Home 2012 Election Results Election Info Weblog Wiki Search Email Site Info Store

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2013, 04:28:28 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2010 Elections
| | |-+  2010 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | | |-+  SC: Rasmussen: DeMint (R) leading by 3:1		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: SC: Rasmussen: DeMint (R) leading by 3:1  (Read 1151 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27987
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39

P P P

View Profile
« on: October 25, 2010, 12:34:32 pm »
Ignore
New Poll: South Carolina Senator by Rasmussen on 2010-10-25

Summary: D: 21%, R: 58%, I: 15%, U: 6%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27987
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2010, 12:35:57 pm »
Ignore
Weird that they donīt poll the Green candidate by name ...
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13397
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2010, 01:45:51 pm »
Ignore
It would be neat if Clements actually got >10%.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68121
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2010, 01:47:59 pm »
Ignore
It's a real shame the man who started the recession will win over a true American hero. Joke epic fail state.
Logged
Smash255
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13917


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2010, 04:38:58 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: bgwah on October 25, 2010, 01:45:51 pm
It would be neat if Clements actually got >10%.

I actually spoke to my dad last night about this race.  He will be voting for Clements.
Logged
Prez Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16129


Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2010, 04:44:45 pm »
Ignore
I voted for Greene the other day. I hear he's tearing it up with early voters!
Logged
I call that getting swindled and pimped
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6862


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2010, 05:41:04 pm »
Ignore
I'd be interested to see what the racial breakdown is.
Logged
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36299
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2010, 05:59:21 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Senator Duke on October 25, 2010, 04:44:45 pm
I voted for Greene the other day. I hear he's tearing it up with early voters!

Did you really? If so, congrats!
Logged
Prez Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16129


Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2010, 06:17:06 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Eraserhead on October 25, 2010, 05:59:21 pm
Quote from: Senator Duke on October 25, 2010, 04:44:45 pm
I voted for Greene the other day. I hear he's tearing it up with early voters!

Did you really? If so, congrats!

I actually did. Tongue

Why not? It's not like DeMint will actually lose, which is a shame, and if Greene actually wins, it will provide 6 years of hilarity.
Logged
I call that getting swindled and pimped
sg0508
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 875
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 1.91

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2010, 08:42:26 pm »
Ignore
Again, everything wrong with American politics and maybe this country in general....Jim DeMint.
Logged
-Scott G
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68121
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 26, 2010, 12:31:35 am »
Ignore
Quote from: sg0508 on October 25, 2010, 08:42:26 pm
Again, everything wrong with American politics and maybe this country in general....Jim DeMint.

Yes. He started the recession after all.
Logged
albaleman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2214
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2010, 03:59:02 pm »
Ignore
WOW, if DeMint doesn't break 60% that would be embarrassing. Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.
Logged
-
KS21
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1884
Political Matrix
E: -5.50, S: -3.39

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2010, 04:05:42 pm »
Ignore
I believe that if this was a neutral/Dem year, Rawl could win.

It would be difficult, but he could.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49381


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2010, 04:12:31 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: albaleman on October 29, 2010, 03:59:02 pm
Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.

Stop it.
Logged


Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Hashemite
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30171
Paraguay


Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -7.30


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2010, 04:37:56 pm »
Ignore
58% is quite low considering the nature of his opponent(s).
Logged


Quote
20:12   oakvale   Taylor Swift's 22 was originally titled 75 in reference to her ex Flanby's proposed tax rate

Quote
20:49   Snowstalker   yes, but i'm the kind of fascist who would have backed the allies
20:57   Snowstalker   sadly, it's a legitimate ideology tarnished by the incompetent mussolini and the vile hitler
Whacker77
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 747


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2010, 05:08:36 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Lieutenant Governor KS21 on October 29, 2010, 04:05:42 pm
I believe that if this was a neutral/Dem year, Rawl could win.

It would be difficult, but he could.

Come on, man.  I admire your never give up attitude, but this is South Carolina.
Logged
-
KS21
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1884
Political Matrix
E: -5.50, S: -3.39

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2010, 06:10:40 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Whacker77 on October 29, 2010, 05:08:36 pm
Quote from: Lieutenant Governor KS21 on October 29, 2010, 04:05:42 pm
I believe that if this was a neutral/Dem year, Rawl could win.

It would be difficult, but he could.

Come on, man.  I admire your never give up attitude, but this is South Carolina.

McCain only won the state by 9. He could, but even in a Dem year, the cards would be stacked against him. Because, yes, this is South Carolina, lol.

Rawl seemed like the perfect candidate for South Carolina. And, if Rawl played his cards right and painted DeMint as a far right-winger (this would work only in a Dem/neutral year in South Carolina) that is more concerned with being kingmaker in other states and not focusing on his job, he could eke out a win.

But he would need to have an african-american running for statewide office (for turnout), at the same time as he is appealing to moderates. Not likely, but possible.
Logged
albaleman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2214
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2010, 09:22:28 am »
Ignore
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 29, 2010, 04:12:31 pm
Quote from: albaleman on October 29, 2010, 03:59:02 pm
Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.

Stop it.

If DeMint ends up with under 60% (in SC) against a pair of joke opponents it shows just how weak he really is. Not only that, he's gotten weaker. Not long ago many of us thought he'd hit 70.

Also, there was a poll that showed Rawl within 10 points of DeMint. So yes, Vic could have made this competitive. I'm not saying he would've won though.

Quote from: Lieutenant Governor KS21 on October 29, 2010, 06:10:40 pm
McCain only won the state by 9.

And the main reason he won it at all was racism.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2010, 09:33:30 am by albaleman »Logged
cinyc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7088


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2010, 09:48:56 am »
Ignore
Quote from: albaleman on October 30, 2010, 09:22:28 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 29, 2010, 04:12:31 pm
Quote from: albaleman on October 29, 2010, 03:59:02 pm
Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.

Stop it.

If DeMint ends up with under 60% (in SC) against a pair of joke opponents it shows just how weak he really is. Not only that, he's gotten weaker. Not long ago many of us thought he'd hit 70.

Also, there was a poll that showed Rawl within 10 points of DeMint. So yes, Vic could have made this competitive. I'm not saying he would've won though.

Quote from: Lieutenant Governor KS21 on October 29, 2010, 06:10:40 pm
McCain only won the state by 9.

And the main reason he won it at all was racism.

Please.  Obama wouldn't have been within 9 if it weren't for racism of a different sort.

South Carolina is a Republican state.
Logged
albaleman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2214
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 31, 2010, 11:20:26 am »
Ignore
Quote from: cinyc on October 30, 2010, 09:48:56 am
Quote from: albaleman on October 30, 2010, 09:22:28 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on October 29, 2010, 04:12:31 pm
Quote from: albaleman on October 29, 2010, 03:59:02 pm
Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.

Stop it.

If DeMint ends up with under 60% (in SC) against a pair of joke opponents it shows just how weak he really is. Not only that, he's gotten weaker. Not long ago many of us thought he'd hit 70.

Also, there was a poll that showed Rawl within 10 points of DeMint. So yes, Vic could have made this competitive. I'm not saying he would've won though.

Quote from: Lieutenant Governor KS21 on October 29, 2010, 06:10:40 pm
McCain only won the state by 9.

And the main reason he won it at all was racism.

Please.  Obama wouldn't have been within 9 if it weren't for racism of a different sort.

South Carolina is a Republican state.

No, look at the swing map in the presidential results. Notice that the only 5 states to have become more Republican from 2004-2008 (West Virginia, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Louisiana) were all southern? Though South Carolina was not in that category it was very much affected by the same factor that caused those states to swing more Republican - racism.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31527
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: October 31, 2010, 03:26:17 pm »
Ignore
Sounds like extreme hyperbole there. Zomg SC is all racist.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory