Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 04:38:13 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2010 Elections
| | |-+  2010 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | | |-+  SC: Rasmussen: DeMint (R) leading by 3:1
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: SC: Rasmussen: DeMint (R) leading by 3:1  (Read 1248 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33372
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« on: October 25, 2010, 12:34:32 pm »
Ignore

New Poll: South Carolina Senator by Rasmussen on 2010-10-25

Summary: D: 21%, R: 58%, I: 15%, U: 6%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33372
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2010, 12:35:57 pm »
Ignore

Weird that they donīt poll the Green candidate by name ...
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2010, 01:45:51 pm »
Ignore

It would be neat if Clements actually got >10%.
Logged

Passing Through a Screen Door
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 71907
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2010, 01:47:59 pm »
Ignore

It's a real shame the man who started the recession will win over a true American hero. Joke epic fail state.
Logged

Victory over Inks dedicated in memory.


01/05/2004-01/10/2014
Smash255
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14277


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2010, 04:38:58 pm »
Ignore

It would be neat if Clements actually got >10%.

I actually spoke to my dad last night about this race.  He will be voting for Clements.
Logged

Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19589


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2010, 04:44:45 pm »
Ignore

I voted for Greene the other day. I hear he's tearing it up with early voters!
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6844


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2010, 05:41:04 pm »
Ignore

I'd be interested to see what the racial breakdown is.
Logged
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38346
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2010, 05:59:21 pm »
Ignore

I voted for Greene the other day. I hear he's tearing it up with early voters!

Did you really? If so, congrats!
Logged

Aaron is pissed:

She was like "How did you get my number?  I don't handle this issue.  You have to call the South Bryant Campus for that.  I'll transfer you, but I don't handle it."  She said it in a slightly condescending tone.  I didn't tell her that Grumps gave me the number.  I just told her I looked it up.
Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19589


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2010, 06:17:06 pm »
Ignore

I voted for Greene the other day. I hear he's tearing it up with early voters!

Did you really? If so, congrats!

I actually did. Tongue

Why not? It's not like DeMint will actually lose, which is a shame, and if Greene actually wins, it will provide 6 years of hilarity.
Logged
sg0508
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1174
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 1.91

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2010, 08:42:26 pm »
Ignore

Again, everything wrong with American politics and maybe this country in general....Jim DeMint.
Logged
Passing Through a Screen Door
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 71907
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 26, 2010, 12:31:35 am »
Ignore

Again, everything wrong with American politics and maybe this country in general....Jim DeMint.

Yes. He started the recession after all.
Logged

Victory over Inks dedicated in memory.


01/05/2004-01/10/2014
albaleman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2214
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2010, 03:59:02 pm »
Ignore

WOW, if DeMint doesn't break 60% that would be embarrassing. Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.
Logged
-
KS21
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1888
Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.39

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2010, 04:05:42 pm »
Ignore

I believe that if this was a neutral/Dem year, Rawl could win.

It would be difficult, but he could.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 51577


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2010, 04:12:31 pm »
Ignore

Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.

Stop it.
Logged

PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31339
South Africa



View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2010, 04:37:56 pm »
Ignore

58% is quite low considering the nature of his opponent(s).
Logged

Whacker77
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 757


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2010, 05:08:36 pm »
Ignore

I believe that if this was a neutral/Dem year, Rawl could win.

It would be difficult, but he could.

Come on, man.  I admire your never give up attitude, but this is South Carolina.
Logged
-
KS21
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1888
Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.39

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2010, 06:10:40 pm »
Ignore

I believe that if this was a neutral/Dem year, Rawl could win.

It would be difficult, but he could.

Come on, man.  I admire your never give up attitude, but this is South Carolina.

McCain only won the state by 9. He could, but even in a Dem year, the cards would be stacked against him. Because, yes, this is South Carolina, lol.

Rawl seemed like the perfect candidate for South Carolina. And, if Rawl played his cards right and painted DeMint as a far right-winger (this would work only in a Dem/neutral year in South Carolina) that is more concerned with being kingmaker in other states and not focusing on his job, he could eke out a win.

But he would need to have an african-american running for statewide office (for turnout), at the same time as he is appealing to moderates. Not likely, but possible.
Logged
albaleman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2214
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2010, 09:22:28 am »
Ignore

Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.

Stop it.

If DeMint ends up with under 60% (in SC) against a pair of joke opponents it shows just how weak he really is. Not only that, he's gotten weaker. Not long ago many of us thought he'd hit 70.

Also, there was a poll that showed Rawl within 10 points of DeMint. So yes, Vic could have made this competitive. I'm not saying he would've won though.

McCain only won the state by 9.

And the main reason he won it at all was racism.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2010, 09:33:30 am by albaleman »Logged
cinyc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7798


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2010, 09:48:56 am »
Ignore

Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.

Stop it.

If DeMint ends up with under 60% (in SC) against a pair of joke opponents it shows just how weak he really is. Not only that, he's gotten weaker. Not long ago many of us thought he'd hit 70.

Also, there was a poll that showed Rawl within 10 points of DeMint. So yes, Vic could have made this competitive. I'm not saying he would've won though.

McCain only won the state by 9.

And the main reason he won it at all was racism.

Please.  Obama wouldn't have been within 9 if it weren't for racism of a different sort.

South Carolina is a Republican state.
Logged
albaleman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2214
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 31, 2010, 11:20:26 am »
Ignore

Think if Vic Rawl had won the Democratic nomination, this might actually be a competitive race.

Stop it.

If DeMint ends up with under 60% (in SC) against a pair of joke opponents it shows just how weak he really is. Not only that, he's gotten weaker. Not long ago many of us thought he'd hit 70.

Also, there was a poll that showed Rawl within 10 points of DeMint. So yes, Vic could have made this competitive. I'm not saying he would've won though.

McCain only won the state by 9.

And the main reason he won it at all was racism.

Please.  Obama wouldn't have been within 9 if it weren't for racism of a different sort.

South Carolina is a Republican state.

No, look at the swing map in the presidential results. Notice that the only 5 states to have become more Republican from 2004-2008 (West Virginia, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Louisiana) were all southern? Though South Carolina was not in that category it was very much affected by the same factor that caused those states to swing more Republican - racism.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31304
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: October 31, 2010, 03:26:17 pm »
Ignore

Sounds like extreme hyperbole there. Zomg SC is all racist.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines