US House Redistricting: Michigan
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 07:07:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: Michigan
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Michigan  (Read 85016 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #375 on: June 26, 2011, 11:07:11 PM »


All of the districts are contiguous.  Obviously it's not a legal map, but I did obey contiguity and VRA laws.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,999
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #376 on: June 26, 2011, 11:17:09 PM »

How is it continuous? It's the non-coastal upper half of the lower peninsula plus a chunk of the thumb which is surrounded by District 5.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #377 on: June 26, 2011, 11:58:23 PM »

There is no question Michigan's current map is gerrymandered. Under the 1990s plan, Gore won 9 CD's to Bush's 7. Under the 2000s plan, Gore would have won 5 CD's to Bush's 10.

Anyone have the Kerry-Bush numbers for the new CD's? Obama-McCain isn't really a good measure in Michigan.

Alternately, those same facts suggest that the apportionment in the 1990's was gerrymandered to favor the Democrats, while the current map accurately reflects the fact that most of Michigan leans slightly Republican.

Yes, the Republican-controlled Senate and John Engler gerrymandered in favor of the Democrats...

And until 2010, the state didn't really lean Republican.  We elect Republicans to some offices, but as a whole, the state tends to lean Democratic.  This does change from district to district though.

Again, my claim isn't that Michigan, as a whole, leans Republican. The claim I made is that Michigan consists of the few areas with heavy concentration of Democrats, and the rest that leans Republican. That is, Democrats are "packed," while Republicans aren't.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #378 on: June 27, 2011, 12:06:22 AM »

There is no question Michigan's current map is gerrymandered. Under the 1990s plan, Gore won 9 CD's to Bush's 7. Under the 2000s plan, Gore would have won 5 CD's to Bush's 10.

Anyone have the Kerry-Bush numbers for the new CD's? Obama-McCain isn't really a good measure in Michigan.

Alternately, those same facts suggest that the apportionment in the 1990's was gerrymandered to favor the Democrats, while the current map accurately reflects the fact that most of Michigan leans slightly Republican.

Yes, the Republican-controlled Senate and John Engler gerrymandered in favor of the Democrats...

And until 2010, the state didn't really lean Republican.  We elect Republicans to some offices, but as a whole, the state tends to lean Democratic.  This does change from district to district though.

Again, my claim isn't that Michigan, as a whole, leans Republican. The claim I made is that Michigan consists of the few areas with heavy concentration of Democrats, and the rest that leans Republican. That is, Democrats are "packed," while Republicans aren't.

That's how most states are though.  Just because the Republican-leaning land mass is greater than the land mass of the Democrat-leaning areas doesn't mean you can gerrymander the crap out of the state to "reflect" this.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #379 on: June 27, 2011, 12:07:15 AM »

How is it continuous? It's the non-coastal upper half of the lower peninsula plus a chunk of the thumb which is surrounded by District 5.

Oops!  I was thinking those were 2 separate districts.  I'm surprised the softwre didn't catch that.  Fixing those now!
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #380 on: June 27, 2011, 12:24:23 AM »

All fied - although you may have to refresh to get rid of any cached images.  Now that that's fixed, District 5 doesn't look quite so bad wacky either.  Thanks for cathching that, BRTD! Smiley
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,953


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #381 on: June 27, 2011, 09:05:06 AM »

LOL at that coastal district. Very creative.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #382 on: June 27, 2011, 09:12:58 AM »

Haha, I love the grey district Grin
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #383 on: June 28, 2011, 08:04:26 PM »
« Edited: June 28, 2011, 08:18:34 PM by krazen1211 »

What do I see? The Dem map.

http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/mich_redistricting.pdf

Livingston County paired with Lansing.

Oakland County cut 5 ways.

Not even 1 district entirely within Wayne County.

Oakland to Macomb double cross.
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,144


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #384 on: June 28, 2011, 08:16:26 PM »

What do I see?

http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/mich_redistricting.pdf

Livingston County paired with Lansing.

Oakland County cut 5 ways.

Not even 1 district entirely within Wayne County.

Oakland to Macomb double cross.

What map is that?
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #385 on: June 28, 2011, 08:18:17 PM »

Ah, I missed the headline. This is the Democratic proposed map for Michigan Congressional redistricting.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #386 on: June 28, 2011, 08:55:43 PM »

What do I see? The Dem map.

http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/mich_redistricting.pdf

Livingston County paired with Lansing.

Oakland County cut 5 ways.

Not even 1 district entirely within Wayne County.

Oakland to Macomb double cross.

That's almost as bad as the Republican map. In fact, in some places, it's worse.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,074
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #387 on: June 28, 2011, 09:25:44 PM »

It is a joke map, and appears as illegal as hell. But I guess they wanted to make Levin feel good or something.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #388 on: June 28, 2011, 09:38:46 PM »

What do I see? The Dem map.

http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/mich_redistricting.pdf

Livingston County paired with Lansing.

Oakland County cut 5 ways.

Not even 1 district entirely within Wayne County.

Oakland to Macomb double cross.

That's almost as bad as the Republican map. In fact, in some places, it's worse.

Yeah, that's a fail.  They seem to have copied literally all of the outstate regions from the Republican map.  Classy.

Well, hey, underscores why MI Dems are often just as bad as MI Reps.  I'm glad I voted Green for Governor Tongue

What's going on their in their MI-12 and MI-15?  Did they just decide to use two identical colors next to each other?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #389 on: June 29, 2011, 11:42:55 PM »

What do I see? The Dem map.

http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/mich_redistricting.pdf

Livingston County paired with Lansing.

Oakland County cut 5 ways.

Not even 1 district entirely within Wayne County.

Oakland to Macomb double cross.

That's almost as bad as the Republican map. In fact, in some places, it's worse.

Yeah, that's a fail.  They seem to have copied literally all of the outstate regions from the Republican map.  Classy.

Well, hey, underscores why MI Dems are often just as bad as MI Reps.  I'm glad I voted Green for Governor Tongue

What's going on their in their MI-12 and MI-15?  Did they just decide to use two identical colors next to each other?

There's is at least athsetically better.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #390 on: June 30, 2011, 12:33:40 AM »

What do I see? The Dem map.

http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/mich_redistricting.pdf

Livingston County paired with Lansing.

Oakland County cut 5 ways.

Not even 1 district entirely within Wayne County.

Oakland to Macomb double cross.

That's almost as bad as the Republican map. In fact, in some places, it's worse.

Yeah, that's a fail.  They seem to have copied literally all of the outstate regions from the Republican map.  Classy.

Well, hey, underscores why MI Dems are often just as bad as MI Reps.  I'm glad I voted Green for Governor Tongue

What's going on their in their MI-12 and MI-15?  Did they just decide to use two identical colors next to each other?

No, there is no MI-15.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #391 on: June 30, 2011, 09:24:37 AM »

What do I see? The Dem map.

http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/mich_redistricting.pdf

Livingston County paired with Lansing.

Oakland County cut 5 ways.

Not even 1 district entirely within Wayne County.

Oakland to Macomb double cross.

That's almost as bad as the Republican map. In fact, in some places, it's worse.

Yeah, that's a fail.  They seem to have copied literally all of the outstate regions from the Republican map.  Classy.

Well, hey, underscores why MI Dems are often just as bad as MI Reps.  I'm glad I voted Green for Governor Tongue

What's going on their in their MI-12 and MI-15?  Did they just decide to use two identical colors next to each other?

No, there is no MI-15.

So they just put the number 15 on the maps for funsies?  Ooookay.
Logged
dpmapper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #392 on: June 30, 2011, 10:25:20 PM »
« Edited: June 30, 2011, 11:40:09 PM by dpmapper »

All this Lansing talk gave me an idea.
 



If the GOP gets super ambitious, and still feels they can get away with one extra county split with a black district going from Wayne to the north, and McCotter is retiring, then here's a 10-4, with all 10 GOP seats between 48.5 and 51.5% Obama.  

