Official Re-Districting Thread for Governors only
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:44:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Official Re-Districting Thread for Governors only
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Official Re-Districting Thread for Governors only  (Read 3595 times)
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: November 18, 2004, 05:59:20 PM »
« edited: November 18, 2004, 06:05:44 PM by Peter Bell »

Since K1 only got the approval of 3 of the governors, then it comes down to a two way contest between J and K and J was preferred over K by 3  with K preferred over J by only 2, so I'm assuming that J is the plan we've adopted.

...

And if that's not good enough for the Attorney General, I'll switch my preference to J, just so we get this over and done with.

I think you've miscounted:
K was preferred over J by Ernest, MAS and NickG.
J was preferred over K by Wildcard and ILV

Thats only a 3-2 margin, and would require one of the J governors to change, or two of the K governors to change.

It sounds like Nick and Ernest are willing to change, so it would be 4-1 for J which is a constitutional margin.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: November 18, 2004, 06:02:44 PM »

Yup, I miscounted.  My mistake.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: November 18, 2004, 06:13:42 PM »

What is the primary objection to K1?  I drew it up as a compromise between J and K, and it moves very few states.

I know the reason why Wildcard doesn't like K1, but I don't know why he has that reason.
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: November 18, 2004, 06:26:53 PM »

So are we  just voting on either Plan K or Plan J?
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: November 18, 2004, 06:29:23 PM »

All the way with "J"!!!
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: November 18, 2004, 06:38:15 PM »

I've spoken to both ILV and MAS via AIM; Neither are willing to budge.

Could either both Ernest and NickG change their vote OR could Wildcard change his vote so that this can come to a resolution please.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,203


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: November 18, 2004, 07:14:10 PM »

I'm think I am leaning more toward J now than K, but I haven't really heard any arguments for why one is better than the other or either is better than K1.

My objections to K are that is creates a very strange looking D3 and D5, and generally changes more than necessary from the status quo.  My objection to J is that it creates a strange, sprawling D2, that includes Virginia with New England, but not Vermont.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: November 18, 2004, 07:37:41 PM »

K balances the population between the districts fairly well.  Trying to achieve a better balance betwen the districts would require even more convolutions.  If J moved VT to D2, it wouldn't be constitutional as D2 would then have 30 voters while D3, D4, and D5 all have 25 voters and gven the current distribution, 4 is the maximum difference we can have.  (In practice, the current constitutional limits boil down to a 3 voter difference if the number of voters is a multiple of 5 and a 4 voter difference if the number ain't a multiple of 5.)
Logged
TheWildCard
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,529
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: November 18, 2004, 07:42:54 PM »

I am willing to switch my vote to K if that means we can finally end the redistricting process.
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: November 18, 2004, 07:58:10 PM »

I am willing to switch my vote to K if that means we can finally end the redistricting process.

Ok then good.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 11 queries.