What is considered a 'Safe' popular vote win? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:02:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process
  Polling (Moderator: muon2)
  What is considered a 'Safe' popular vote win? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What is considered a 'Safe' popular vote win?  (Read 16810 times)
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« on: March 19, 2004, 11:26:47 PM »

Hughes lost the popular vote by 3.12% in 1916, but would have won the electoral vote had he had 400 more votes in Minnesota. This is more than Hayes' margin in 1876', and I think 4% is the margin in a normal two-party race, although two or three percent should win it. Anything less than two percent is subject to luck.

I suppose a situation could occur where Bush had some extreme plan to rmake NYC or LA, and had no support from those two states. I do think that polls do influence how people vote, so I major popular vote upset would be unlikely.
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2004, 02:02:24 PM »

Yes, I'd predict that in 20 years, 75% of the electoral vote, will be within 5% of the national average.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.