Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 19, 2013, 11:13:15 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2010 Elections
2010 House Election Polls
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA) (Read 3279 times)
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
Posts: 6854
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #25 on:
October 28, 2010, 06:24:21 pm »
Quote from: TheDeadFlagBlues on October 28, 2010, 06:20:25 pm
Quote from: Torie on October 28, 2010, 06:08:01 pm
Quote from: TheDeadFlagBlues on October 28, 2010, 05:39:11 pm
Renee Ellmers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOiPylM_KDA
If she wins, it would be the upset of the cycle...
Ellmers did just fine fencing with Anderson Cooper. In fact, I would give her the match on points. She is no pushover. She is entitled to her opinion that the Mosque should not be built, and entitled to point out that Etheridge did not take a stand on it, until she ran her commercial. And yes, I think the Mosque should be built, but that is just my opinion. There are arguments to be made on both sides.
It's not an argument for a Congressman to be having. It's a non-issue and when someone express their outrage about it, it reveals their racist/xenophobic tendencies. Really Torie? I thought she got destroyed by Cooper. Maybe if I wiped my memory and had no knowledge of any sort of history, I would say she won.
There are no arguments to be made on both sides. This is an issue about religious freedom and when some national group wants to go against local governmental procedure to try and stop its construction, it's wrong. It's not an issue for Congress to have any say in. Personal opinion does not matter, this is a private establishment that wants to build the cultural center.
You must really hate Etheridge to be playing devil's advocate on this one.
Did he follow through and send Joe "arrest the reporter!" Miller money is what I want to know. Or is it okay if the candidate has his thugs rough up the undesirables?
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
Posts: 6701
Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #26 on:
October 28, 2010, 06:27:21 pm »
ECR, please stop posting. Permanently.
Logged
East Coast Republican
YaBB God
Posts: 772
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #27 on:
October 28, 2010, 06:49:29 pm »
Dude, please stop addressing me. Permanently.
Logged
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
Posts: 7757
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #28 on:
October 28, 2010, 06:53:38 pm »
Quote from: East Coast Republican on October 28, 2010, 06:49:29 pm
Dude, please stop addressing me. Permanently.
You're not as clever as you think you are, little boy.
Logged
East Coast Republican
YaBB God
Posts: 772
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #29 on:
October 28, 2010, 06:58:48 pm »
Quote from: Andrew Cuomo on October 28, 2010, 06:53:38 pm
Quote from: East Coast Republican on October 28, 2010, 06:49:29 pm
Dude, please stop addressing me. Permanently.
You're not as clever as you think you are, little boy.
Post amended. You're most likely younger than I am.
How do you know what cleverness is? You consider cleverness calling someone racist for no reason.
«
Last Edit: October 28, 2010, 07:04:25 pm by East Coast Republican
»
Logged
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
Posts: 7757
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #30 on:
October 28, 2010, 06:59:37 pm »
Quote from: East Coast Republican on October 28, 2010, 06:58:48 pm
Quote from: Andrew Cuomo on October 28, 2010, 06:53:38 pm
Quote from: East Coast Republican on October 28, 2010, 06:49:29 pm
Dude, please stop addressing me. Permanently.
You're not as clever as you think you are, little boy.
This is coming from a 15 year old I presume?
16, actually.
Logged
East Coast Republican
YaBB God
Posts: 772
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #31 on:
October 28, 2010, 07:05:02 pm »
lol
Well, at least it's great you're taking a high level of interest in world affairs.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24644
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #32 on:
October 28, 2010, 07:05:16 pm »
Replying to the post above directed to me from TDFB, there is no question that the promoters have the
right
to build the mosque. The issue is whether the promoters can be subject to criticism for
exercising
that right. The Iman who is the front man is kind of a shadowy figure (at least weird and camelion like), and the source of his money (if the money is really there), is even more murky, and the motives for pushing all of this arguably less than praiseworthy.
Personally I don't mind the mosque going up, even if the sponsors are closets Jihadists and militants, because that indeed would be a testimony of the confidence of Americans that toxic ideas are just not going to get traction in this country, and as a reflection of our self confidence, our tolerance for stuff we consider execrable, because in our diverse country, we have all sorts of folks some of us consider execrable, and life goes on. That is who we are, and we take pride in that - or should.
Does that make sense?
Oh yes, I think there is a real possibility that the whole Mosque thing is a set up, and there was
never
any intention to build it, or at least a realistic belief that the money would be raised, and the whole point of the exercise was in fact to "expose" Americans as a bunch of paranoid, hypocritical bigots to the Arab street, and the Islamic world at large. As I say, I just don't trust the motives of these particular promoters. So, calling their bluff would just be a delightful bonus to it all.
Logged
Torie's secret highway
Wrecking Ball and Chain
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68313
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #33 on:
October 28, 2010, 10:08:49 pm »
Quote from: Dgov on October 28, 2010, 06:13:40 pm
Quote from: Estes Kefauver on October 28, 2010, 04:33:16 pm
This is a conservative outfit that ordered the poll, so we'll see what happens. It flipped in 1994 and then flipped back in 1996, so this wouldn't be a long term GOP hold.
