Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2014, 12:29:43 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections
| | |-+  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Tender Branson, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | | |-+  MT-PPP: All Republicans ahead of Obama
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MT-PPP: All Republicans ahead of Obama  (Read 2262 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32052
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« on: November 17, 2010, 02:39:06 pm »

Do you approve or disapprove of Barack Obama’s job performance?

41-54

...

Obama vs. Romney: 39-50
Obama vs. Huckabee: 41-51
Obama vs. Gingrich: 44-46
Obama vs. Palin: 45-47

...

Favorables:

Huckabee: 46-35
Romney: 38-39
Palin: 44-50
Gingrich: 34-47

...

Itīs a McCain+4 sample, with 38% Republicans, 32% Independents and 29% Democrats.

...

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MT_1117513.pdf
Logged
Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8410
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2010, 02:40:40 pm »
Ignore

No sh!t.

MT has the right idea about Romney.  They're the best state.
Logged

Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32052
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2010, 02:42:58 pm »

No sh!t.

MT has the right idea about Romney.  They're the best state.

Yeah, Mitt Romney also won there in 2008.
Logged
Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8410
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2010, 02:47:05 pm »
Ignore

Oh, it has plenty of Mormons, but Ron Paul came close behind in second.
Logged

Whacker77
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 756


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2010, 03:02:45 pm »
Ignore

Once again the favorables indicate the top four Republicans are hopelessly flawed.
Logged
Ben Romney
Hillary2012
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 397
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2010, 06:32:12 pm »
Ignore

If you want to be sure that Obama willw in re-election nominate Sarah Palin

Mitt Romney looks really good

but I would prefer Thune
Logged

I was anti-Obama before it was cool
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13660
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2010, 07:15:35 pm »
Ignore

Oh, it has plenty of Mormons, but Ron Paul came close behind in second.

It's only 3 or 4% Mormon, though I suppose "plenty" is subjective.

Ron Paul performed well due to what may have been the most restrictive caucus in the nation. He lost Montana's primary by over 50 points.
Logged

Odysseus
Scifiguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 879
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.19, S: -5.74

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2010, 07:19:05 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Q10 Who did you vote for President in 2008?

John McCain................................................... 47%
Barack Obama................................................ 43%
Someone else/Don't remember ...................... 10%

lol
Logged
feeblepizza
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3101
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2010, 07:26:32 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?
Logged

Odysseus
Scifiguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 879
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.19, S: -5.74

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2010, 07:28:34 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?

Uhh... No. This is Montana - the result was 49-47 in '08. I just thought it was rather remarkable that apparently 10% of the electorate either voted for Barr, Nader, or just completely "forgot" who they voted for.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6714


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2010, 07:29:27 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?

Uhh... No. This is Montana - the result was 49-47 in '08. I just thought it was rather remarkable that apparently 10% of the electorate either voted for Barr, Nader, or just completely "forgot" who they voted for.

Or they don't want to admit to a pollster who they voted for.
Logged
Fmr. President & Senator Polnut
polnut
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12520
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2010, 07:30:13 pm »
Ignore

I don't see how this is "wonderful news" Obama came close, but still didn't win in a SHOCKING year for the GOP... this is returning the presidential status quo for MT.

Those 3 EV were never being factored in.
Logged


Dogma is a comfortable thing, it saves you from thought - Sir Robert Menzies
Odysseus
Scifiguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 879
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.19, S: -5.74

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2010, 07:31:52 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?

Uhh... No. This is Montana - the result was 49-47 in '08. I just thought it was rather remarkable that apparently 10% of the electorate either voted for Barr, Nader, or just completely "forgot" who they voted for.

Or they don't want to admit to a pollster who they voted for.

Hence why "forgot" was in quotation marks.
Logged
Senator Libertas
Libertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14783
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -6.43

View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 17, 2010, 08:50:03 pm »
Ignore

This is truly wonderful news. And to Odysseus, couldn't the majority of those 10% that "didn't remember" have voted for Obama?

Uhh... No. This is Montana - the result was 49-47 in '08. I just thought it was rather remarkable that apparently 10% of the electorate either voted for Barr, Nader, or just completely "forgot" who they voted for.

Don't forget Ron Paul, who finished well ahead of Nader and Barr in Montana despite running no campaign and unsuccessfully requesting his name be removed from the ballot entirely. Wink

If Paul got 2.17% under those circumstances, really have to wonder how well he would have done if were actually a real candidate running a real campaign that year.
Logged
Mideast Assemblyman Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30380
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 17, 2010, 08:52:13 pm »
Ignore

If Paul got 2.17% under those circumstances, really have to wonder how well he would have done if were actually a real candidate running a real campaign that year.

Roll Eyes Sure, keep telling yourself that.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Senator Libertas
Libertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14783
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -6.43

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2010, 08:56:14 pm »
Ignore

If Paul got 2.17% under those circumstances, really have to wonder how well he would have done if were actually a real candidate running a real campaign that year.

Roll Eyes Sure, keep telling yourself that.

Keep telling myself what? You're saying Paul wouldn't have done any better as an actual candidate as opposed to being a non-candidate? Roll Eyes
Logged
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29640
United States
View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2010, 08:58:19 pm »
Ignore

If Paul got 2.17% under those circumstances, really have to wonder how well he would have done if were actually a real candidate running a real campaign that year.

If a candidate with unusually devoted support got 1-in-46 votes when his name was on the ballot?  I mean, wonder away, but.
Logged

n/c
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines