Red State Stereotype (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:55:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Red State Stereotype (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Red State Stereotype  (Read 13957 times)
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

« on: November 16, 2004, 07:17:06 AM »

Liberals have been using the stereotype of the "red state voter" to discredit Bush and delegitimize his victory.

It's similar in a way to when Republicans used the murder rates of counties that voted for Gore, versus counties that voted for Bush, in 2000, to discredit Gore voters.  But of course, that didn't receive the play in the media that this outburst of bigotry against "red state voters" has.

I voted for Bush, and I don't even live in a "red" state.  I am not an "evangelical Christian" (whatever that means).  However, I am a Christian and believe in traditional Judeo-Christian values.  But that's not even the main reason I voted for Bush.  I have never voted for other than the Republican candidate for president since 1980, and my reasons have always been pretty consistent.

1. National security - Since the 1960s, Democrats have seemed indifferent, even hostile, to national security concerns.  It seems they are more concerned about not offending our enemies than preserving our security.  OTOH, Republicans have been in the forefront of rebuilding and maintaining our military, and taking the action necessary to preserve our security.

2. Crime/Personal Responsibility - In general, the Democrats exude an attitude of disdain for personal responsiblity.  When somebody does something wrong, they seem to blame everybody and everything except the actual person who did it.  There has been a tendency to make perpetrators into victims, and vice versa.  Democrats seem to believe in rights with no responsibilities.  Their open-ended welfare policies, which encouraged young unmarried women to have children at the public expense, were a perfect example of this.

3. Interest Groups - I have a strong dislike for many of the interest groups that form the base of the Democratic Party.  I think that the "civil rights" groups, rather than promoting black advancement, have become a form of organized crime, and that the "women's groups" are largely a collection of man-hating feminazis who seek to impose active discrimination against men.  Trial lawyers are an abomination, and a symbol of an out-of-control legal system that has the potential to ruin our business climate and severely damage our economy.

4.  Social Issues - While I am not an "evangelical Christian," I find the active hostility toward any type of Christianity that I see emerging in the Democratic Party to be very alarming.  I think one of the most dangerous trends, heading toward a potential constitutional crisis, is the trend toward judicial activism.  The judiciary has stepped over the line of its authority in my opinion, and must be reined in, and liberal groups favor judicial activism because it allows them to use, in effect, black-robed dictators to impose unpopular change on society that they favor.  I favor traditional values in general; I don't, for example, believe that raising a child as a single parent is a "choice" that is equal to raising a child within a stable marriage.  All indicators point to inferior results from this type of child-rearing, and there's no point in pretending otherwise to advance a highly dubious political agenda.

The reality is that the "elites" who are denigrating "red state voters" as extremists are the extremists themselves.  And their hypocritical bigotry has shown through beautifully in the wake of this election.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2004, 11:00:04 AM »

an "evangelical Christian" (whatever that means)

Here are the definitions of evangelical...

adj.
Of, relating to, or in accordance with the Christian gospel, especially one of the four gospel books of the New Testament.
Evangelical Of, relating to, or being a Protestant church that founds its teaching on the gospel.
Evangelical Of, relating to, or being a Christian church believing in the sole authority and inerrancy of the Bible, in salvation only through regeneration, and in a spiritually transformed personal life.
Evangelical
Of or relating to the Lutheran churches in Germany and Switzerland.
Of or relating to all Protestant churches in Germany.
Of or relating to the group in the Church of England that stresses personal conversion and salvation by faith.
Characterized by ardent or crusading enthusiasm; zealous: an evangelical liberal.

n.
Evangelical A member of an evangelical church or party.

Thanks for the definition, though I'm not sure the political definition matches the one in the dictionary.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.