I think you mean the neighboring NC-4 (which is still represented by the same guy actually)
Actually, strike that, this district flipped too. Though the previous one was more competitive (Obama won the current iteration by a few points). If the republicans can block a Democratic gerrymander, then they should be able to hold this seat pretty easily.
It's not that easy. It already includes the entirety of Johnston County, the only real Republican bastion in that area. You can't really mess with eastern NC because of the VRA, can't move into NC-13 or 4 without making it more Democratic obviously, and the bordering areas in NC-07 are either Democratic or swing. The only real option is to give it Moore county from NC-06 in exchange for some of the rural areas north of there. Total makes it about 52% McCain. Not safe for someone as bad as Ellmer.
Logged
SamInTheSouth
Sr. Member
Posts: 287
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #34 on:
October 29, 2010, 06:02:26 pm »
Quote from: Estes Kefauver on October 28, 2010, 04:33:16 pm
This is a conservative outfit that ordered the poll, so we'll see what happens. It flipped in 1994 and then flipped back in 1996, so this wouldn't be a long term GOP hold.
The problem with your logic is that the Republicans have a good shot to win control of the North Carolina legislature in this election so they will control redistricting and likely redraw NC-02 to make it more Republican friendly should Ellmers win.
Logged
SamInTheSouth
Sr. Member
Posts: 287
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #35 on:
October 29, 2010, 06:03:23 pm »
Quote from: TheDeadFlagBlues on October 28, 2010, 05:05:14 pm
Do you guys even know who Renee Ellmers is? She's one of the worst candidates fielded by the GOP, up there with Maes, Miller, and O'Donnell.
I agree with you and that what makes this poll all the more shocking, assuming it's accurate. This isn't the first time she's lead him, though in polling.
Logged
Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
Posts: 2713
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #36 on:
October 29, 2010, 07:26:46 pm »
Quote from: SamInTheSouth on October 29, 2010, 06:02:26 pm
The problem with your logic is that the Republicans have a good shot to win control of the North Carolina legislature in this election so they will control redistricting and likely redraw NC-02 to make it more Republican friendly should Ellmers win.
As another poster mentioned, it's not possible that they can actually turn this into a safe really Republican district. And, with North Carolina having Democratic Governor in Beverly Perdue, I doubt she would approve any huge Republican gerrymandering.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
Posts: 6854
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #37 on:
October 29, 2010, 07:52:48 pm »
There's no veto power over redistricting in North Carolina.
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #38 on:
October 30, 2010, 03:49:14 pm »
Quote from: Estes Kefauver on October 29, 2010, 07:26:46 pm
Quote from: SamInTheSouth on October 29, 2010, 06:02:26 pm
The problem with your logic is that the Republicans have a good shot to win control of the North Carolina legislature in this election so they will control redistricting and likely redraw NC-02 to make it more Republican friendly should Ellmers win.
As another poster mentioned, it's not possible that they can actually turn this into a safe really Republican district. And, with North Carolina having Democratic Governor in Beverly Perdue, I doubt she would approve any huge Republican gerrymandering.
Well, it would presumably be an incumbent-protection map, and given how many Democratic incumbents you would have to protect (especially in the Raleigh area), this district will more or less have to be strongly Republican. The only reason the current one is even competitive is that it includes some heavily Democratic parts of Fayette and Raleigh, which would presumably be removed.
I'll predict that if the Republicans take one of the state houses, the new NC-2 will have voted about 55% McCain.
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Wrecking Ball and Chain
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68313
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #39 on:
October 30, 2010, 09:27:55 pm »
Neither Price or Miller need to be shored up. Price already represents the most Democratic majority white district in the South. Miller drew his own seat and can't really be made more Dem, add more of Raleigh you just have to shed parts of Raleigh or Greensboro. You can't shed the rural counties because they connect it. I don't see how to even draw a 55% McCain district with this one.
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
Posts: 1578
Re: NC-2: Etheridge down 46/41 (SUSA)
«
Reply #40 on:
October 30, 2010, 09:58:31 pm »
Quote from: He flooded the land then he set it on fire on October 30, 2010, 09:27:55 pm
Neither Price or Miller need to be shored up. Price already represents the most Democratic majority white district in the South. Miller drew his own seat and can't really be made more Dem, add more of Raleigh you just have to shed parts of Raleigh or Greensboro. You can't shed the rural counties because they connect it. I don't see how to even draw a 55% McCain district with this one.
you take the Outer Raliegh areas, like th 4th district's part of Wake County, Johnson county, and move it back towards the 3rd district areas. The 13th and 4th basically just take all of Durnham, Orange counties, most of Wake county, and the North-central counties.
Remember, this would be an incumbent-protectino plan, so there's no reason to leave the swing/republican areas in the 4th or 13th district while leaving some Democrat-leaning ones in the 2nd.
Logged
Political Matrix: +7.1, -3.83
A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...