Blue Northern Michigan: 49.9-48.3 O-M (Benishek)
Lavender Midland/Bay City: 50.3-47.9 O-M (Camp)
Red Holland/Muskegon: 48.5-49.9 O-M (Huizenga)
Purple Grand Rapids: 51.3-47.0 O-M (Amash)
Teal Kalamazoo: 51.5-46.9 O-M (Upton)
Lime Green southern seat: 49.4-48.8 O-M (Walberg)
Green thumb: 51.2-46.9 O-M (open)
Bluish gray St Clair/Macomb: 51.4-46.8 O-M (Miller)
Pink Oakland County: 50.8-47.6 O-M (Knollenberg to challenge Peters)
Grey Livingston County/Livonia/southern Wayne: 51.3-47.0 O-M (Rogers)

Levin and Dingell are both drawn into the tan district which is 54% black; the brown district is 53.5% black.  The yellow Lansing/Ann Arbor seat is wide open.  


Now that McCotter is definitely going for Pres I revisited this and did a bit of rejiggering (such as finding a way to give the Flint district less of upper Oakland and more of Farmington Hills, and putting the GOP parts of Dearborn into the grey district).  The basic map is still there but the new percentages are

Blue Northern Michigan: 50.1 Obama (Benishek)
Lavender Midland/Bay City: 50.1 Obama (Camp)
Red Holland/Muskegon: 50.2 Obama (Huizenga)
Purple Grand Rapids: 50.6 Obama (Amash)
Teal Kalamazoo: 50.8 Obama (Upton)
Lime Green southern seat: 49.4 Obama (Walberg)
Green thumb: 51.2 Obama (open)
Bluish gray St Clair/Macomb: 51.0 Obama (Miller)
Pink Oakland County: 50.7 Obama (Knollenberg to challenge Peters/Levin)
Grey Livingston County/Livonia/southern Wayne: 50.8 Obama (Rogers, possibly Dingell?)

So they're all +2 or +3 R in PVI, not that ugly, almost-minimal county splits, and, apart from the red district, the lime green district, and (especially) the thumb district, pretty good as far as COIs go.  
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #393 on: July 22, 2011, 01:44:55 PM »

Hopefully this might be the end of Conyers.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/59589.html

Combine that with a political class starting to tire of having the same representative for decades and a bevy of talent waiting in the wings, Democratic strategists say, and you’ve got the makings of a serious primary challenge.

“He can’t win that seat,” longtime Detroit Democratic consultant Adolph Mongo said.

“The question is still out if he’s even going to run in that new district,” said Democratic strategist Steve Hood.




I suppose he can just take the threatening route.


http://www.freep.com/article/20110622/NEWS06/110622011/With-maps-State-Senate-panel-approves-revamped-Michigan-districts

“The map you submitted is causing warfare in the city of Detroit,” said state Sen. Virgil Smith, D-Detroit.
Logged
dpmapper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #394 on: July 22, 2011, 02:18:09 PM »

I don't know... I think I'd rather have Conyers than Fieger.  *shudder*
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,136
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #395 on: July 22, 2011, 05:11:35 PM »

Conyers isn't going anywhere, he and Clarke will likely switch seats. Not that it matters much anyway, the seat still won't go Republican, so.....
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #396 on: July 22, 2011, 10:45:34 PM »

remind me to never hire the pollster who thinks Geoffrey Fieger could win a Congressional seat
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,074
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #397 on: July 23, 2011, 10:39:26 AM »

Yet another awesome map dpmapper, and I see you have mastered the Garden City trick.  Smiley  But per my eyes, I don't see any of Dearborn in the gray CD.  Is the county split count as low as your effort before the GOP map came out that seemed to not be as paranoid about it as we were?
Logged
dpmapper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #398 on: July 23, 2011, 11:06:33 AM »

That's because I didn't post the updated map.  Here's a pic of it:



No touch-point contiguity is needed for the Flint-Pontiac connection, even though it kind of looks that way.  There is one more county split between Wayne and Monroe/Oakland than is necessary, as in the real map. 
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,074
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #399 on: July 23, 2011, 11:52:25 AM »

Has McCotter committed not to run for his House seat even if his POTUS campaign stalls? 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 12 queries.