CA: LA Times: Sen. Boxer leads by 8 now
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:20:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  CA: LA Times: Sen. Boxer leads by 8 now
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA: LA Times: Sen. Boxer leads by 8 now  (Read 1851 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 24, 2010, 07:10:43 AM »

New Poll: California Senator by LA Times on 2010-10-23

Summary: D: 50%, R: 42%, I: 4%, U: 4%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2010, 08:03:54 AM »

Is it me or do the Democrats poll better at the weekends?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2010, 08:05:51 AM »

It's you. You poll better on weekends.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2010, 08:10:04 AM »


Touche.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2010, 08:23:40 AM »

Isn't this poll notoriously bad?
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2010, 08:44:27 AM »


Yes, that's why it goes in the database.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2010, 11:20:27 AM »

La times needs to stop polling.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2010, 02:18:47 PM »


The rag doesn't seem to do anything well, anymore. It had an editorial, saying we needed to spend more stimulus money. That was it. Zero analysis, just an opinion and that was it, as if because it was their opinion, it has some inherent value or something. The paper is a shell of its former self, retaining only its reflexively left wing bias.
Logged
mypalfish
Rookie
**
Posts: 236


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2010, 06:15:35 PM »

PPP will be showing big leads for Boxer and Brown, too.  And they will also show that more Republcans are voting for Boxer/Brown than Dems for Fiorina/Whitman.

If there was a wave building, wouldn't it hit CA?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 24, 2010, 06:20:26 PM »

PPP will be showing big leads for Boxer and Brown, too.  And they will also show that more Republcans are voting for Boxer/Brown than Dems for Fiorina/Whitman.

If there was a wave building, wouldn't it hit CA?

You do realize California is a D+7 state, right?  How many D+7 Congressional districts do you expect Republicans to win this cycle?
Logged
Whacker77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 763


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 24, 2010, 06:23:38 PM »

I'm not saying Whitman and Fiorina will win, but I don't buy the idea more Republicans are crossing over to vote for Brown and Boxer than vice versa.  Sorry.  PPP has been very good with their primary polling, but I don't buy that nugget of info.
Logged
mypalfish
Rookie
**
Posts: 236


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 24, 2010, 06:29:27 PM »

PPP will be showing big leads for Boxer and Brown, too.  And they will also show that more Republcans are voting for Boxer/Brown than Dems for Fiorina/Whitman.

If there was a wave building, wouldn't it hit CA?

You do realize California is a D+7 state, right?  How many D+7 Congressional districts do you expect Republicans to win this cycle?

IMO, if this was a "wave" election, the GOP would win WA or CA, and they will lose both.  I'm still waiting for a new poll to come out favorable for the GOP Senate candidate that makes you sit up and take notice. 
Logged
Whacker77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 763


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 24, 2010, 06:36:51 PM »

I would say likely winning six Democrat seats with the possibility of seven, eight, or nine constitutes a wave.  We've seen this coming since the winter.  This been an early wave as opposed to 1980 that was a late wave.
Logged
mypalfish
Rookie
**
Posts: 236


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 24, 2010, 06:58:26 PM »

I would say likely winning six Democrat seats with the possibility of seven, eight, or nine constitutes a wave.  We've seen this coming since the winter.  This been an early wave as opposed to 1980 that was a late wave.

IMO, six seats would be a huge disappointment in this political climate.  I think the Dems gladly take that number if they could do so in advance.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,732


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 24, 2010, 07:21:09 PM »


The rag doesn't seem to do anything well, anymore. It had an editorial, saying we needed to spend more stimulus money. That was it. Zero analysis, just an opinion and that was it, as if because it was their opinion, it has some inherent value or something. The paper is a shell of its former self, retaining only its reflexively left wing bias.

If it's so left-wing, then how come it endorsed an anti-union Proposition that failed?
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2010, 09:09:03 PM »

PPP will be showing big leads for Boxer and Brown, too.  And they will also show that more Republcans are voting for Boxer/Brown than Dems for Fiorina/Whitman.

If there was a wave building, wouldn't it hit CA?

You do realize California is a D+7 state, right?  How many D+7 Congressional districts do you expect Republicans to win this cycle?

IMO, if this was a "wave" election, the GOP would win WA or CA, and they will lose both.  I'm still waiting for a new poll to come out favorable for the GOP Senate candidate that makes you sit up and take notice. 

will you please stop crying
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2010, 01:44:14 AM »

Fiorina still has a good shot at winning. The LA Times poll I think overestimates Democrat turnout this year. Brown doesn't have a double digit lead, and if he does, all reasonable Californians should be very afraid.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2010, 02:17:06 AM »

Fiorina still has a good shot at winning. The LA Times poll I think overestimates Democrat turnout this year. Brown doesn't have a double digit lead, and if he does, all reasonable Californians should be very afraid.

Why? It's not as if Whitman is any more serious about pension reform than Brown is. And I don't really buy all that crap about Brown being bought by the unions. If anything, it looks like the police unions bought Whitman (or was it the other way round?).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 13 queries.