Northeast Assembly Legislation Introduction Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:14:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Northeast Assembly Legislation Introduction Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Northeast Assembly Legislation Introduction Thread  (Read 100063 times)
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« on: September 04, 2015, 04:09:14 PM »

Inspired by the recent law concerning incestuous relationships:

[quote]Definition of Marriage Act

1. Marriage shall restricted to being between: one man and one woman; two men; or two women.

2. All married couples shall receive the same government benefits and responsibilities regardless of sexual orientation.

3. Marriage shall be a civil union between two consenting individuals of legal age (defined as 16 with parental permission, 18 without).

4. Incest (as defined by the Apparently Incest is Legal Now Act), shall be prohibited.

5. Sexual or marital relationships with the following shall be prohibited: animals; and minors (under the age of 18).

6. Anyone discovered to have violated any provision of this act shall be subject too a $100 fine.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2015, 05:09:43 PM »

Also, looking through the wiki page on the Northeast, I found that our anthem is apparently Rick Astley's "Never Going to Give You Up". Are we deliberately trying to rick-roll people?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2015, 09:10:19 PM »

This..this is completely ridiculous. Why would you do this just to spite someone?
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2015, 03:09:24 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2015, 01:24:33 PM »
« Edited: November 10, 2015, 06:59:35 PM by Lt. Governor Kent »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

EDIT: On second thought, maybe we should wait until the Election Laws committee is done streamlining all the current laws.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2015, 06:50:53 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah, I know that large portions of it (particularly Section 2) are likely to already be in place, but I thought it would make sense to have it all in one location.

Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2015, 02:22:31 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2015, 10:28:44 PM »

This takes priority now. The SOAP is unclear as to who presents this to the Assembly. The default assumption would be that the Speaker presents it, but that might constitute a conflict of interest here.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2015, 07:44:47 AM »

According to the Northeast SOAP, we should elect a speaker at the start of every term:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm not 100% sure when the new term starts, however, although it should be quite soon.
Friday, IIRC. The SOAP also has a clause allowing us to vacate the Speakership early if we want.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2015, 08:37:44 AM »

This takes priority now. The SOAP is unclear as to who presents this to the Assembly. The default assumption would be that the Speaker presents it, but that might constitute a conflict of interest here.
I'd argue that it falls to the Lt. Gov.
Looks like the SOAP says otherwise, which is weird. I guess RGN has to do it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.