Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 03, 2015, 08:34:03 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Presidential Election Process
| | |-+  Polling (Moderator: muon2)
| | | |-+  Rasmussen Reports Polls Were Biased
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Rasmussen Reports Polls Were Biased  (Read 4425 times)
Lunar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30443
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« on: November 03, 2010, 01:47:31 pm »
Ignore

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/02/live-blogging-election-night/#rasmussen-reports-polls-were-biased

SHOCKING
Logged

this is real
Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20643


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2010, 02:29:00 pm »
Ignore

I think most polls were biased towards the Republicans in most of the Senate races this year. In particular, Nevada and California.
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32065
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2010, 04:44:47 pm »
Ignore

I don't know.  Didn't PPP have some of the same results?

Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
kevinatcausa
Full Member
***
Posts: 196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -5.04

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2010, 10:24:29 am »
Ignore

He's put out a more detailed analysis.  Note that Rasmussen's numbers would be about 0.4 better in each column if it weren't for that one Hawaii poll. 
Logged

Political Matrix:
Economic: -1.94     Social: -5.04
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9015
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2010, 08:56:45 pm »
Ignore

He's put out a more detailed analysis.  Note that Rasmussen's numbers would be about 0.4 better in each column if it weren't for that one Hawaii poll. 

Let's be fair though, how could any "professional" polling company have gotten that Hawaii poll so wrong? It'd be like releasing a poll tomorrow showing Obama losing in D.C. to Sarah Palin.
Logged

tpfkaw
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8669
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2010, 09:44:00 pm »
Ignore

If we're on that subject, we could bring up PPP's infamous NY-23 poll, or that SurveyUSA this year which showed Gillibrand and DioGuardi tied.  Every prolific pollster has one poll in a cycle that way misses the mark.
Logged
feeblepizza
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2947
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2010, 12:06:23 am »
Ignore

If we're on that subject, we could bring up PPP's infamous NY-23 poll, or that SurveyUSA this year which showed Gillibrand and DioGuardi tied.  Every prolific pollster has one poll in a cycle that way misses the mark.

Exactly. No need to get angry because Rasmussen made a simple error that all pollsters make once in a while.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2010, 12:08:09 am by feeblepizza »Logged

Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13769


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2010, 01:45:10 am »
Ignore

I think it's consistent error and bias this year which is the issue, not the Hawaii poll.
Logged
Lunar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30443
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2010, 11:31:16 pm »
Ignore

Weasel Silver is a delusional liar and a hack. He's been caught in so many lies that nothing he says is credible. He is purposefully manipulating data in order to try to discredit Rasmussen. The fact is, Rasmussen correctly picked the results in several States while others like PPP got the winner wrong.

Rasmussen also incorrectly picked the results in several states, factually.  Rasmussen also factually did not show poll results closer to the actual results than most other mainstream pollsters, on average.  

What evidence are you looking at?

Does anyone think that single-day sample robocalls with zero callbacks, inter-household randomization or cell phone numbers is going to fly as acceptable polling techniques among junkies in 10 years?
« Last Edit: November 06, 2010, 11:33:26 pm by LunarCare »Logged

this is real
Joe Republic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31859
Kiribati


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2010, 11:37:20 pm »
Ignore




Says it all, really.
Logged



Real Americans (and Big Sky Bob) demand to know.


[Y]ou are not going to change my mind or even cause me to think.
-
KS21
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1909
Political Matrix
E: -0.97, S: -3.39

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2010, 06:07:45 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen. BIASED?

Not suprised. Just confrimed what I knew all along. Cheap, low cost polls have very little accuracy.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14180


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -2.61

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2010, 07:45:44 pm »
Ignore

Washington Senate - Rossi vs. Murray   FOX News/POR-Rasmussen   Murray 49, Rossi 47   Murray +2
Washington Senate - Rossi vs. Murray   PPP (D)   Murray 48, Rossi 50   Rossi +2

Alaska Senate - Miller vs. McAdams vs. Murkowski   PPP (D)   Miller 37, Murkowski 30, McAdams 30   Miller +7

California Senate - Boxer vs. Fiorina   PPP (D)   Boxer 50, Fiorina 46   Boxer +4
California Senate - Boxer vs. Fiorina   SurveyUSA   Boxer 46, Fiorina 38   Boxer +8

Yes, some of their polls were more accurate than other pollsters. But on average, they were more inaccurate than other pollsters. Taking all polls into account - not just ones you cherry pick - reveals this. What is so difficult to understand about that?
Logged
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22410
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2010, 02:50:44 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen. BIASED?

Not suprised. Just confrimed what I knew all along. Cheap, low cost polls have very little accuracy.

lol
Logged
Senator PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23435
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 19, 2010, 03:53:35 pm »
Ignore

Rasmussen. BIASED?

Not suprised. Just confrimed what I knew all along. Cheap, low cost polls have very little accuracy.

lol

     Rasmussen messed it up pretty badly, though the general consistency in the error of their polls suggests that they would have performed very well if they had just weighted the polls differently.
Logged

minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58767
India


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2010, 08:02:07 am »
Ignore

Should point out that Rasmussen managed to be this bad on average  despite releasing the most polls of anybody. It's really a performance not explainable except by systemic bias (intended or not).
Logged

If I'm shown as having been active here recently it's either because I've been using the gallery, because I've been using the search engine looking up something from way back, or because I've been reading the most excellent UK by-elections thread again.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines