Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 25, 2013, 09:08:14 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Congressional Elections
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
8
9
10
...
14
Author
Topic: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge (Read 19318 times)
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Sestak: "Casey is a good Senator"...but doesn't totally rule out a run.
«
Reply #100 on:
December 20, 2010, 04:29:03 pm »
http://www.politicspa.com/sestak-throws-water-on-senate-2012-rumors/19404/
Not a total dismissal yet.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Senator Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
Posts: 11027
Political Matrix
E: -7.24, S: -3.13
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #101 on:
December 20, 2010, 04:54:11 pm »
Bob Casey 2016, anyone?
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on May 24, 2013, 02:30:04 pm
Anyway, does it really matter at this point? I still lost 2 pounds as a result of the 4 sloppy joes.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #102 on:
December 20, 2010, 05:05:06 pm »
Quote from: Snowstalker on December 20, 2010, 04:54:11 pm
Bob Casey 2016, anyone?
You mean Sestak? It might be too long for him but who knows? If Casey is re-elected in 2012, he's going for Governor in 2018 to round out his political career with the only job he has truly wanted.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Senator Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
Posts: 11027
Political Matrix
E: -7.24, S: -3.13
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #103 on:
December 20, 2010, 07:02:07 pm »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on December 20, 2010, 05:05:06 pm
Quote from: Snowstalker on December 20, 2010, 04:54:11 pm
Bob Casey 2016, anyone?
You mean Sestak? It might be too long for him but who knows? If Casey is re-elected in 2012, he's going for Governor in 2018 to round out his political career with the only job he has truly wanted.
I meant for President.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on May 24, 2013, 02:30:04 pm
Anyway, does it really matter at this point? I still lost 2 pounds as a result of the 4 sloppy joes.
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
Posts: 6298
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #104 on:
December 20, 2010, 09:39:10 pm »
Quote from: Snowstalker on December 20, 2010, 07:02:07 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on December 20, 2010, 05:05:06 pm
Quote from: Snowstalker on December 20, 2010, 04:54:11 pm
Bob Casey 2016, anyone?
You mean Sestak? It might be too long for him but who knows? If Casey is re-elected in 2012, he's going for Governor in 2018 to round out his political career with the only job he has truly wanted.
I meant for President.
Casey doesn't want 2 b n the white house
Logged
George Deukmjican will become to next President of the United States. You must read it to believe it.
Duekmjican: 287
Bradley: 241
Paul: 0
"So, I leave you all tonight with a full heart and a fervent prayer that we will meet again and we will meet often in this land where miracles are always happening, where every day is a new beginning and every life a blessing from God.
So I want to say thanks to each one of you here. Thank y
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #105 on:
December 20, 2010, 10:01:35 pm »
Quote from: Snowstalker on December 20, 2010, 07:02:07 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on December 20, 2010, 05:05:06 pm
Quote from: Snowstalker on December 20, 2010, 04:54:11 pm
Bob Casey 2016, anyone?
You mean Sestak? It might be too long for him but who knows? If Casey is re-elected in 2012, he's going for Governor in 2018 to round out his political career with the only job he has truly wanted.
I meant for President.
...
The GOP would never get that lucky.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
Posts: 6854
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #106 on:
December 20, 2010, 10:52:40 pm »
Hmm, I just realized something. Three of the 12 Democrats left in McCain districts are in PA: Holden, Critz, and Altmire. Meanwhile, four Republicans in PA are in districts Obama carried by double-digits: Gerlach, Meehan, Barletta, and Dent. That's kind of funny, in a way.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68072
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #107 on:
December 20, 2010, 10:59:03 pm »
Quote from: JohnnyLongtorso on December 20, 2010, 10:52:40 pm
Hmm, I just realized something. Three of the 12 Democrats left in McCain districts are in PA: Holden, Critz, and Altmire. Meanwhile, four Republicans in PA are in districts Obama carried by double-digits: Gerlach, Meehan, Barletta, and Dent. That's kind of funny, in a way.
What are the other 9 Dems in McCain districts?
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24391
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #108 on:
December 21, 2010, 01:16:36 am »
Quote from: I Know What A Lion Is on December 20, 2010, 10:59:03 pm
Quote from: JohnnyLongtorso on December 20, 2010, 10:52:40 pm
Hmm, I just realized something. Three of the 12 Democrats left in McCain districts are in PA: Holden, Critz, and Altmire. Meanwhile, four Republicans in PA are in districts Obama carried by double-digits: Gerlach, Meehan, Barletta, and Dent. That's kind of funny, in a way.
What are the other 9 Dems in McCain districts?
Off the top, Matheson, Boren, Marshall (?), somebody left in Texas?, Ross in Arkansas, Critz (?), Rahall, well, I am getting tired. You know the zones to look at. How about KY-6?
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
Posts: 6854
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #109 on:
December 21, 2010, 08:06:58 am »
Dan Boren, Jim Matheson, Mike Ross, Nick Rahall, Gabrielle Giffords, Collin Peterson, Ben Chandler, Mike McIntyre, and Heath Shuler.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68072
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #110 on:
December 21, 2010, 10:49:21 pm »
So Giffords is now the most liberal Dem surviving in a McCain district. Not really surprising actually (her district would be an Obama one in any other state though granted.)
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11588
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #111 on:
December 25, 2010, 10:30:10 pm »
What about Jim Matthews?
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #112 on:
December 26, 2010, 12:03:08 am »
Quote from: Napoleon on December 25, 2010, 10:30:10 pm
What about Jim Matthews?
...
Without going into detail (you really have to be involved or follow local politics here to understand), I can say it is one of the safest bets out there that Jim Matthews won't ever stand a chance in statewide
Republican
politics ever again. It's very unlikely that he'll even survive his challenge next year. He is very unpopular with both parties but especially with the GOP after some of the stuff he pulled after he was re-elected in 2007.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #113 on:
January 06, 2011, 12:44:10 am »
Casey's approval rating remains in the low 40s -
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/regional/s_716843.html
"(Casey) went into Washington with all kinds of ideas, but once he got elected, I feel like we never heard from him again," said Joyce Keith, 57, a Democrat from McKeesport.
I actually was cornered into meeting and shaking hands with Casey today outside of Toomey's reception. I'm sure you can just imagine how weird that was for me.
He was actually literally two feet from Santorum and they awkwardly bumped into each other. Surprisingly, they are apparently very friendly to each other.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 8542
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #114 on:
January 06, 2011, 08:44:43 am »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on January 06, 2011, 12:44:10 am
Casey's approval rating remains in the low 40s -
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/regional/s_716843.html
"(Casey) went into Washington with all kinds of ideas, but once he got elected, I feel like we never heard from him again," said Joyce Keith, 57, a Democrat from McKeesport.
I actually was cornered into meeting and shaking hands with Casey today outside of Toomey's reception. I'm sure you can just imagine how weird that was for me.
He was actually literally two feet from Santorum and they awkwardly bumped into each other. Surprisingly, they are apparently very friendly to each other.
Two senators from the same state, they almost need to be to bring home buck$. That isn't always the case, of course, but it helps.
Oh, and his disapproval rating is only 27%. I'd like to know how much of the 30% undecided is actually "mixed opinion" vs. "no opinion". If I had to hazard a guess I'd say largely the latter.
«
Last Edit: January 06, 2011, 08:47:54 am by Badger
»
Logged
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
Posts: 11992
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #115 on:
January 06, 2011, 09:45:13 am »
Quote from: Badger on January 06, 2011, 08:44:43 am
Oh, and his disapproval rating is only 27%.
LOL, that's a significant fact to include. Boehner and Pelosi have comparable approval ratings--I think he has 36% to her 34%--and I was all set to post a sarcastic "Dump Boehner now! Save the Republican majority!" post until I saw that his disapprovals were in the 20s while hers were close to 50.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #116 on:
January 06, 2011, 02:04:51 pm »
Quote from: brittain33 on January 06, 2011, 09:45:13 am
Boehner and Pelosi have comparable approval ratings--I think he has 36% to her 34%
Totally irrelevant since the country doesn't vote for either of those individuals.
Quote from: Badger on January 06, 2011, 08:44:43 am
Two senators from the same state, they almost need to be to bring home buck$. That isn't always the case, of course, but it helps.
I wasn't saying it was odd that Casey was there. I expected it.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
freepcrusher
YaBB God
Posts: 2063
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #117 on:
January 06, 2011, 05:28:11 pm »
Keystone, I find the need to call you out. You do realize that Casey unseated an incumbent by 17 points? Add that Pennsylvania hasn't voted for a republican nationally since 1988 and that 2012 won't be anywhere as bad as 2010 and he's pretty much safe. Did I not mention he is family royalty.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #118 on:
January 06, 2011, 05:38:39 pm »
Quote from: freepcrusher on January 06, 2011, 05:28:11 pm
Keystone, I find the need to call you out. You do realize that Casey unseated an incumbent by 17 points? Add that Pennsylvania hasn't voted for a republican nationally since 1988 and that 2012 won't be anywhere as bad as 2010 and he's pretty much safe. Did I not mention he is family royalty.
