Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 20, 2013, 12:11:10 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
General Politics
Political Geography & Demographics
(Moderator:
muon2
)
US House Redistricting: California
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
[
16
]
17
18
Author
Topic: US House Redistricting: California (Read 24074 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29149
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #375 on:
August 24, 2011, 12:44:29 am »
Quote from: redcommander on August 23, 2011, 04:16:40 pm
Does anyone think the new 47th CD will become competitive? The commission drew it to include all of Long Beach, but it also includes the wealthy areas of Belmont, Naples, and Bixby Knolls, Los Alamitos (known for its military community), Cypress, Republican leaning parts of Garden Grove, and most of the Republican stronghold of Westminster. Plus Republicans recruited a top tier candidate in Gary DeLong who is a Long Beach Councilman.
Mill Valley laughs at the idea that wealthy areas in California are automatically Republican.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3852
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #376 on:
August 24, 2011, 01:28:29 am »
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on August 24, 2011, 12:44:29 am
Quote from: redcommander on August 23, 2011, 04:16:40 pm
Does anyone think the new 47th CD will become competitive? The commission drew it to include all of Long Beach, but it also includes the wealthy areas of Belmont, Naples, and Bixby Knolls, Los Alamitos (known for its military community), Cypress, Republican leaning parts of Garden Grove, and most of the Republican stronghold of Westminster. Plus Republicans recruited a top tier candidate in Gary DeLong who is a Long Beach Councilman.
Mill Valley laughs at the idea that wealthy areas in California are automatically Republican.
Well Long Beach isn't exactly a Santa Monica or Brentwood, so it is reasonable to suspect that there are Republican portions of it. It's not as if the city doesn't elect Republicans, since there is at least one one the city council (DeLong like I mentioned). I know it would be difficult, but the commission did design the district it looks like to be potentially competitive. Otherwise they would have kept Long Beach in it, and added Carson or Lakewood in it, and left parts of Orange County out of it.
Logged
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12174
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #377 on:
August 25, 2011, 09:56:18 pm »
The district will be competitive only if all the stars align, or there is a swing back among the Socal upper classes towards the Republicans. It's certainly not out of the question. It's not a safe Dem district, but I would think the Republicans are winning the popular vote by at least 8-10 points for this district to be competitive.
Logged
Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
Posts: 2678
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #378 on:
August 25, 2011, 11:28:30 pm »
Long Beach has Republican pockets, particularly closer to Orange County, but it's still quite blue. It weighs very heavily on the district as a whole, even with Republican leaning areas in Orange.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 6944
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #379 on:
August 28, 2011, 08:47:00 am »
My first glance seems to still show that the districts are heavily weighted towards socioeconomic grouping without overly splitting counties. That's certainly a standard redistricting principle, but the natural tendency for socioeconomic groups to sort politically as well would tend to weaken competitiveness in such a plan. Is there a PVI analysis available online yet?
Logged
The high precision muon g-2 storage ring moving to Fermilab.
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24373
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #380 on:
August 29, 2011, 09:16:51 pm »
Quote from: redcommander on August 24, 2011, 01:28:29 am
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on August 24, 2011, 12:44:29 am
Quote from: redcommander on August 23, 2011, 04:16:40 pm
Does anyone think the new 47th CD will become competitive? The commission drew it to include all of Long Beach, but it also includes the wealthy areas of Belmont, Naples, and Bixby Knolls, Los Alamitos (known for its military community), Cypress, Republican leaning parts of Garden Grove, and most of the Republican stronghold of Westminster. Plus Republicans recruited a top tier candidate in Gary DeLong who is a Long Beach Councilman.
Mill Valley laughs at the idea that wealthy areas in California are automatically Republican.
Well Long Beach isn't exactly a Santa Monica or Brentwood, so it is reasonable to suspect that there are Republican portions of it. It's not as if the city doesn't elect Republicans, since there is at least one one the city council (DeLong like I mentioned). I know it would be difficult, but the commission did design the district it looks like to be potentially competitive. Otherwise they would have kept Long Beach in it, and added Carson or Lakewood in it, and left parts of Orange County out of it.
The Commission should be ashamed of itself for drawing this non "communities of interest" cf, but here you go: Dem PVI of about +6% - out of reach for the Pubbies absent unusual circumstances. I am about 18,000 residents short even though the block groups don't match the voting districts, and I spilled over the lines a bit where the voting districts were chopped, and
still
came up short, but it should not make much difference.
«
Last Edit: August 29, 2011, 09:44:46 pm by Torie
»
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24373
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #381 on:
August 29, 2011, 09:19:58 pm »
Quote from: muon2 on August 28, 2011, 08:47:00 am
My first glance seems to still show that the districts are heavily weighted towards socioeconomic grouping without overly splitting counties. That's certainly a standard redistricting principle, but the natural tendency for socioeconomic groups to sort politically as well would tend to weaken competitiveness in such a plan. Is there a PVI analysis available online yet?
Yes, this might be coined the "class warfare" map. I was amazed how much economic segregation was emphasized really. In California class does not a community of interest make really. Malibu does not equal Hancock Park, and Silverlake/Los Feliz (gay young Hollywood hip) does not equal La Canada/Flintridge (Jet Propulsion Laboratory grayish haired brainiac nerd types), and on and on.
«
Last Edit: August 29, 2011, 09:23:26 pm by Torie
»
Logged
jimrtex
YaBB God
Posts: 5089
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #382 on:
August 30, 2011, 05:51:25 am »
Quote from: Torie on August 29, 2011, 09:19:58 pm
Quote from: muon2 on August 28, 2011, 08:47:00 am
My first glance seems to still show that the districts are heavily weighted towards socioeconomic grouping without overly splitting counties. That's certainly a standard redistricting principle, but the natural tendency for socioeconomic groups to sort politically as well would tend to weaken competitiveness in such a plan. Is there a PVI analysis available online yet?
Yes, this might be coined the "class warfare" map. I was amazed how much economic segregation was emphasized really. In California class does not a community of interest make really. Malibu does not equal Hancock Park, and Silverlake/Los Feliz (gay young Hollywood hip) does not equal La Canada/Flintridge (Jet Propulsion Laboratory grayish haired brainiac nerd types), and on and on.
It was one of the fixups that got added when they added congressional redistricting.
Before it just said "community of interest". The added language included income, and some of the other interests are less measurable.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3852
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #383 on:
August 30, 2011, 01:10:08 pm »
Quote from: Torie on August 29, 2011, 09:16:51 pm
Quote from: redcommander on August 24, 2011, 01:28:29 am
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on August 24, 2011, 12:44:29 am
Quote from: redcommander on August 23, 2011, 04:16:40 pm
Does anyone think the new 47th CD will become competitive? The commission drew it to include all of Long Beach, but it also includes the wealthy areas of Belmont, Naples, and Bixby Knolls, Los Alamitos (known for its military community), Cypress, Republican leaning parts of Garden Grove, and most of the Republican stronghold of Westminster. Plus Republicans recruited a top tier candidate in Gary DeLong who is a Long Beach Councilman.
Mill Valley laughs at the idea that wealthy areas in California are automatically Republican.
Well Long Beach isn't exactly a Santa Monica or Brentwood, so it is reasonable to suspect that there are Republican portions of it. It's not as if the city doesn't elect Republicans, since there is at least one one the city council (DeLong like I mentioned). I know it would be difficult, but the commission did design the district it looks like to be potentially competitive. Otherwise they would have kept Long Beach in it, and added Carson or Lakewood in it, and left parts of Orange County out of it.
The Commission should be ashamed of itself for drawing this non "communities of interest" cf, but here you go: Dem PVI of about +6% - out of reach for the Pubbies absent unusual circumstances. I am about 18,000 residents short even though the block groups don't match the voting districts, and I spilled over the lines a bit where the voting districts were chopped, and
still
came up short, but it should not make much difference.
If the district was under these lines in 2004, would it have voted for Bush?
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11595
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #384 on:
August 30, 2011, 01:54:35 pm »
Very unlikely since the Long Beach portion would be fiercely partisan.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
Posts: 16900
Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #385 on:
August 30, 2011, 03:19:38 pm »
Also, Vietnamese voters swung significantly to the right in 2008 due to McCain on the ticket (Vietnam veteran), and had been somewhat more D than usual in 2004 due to Kerry being a vet.
Logged
BigSkyBob
YaBB God
Posts: 2223
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #386 on:
August 30, 2011, 04:55:47 pm »
Quote from: Revivalism Revivalist on August 30, 2011, 03:19:38 pm
Also, Vietnamese voters swung significantly to the right in 2008 due to McCain on the ticket (Vietnam veteran), and had been somewhat more D than usual in 2004 due to Kerry being a vet.
Republicans run better among Cubans and Vietnamese for the same basic reason: the Democratic party delivered their fellow countrymen into repressive dictatorships. During the war, Kerry de facto gave aid and comfort to those would-be dictators. Whatever the reason Kerry ran better in 2004 is, it is not his service in Vietnam.
Logged
The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24373
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #387 on:
August 30, 2011, 05:13:51 pm »
Long Beach swung at about the rate of the nation average - about 5% Dem from Kerry to Obama, and from about 65.6% Kerry to 71.0% Obama. So not much trend in that town. It's about two thirds of CA-47 now.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3852
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #388 on:
August 30, 2011, 05:50:50 pm »
Are there any other possibly competitive seats that no one has brought up yet? How blue is the new CA-36? What about CA-44? Sorry, I would look up the voting stats on the Dave's redistricting app, but my computer keeps crashing when I open the website up.
Logged
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12174
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #389 on:
August 30, 2011, 08:59:54 pm »
Quote from: Revivalism Revivalist on August 30, 2011, 03:19:38 pm
Also, Vietnamese voters swung significantly to the right in 2008 due to McCain on the ticket (Vietnam veteran), and had been somewhat more D than usual in 2004 due to Kerry being a vet.
Are you sure about this? IIRC Garden Grove and Westminster swung pretty heavily towards Obama, as did the rest of Orange county of course. I could be wrong though, so let me know if I am.
Logged
nclib
YaBB God
Posts: 8493
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #390 on:
August 30, 2011, 09:12:33 pm »
The old CA-47 swung strongly GOP in 2004 and DEM in 2008. IIRC, this CD has the most Vietnamese.
Logged
[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)
"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11595
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #391 on:
August 30, 2011, 10:48:17 pm »
I expect the Long Beaches swing to be a result of increased Black turnout as opposed to actual swing voters.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
jimrtex
YaBB God
Posts: 5089
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #392 on:
August 31, 2011, 04:15:03 am »
A proposed petition for a referendum on the congressional plan has been filed with the AG. If sufficient signatures are gathered, the plan would be suspended until after the next statewide election at which the referendum would be voted on, presumably at the June 2012 primary.
If the plans are suspended, then the primaries can not be used to choose the 2 candidates who advance to the general election.
Maybe they will be held as special elections in November 2012, like has been done in Texas.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3852
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #393 on:
August 31, 2011, 05:47:31 am »
Quote from: jimrtex on August 31, 2011, 04:15:03 am
A proposed petition for a referendum on the congressional plan has been filed with the AG. If sufficient signatures are gathered, the plan would be suspended until after the next statewide election at which the referendum would be voted on, presumably at the June 2012 primary.
If the plans are suspended, then the primaries can not be used to choose the 2 candidates who advance to the general election.
Maybe they will be held as special elections in November 2012, like has been done in Texas.
I seriously hope voters yet again keep Republicans on a lifeline by defeating that initiative. Sometimes I wonder if California Republicans actually want to win elections again.
«
Last Edit: August 31, 2011, 05:52:00 am by redcommander
»
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24373
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #394 on:
August 31, 2011, 09:22:58 am »
I doubt if the petition will go anywhere.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3852
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #395 on:
August 31, 2011, 03:40:03 pm »
http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.com/
http://elections.dailykos.com/
Rothenberg has a new analysis of possible candidates for the Dems and GOP in the California house races. Right now it's only open to subscribers though, but the Daily Kos has an outline listing of some of the candidate that Gonzales spoke about. Personally I hope Linda Parks runs in the 26th, seeing as she would bring much needed moderation to the congressional delegation if she won.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24373
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #396 on:
September 02, 2011, 05:07:18 pm »
CA-31 is a Dem lean marginal in case anyone is interested (+3.3% Dem PVI) . The City of Riverside/Moreno Valley/Perris CD is another +6% or so Dem PVI CD.
CA-31 is the seat Baca might run in against Lewis. It is rated as toss-up/tilt Dem by Rothenberg, which seems about right.
«
Last Edit: September 02, 2011, 05:12:41 pm by Torie
»
Logged
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12174
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #397 on:
September 03, 2011, 02:44:30 pm »
Yeah that district 31 is an interesting district. Another one of those swing districts. I more or less approve though San Bernardino and Colton would fit in better into the 35th.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
Posts: 2055
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #398 on:
September 16, 2011, 03:26:38 am »
had prop 20 not been passed here is what the central valley would look like IMO:
District 11 is the white areas of Stockton and Modesto connected by some mountain counties. This is 57 percent white, 53 percent McCain. Dick Pombo probably runs here.
District 18 is a Stockton, Modesto, Merced district. In all my dem districts I made sure not a single precinct had a white majority. District 18 is plurality hispanic (47 or 48 percent) and around 15 percent Asian. Obama got 64 percent there. This would be Cardoza's district.
District 19 is the white areas of Tulare, King, Fresno, and Madera and Mariposa counties. Devin Nunes and Jeff Denham have been drawn together in this 55 percent white, 60 percent McCain district.
District 20 is a Fresno/Madera district. It is around 60 percent hispanic and Obama got about 61 percent here. Jim Costa would represent this district.
District 21 takes in parts of Tulare, Kings, Kern, and small port of Fresno county. It is probably in the top 10 poorest districts in the country. It is around 72 percent hispanic and Obama won here by six points. Andy Vidak probably runs against Mike Rubio here.
District 22 takes in most of Bakersfield and parts of SLO County. It is 53 percent white and 60-61 percent McCain. McCarthy would run there.
Logged
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12174
Re: US House Redistricting: California
«
Reply #399 on:
September 16, 2011, 12:58:25 pm »
Nice gerrymander. I have a nice Dem gerrymander basically done that I will post soon. Hispanics probably wouldn't like it too much though.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
[
16
]
17
18
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...