NATIONAL SENATE/HOUSE RESULTS THREAD (LATE RESULTS/POSTMORTEM)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:48:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NATIONAL SENATE/HOUSE RESULTS THREAD (LATE RESULTS/POSTMORTEM)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 ... 62
Poll
Question: Who won the 2010 election?
#1
Republicans
 
#2
Democrats
 
#3
Neither Party
 
#4
Both Parties
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 78

Author Topic: NATIONAL SENATE/HOUSE RESULTS THREAD (LATE RESULTS/POSTMORTEM)  (Read 157866 times)
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,948
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #850 on: November 03, 2010, 01:40:35 AM »

Well that's three Senate seats the teabaggers cost the GOP it appears (CO, NV and DE)

Got to hand it to Bennet though, his pulling through was also largely thanks to him. Good job Bennet.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,450


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #851 on: November 03, 2010, 01:41:31 AM »

All of Douglas is now in.  Buck up 6,865,  I don't see anyway how Buck wins this outside of some other error out there which went the other way.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #852 on: November 03, 2010, 01:47:51 AM »

I watched CNN for 15 minutes and almost barfed. Now I remember why I told myself I was going to avoid any election coverage on TV. I wasn't really disappointed with these results until I saw Erik Erikson and other such goons having near on screen orgasms. All they did when someone brought up the point "governing is going to be difficult" is say "DON'T DIMINISH OUR VICTORY".

I would not say that things look peachy for the GOP in 2012, or for the Democrats really. It's the perfect time for a third party to come into play or for a movement to completely take over one of the parties.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #853 on: November 03, 2010, 01:48:47 AM »

MSNBC rolled out the B team. It's like amateur hour over there now.

Fox News did too - but Michael Barone is now on the B team for some bizarre reason.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #854 on: November 03, 2010, 01:50:44 AM »

I would not say that things look peachy for the GOP in 2012, or for the Democrats really. It's the perfect time for a third party to come into play or for a movement to completely take over one of the parties.

How we need a viable third party...
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #855 on: November 03, 2010, 01:51:26 AM »

Great work Lief. Thanks for setting me straight. Not that I consider all on your list remotely blue dogs, but they are not in the forefront of the "yes we can" agenda either.

Plus 65 seats eh, Cinyc? What was my predicted number again?  Smiley  By the way, it is 64, with probably 3 or 4 on either side of that. The Pubbie is not going to win CT-4. Look at what's out.

Sure, I got about 15 seats wrong, but they went both ways. Sometimes statistics works in your favor. Tongue And I suspect the generic number I used to generate the number was pretty close too.



Yes, Torie - it looks like you'll be right on the money.  The Republican isn't going to win CT-04 - the New York Times called it for Himes.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,721


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #856 on: November 03, 2010, 01:55:48 AM »
« Edited: November 03, 2010, 01:58:08 AM by cinyc »

Thanks cinyc.  For the House, everything turned out quite well with the rankings.  Like the dashboard too.

The only thing that sticks out as out of place is OR-05 - but that's largely SUSA's fault.

And on the other side, NY-13 and maybe IL-08, depending on the final result there.  But otherwise, an excellent job ranking the races.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #857 on: November 03, 2010, 02:01:58 AM »
« Edited: November 03, 2010, 02:03:40 AM by Torie »

The GOP shot its was in Yuma County, and came up a bit short. AZ-7 stays Dem. AZ-08 is about certain to remain Dem, in fact I really should call that one too. And Labrador has won ID-01, over the Dem Minnick. If it has not been called, it should.

It is possible that the GOP will gain no seats in CA. Stay tuned. The GOP margins with mostly just absentee ballots are very thin in CA-11 and CA-20, and Tran is behind by 5 points in CA-47, although with the Vietnamese thing, maybe absentees there will have less of a lean.

Oh, and Djou is behind a tad in the absentees. He is in trouble. Sad
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,169
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #858 on: November 03, 2010, 02:02:13 AM »

     Seems Labrador is leading Minnick by 8%.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #859 on: November 03, 2010, 02:06:17 AM »

    Seems Labrador is leading Minnick by 8%.

And the bulk of what is left is in Labrador country in Ada County. This one is over.
Logged
ucscgaldamez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 373


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #860 on: November 03, 2010, 02:07:06 AM »

will they continue updating through the night?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #861 on: November 03, 2010, 02:07:25 AM »

Now if I could only figure out exactly what was left in St. Louis County.  Do they even know?
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #862 on: November 03, 2010, 02:10:40 AM »

Now if I could only figure out exactly what was left in St. Louis County.  Do they even know?

How many precincts in St. Louis County are GOP?  Oberstar has won unless I missed something.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #863 on: November 03, 2010, 02:12:16 AM »
« Edited: November 03, 2010, 02:15:08 AM by Sam Spade »

Now if I could only figure out exactly what was left in St. Louis County.  Do they even know?

How many precincts in St. Louis County are GOP?  Oberstar has won unless I missed something.

CNN says he's down 2500, with 92% of precincts and 97% from St. Louis (rest of stuff "out" should be good for Cravaack).  But I don't necessarily believe this.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #864 on: November 03, 2010, 02:13:15 AM »

Labrador's 50% win is still laughably weak. I demand a 2012 rematch!

Yeah though it looks like I did all of that volunteering for nothing.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #865 on: November 03, 2010, 02:14:22 AM »
« Edited: November 03, 2010, 02:25:28 AM by Torie »

When I looked 45 minutes ago, it was listed as 22% in from St. Louis County, and in fact it was much higher, and now 97%

St. Louis
Updated 11 minutes ago
Oberstar
(Incumbent)
   
47,468
   57%
Cravaack
   
32,968
   40%
97% of precincts reporting

Addendum: And for the rest of the story we have this:

Isanti
Updated 1 minute ago
Cravaack
   
4,970
   55%
Oberstar
(Incumbent)
   
3,512
   39%
67% of precincts reporting

And what little is out in other counties, is slightly pro the Pubbie.

Oberstar has lost!

Addendum 2: BRTD, the reason St. Louis County was anemic for Oberstar was the abortion issue. Deal with it. Dayton is carrying it by a much bigger margin. Sure send Obama a message in a way a governor's race just doesn't have quite as much traction (particularly in a state not as economically prostrate as most), was part of it too.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,169
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #866 on: November 03, 2010, 02:15:05 AM »

    Seems Labrador is leading Minnick by 8%.

And the bulk of what is left is in Labrador country in Ada County. This one is over.

     ID-01 was a seat that only fell to begin with by a combination of a weak incumbent, a strong challenger, & a strong tide against the incumbent's party. The Democrats probably won't see it again for decades.
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #867 on: November 03, 2010, 02:15:28 AM »

god damn it angle shut up
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #868 on: November 03, 2010, 02:16:18 AM »

So, what the greatest R+x seat held by a Dem for the next Congress?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #869 on: November 03, 2010, 02:16:38 AM »

When I looked 45 minutes ago, it was listed as 22% in from St. Louis County, and in fact it was much higher, and now 97%

St. Louis
Updated 11 minutes ago
Oberstar
(Incumbent)
   
47,468
   57%
Cravaack
   
32,968
   40%
97% of precincts reporting



So, after being king of Kentucky for today by nailing Rand Paul's numbers (56-44) and the Dem holds there, if I call Dayton by 1, Walz wins and Oberstar loses, do I get to be king of Minnesota for a day?
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #870 on: November 03, 2010, 02:17:34 AM »

Well at least I called Labrador winning correctly...
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #871 on: November 03, 2010, 02:18:58 AM »

All right, what's going on with MN-08?  Who is likely to win at this point?
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #872 on: November 03, 2010, 02:19:57 AM »

When I looked 45 minutes ago, it was listed as 22% in from St. Louis County, and in fact it was much higher, and now 97%

St. Louis
Updated 11 minutes ago
Oberstar
(Incumbent)
   
47,468
   57%
Cravaack
   
32,968
   40%
97% of precincts reporting



So, after being king of Kentucky for today by nailing Rand Paul's numbers (56-44) and the Dem holds there, if I call Dayton by 1, Walz wins and Oberstar loses, do I get to be king of Minnesota for a day?

Minnesota is definitely a step up from KY.  Tongue
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #873 on: November 03, 2010, 02:20:43 AM »

So, what the greatest R+x seat held by a Dem for the next Congress?

And to answer my own question, OK-2 is R+14. Impressive, Mr. Boren.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #874 on: November 03, 2010, 02:21:44 AM »

So, what the greatest R+x seat held by a Dem for the next Congress?

UT-02 (R+15)
OK-02 (R+14)
KY-06 (R+9)
WV-3 (R+6)
NC-11 (R+6)
PA-4 (R+6)
PA-17 (R+6)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 ... 62  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 14 queries.