No, I haven't realized that.
Yes, he beat a very controversial Senator in a Democratic wave year. Yes, thank you for reminding me that he's family royalty. Now time for me to call you out: Casey winning by seventeen points in 2006 doesn't affect 2012. I'm not saying 2012 will be as bad as 2010 but you shouldn't be saying it definitely won't be. We don't know what it will be.
If Obama is unpopular, he can lose Pennsylvania and take Casey with him since Casey has been so close to the President. Casey also is finally in a position where he has to perform. Read the article. More people are saying they haven't heard much from the guy. This isn't like being State Treasurer where he got away with doing nothing. During these are times when people are paying more attention to what their members are doing in Congress and Casey isn't performing. He's irritating moderate to conservative Independents and even Republicans that supported him in the past. Also, to be rather blunt about this, the people that still think he is Casey, Sr. are dying off.
All of that having been said, I'm simply pointing out his weaknesses and the fact that he'll be targeted. Everywhere I have posted, I have said it is an uphill battle for a challenger. Casey definitely has advantages but you're out of it if you think he's "pretty much safe" with the voting record he has built and the fact that this is Pennsylvania.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11588
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #119 on:
January 06, 2011, 06:44:51 pm »
The other wildcard is if the GOP nominee is someone pro-choice like Gerlach. With Casey being pro-life, things could get interesting.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #120 on:
January 06, 2011, 06:52:19 pm »
Quote from: Napoleon on January 06, 2011, 06:44:51 pm
The other wildcard is if the GOP nominee is someone pro-choice like Gerlach. With Casey being pro-life, things could get interesting.
Gerlach is Pro Life.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11588
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #121 on:
January 06, 2011, 06:56:51 pm »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on January 06, 2011, 06:52:19 pm
Quote from: Napoleon on January 06, 2011, 06:44:51 pm
The other wildcard is if the GOP nominee is someone pro-choice like Gerlach. With Casey being pro-life, things could get interesting.
Gerlach is Pro Life.
I guess I made assumptions based on his membership in the Republican Main Street Partnership but I somehow doubt he is pro-life in the sense that Toomey and Santorum are, or else he would lose in the 6th.
What about Tom Ridge? He seems like he actually would be favored over Casey.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49406
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #122 on:
January 06, 2011, 07:09:23 pm »
Quote from: Napoleon on January 06, 2011, 06:56:51 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on January 06, 2011, 06:52:19 pm
Quote from: Napoleon on January 06, 2011, 06:44:51 pm
The other wildcard is if the GOP nominee is someone pro-choice like Gerlach. With Casey being pro-life, things could get interesting.
Gerlach is Pro Life.
I guess I made assumptions based on his membership in the Republican Main Street Partnership but I somehow doubt he is pro-life in the sense that Toomey and Santorum are, or else he would lose in the 6th.
Being vocally Pro Life really wouldn't cost him that seat. The people voting on that weren't voting for him anyway.
Quote
What about Tom Ridge? He seems like he actually would be favored over Casey.
He won't run. He'll be too old and he has no desire to be there. It would easily be the most boring major Senate race we would see in 2012.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
Posts: 27456
Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: -6.09
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #123 on:
January 07, 2011, 09:43:39 am »
Regardless of Casey's ties to Obama (assuming in 2012 that will hurt him with another push to unseat incumbents) it will still take a formidible GOP challenger to unseat him, IMO.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on May 23, 2013, 11:03:29 am
I'm not going to follow all of her advice as she wants me to stay within 1500-1800 calories. That is just not going to happen.
Quote from: politicus on May 24, 2013, 03:30:51 pm
The upper class gay Californian wins AL, MS and SC?
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21045
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #124 on:
January 07, 2011, 01:05:58 pm »
Quote from: Napoleon on January 06, 2011, 06:56:51 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on January 06, 2011, 06:52:19 pm
Quote from: Napoleon on January 06, 2011, 06:44:51 pm
The other wildcard is if the GOP nominee is someone pro-choice like Gerlach. With Casey being pro-life, things could get interesting.
Gerlach is Pro Life.
I guess I made assumptions based on his membership in the Republican Main Street Partnership but I somehow doubt he is pro-life in the sense that Toomey and Santorum are, or else he would lose in the 6th.
What about Tom Ridge? He seems like he actually would be favored over Casey.
I wouldn't do that on a regular basis. There are some members of the Main Street Partnership that are also in the Republican Study Committee.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
Pages:
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
8
9
10
...
14
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...