 2010, 07:04:10 PM »

Nice.  If you want to post any maps, you're more than welcome to.  Smiley
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: October 26, 2010, 08:28:51 PM »

Wisconsin



Mondale carried the 5th district (most of Milwaukee and suburbs)  with 60% of the vote, the 4th district (South Milwaukee and suburbs) by a 4% margin and the 2nd district (Greater Madison) with 51% of the vote.

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: October 26, 2010, 08:40:31 PM »

That's interesting; Gore didn't carry the old South Milwaukee district in 2000.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: October 26, 2010, 08:47:25 PM »
« Edited: October 26, 2010, 09:00:07 PM by Pacific Justice Mr. Fuzzleton »

That's interesting; Gore didn't carry the old South Milwaukee district in 2000.

Maybe Reagan's attitude toward Poland and other Soviet controlled nations hurt him in the district (a lot of the district's population was of Polish ancestry).

But I agree, the swing to Bush is fascinating.
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,144


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: October 27, 2010, 03:28:21 PM »

That's interesting; Gore didn't carry the old South Milwaukee district in 2000.

Maybe Reagan's attitude toward Poland and other Soviet controlled nations hurt him in the district (a lot of the district's population was of Polish ancestry).

But I agree, the swing to Bush is fascinating.

I would have thought most Polish-Americans would have been in favour of Reagan's foreign policy, even if they were Democratic on economic issues. But who knows.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 11 queries.