Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 19, 2013, 02:02:47 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Congressional Elections
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
[
9
]
10
11
12
13
14
Author
Topic: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge (Read 19558 times)
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #200 on:
December 27, 2011, 12:36:19 pm »
Quote from: Tender Branson on December 27, 2011, 11:29:53 am
Phil might find this interesting (or not, since it is an internal):
http://www.politicspa.com/smith-internal-poll-smith-leads-senate-primary/30352/
I saw.
It's all over Facebook when you have political friends that are working for Smith's campaign.
I believe the numbers but they're probably a bit inflated for Smith. He's already running ads so that has helped build his name recognition. It looks like good news for everyone else especially Welch. This is a wide open race. Good to see my top three candidates polling within the top four spots.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #201 on:
January 04, 2012, 11:24:04 am »
Smith has a whopping $4.4 million on hand.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #202 on:
January 08, 2012, 11:49:22 am »
Tim Burns won the Central PA State Committee straw poll yesterday.
Burns - 32
Rohrer - 22
Welch - 22
Smith - 20
Christian - 2
Scaringi - 1
The "others" should be dropping out shortly with petition circulation season beginning in two weeks. This is clearly a four man race: Rohrer, Smith, Burns and Welch.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #203 on:
January 13, 2012, 11:16:19 pm »
Cummings has dropped out and endorsed Burns. Not that it matters. She wasn't a factor anyway.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #204 on:
January 14, 2012, 03:20:13 pm »
Welch won the Northeast PA State Committee Caucus straw poll with 44% of the vote. Not sure on the exact breakdown but Welch getting that much support in a crowded field is impressive. Kind of surprising that Rohrer didn't win there.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #205 on:
January 18, 2012, 09:01:48 pm »
Continuing with the "Phil talks to himself" thread...
In a blow to Welch, the Southeast caucus voted tonight to not endorse in the Senate race. This is probably because of fellow SE PA candidate David Christian who, somewhat surprisingly, had a Super PAC swoop in to help him out by attacking Welch and Smith in a series of mailers to State Committee members.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Corbett backs Welch.
«
Reply #206 on:
January 19, 2012, 10:55:02 am »
The Governor apparently started calling party leaders yesterday, asking them to support Welch. It wasn't enough to sway the SE caucus but this is a big boost for Welch overall. This likely means an endorsement from State Committee.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #207 on:
January 28, 2012, 12:15:14 pm »
State Committee is holding its endorsement vote right now. Welch is expected to get it thanks to some serious arm twisting by the Governor (I saw some of it first hand when I was up there last night). Not sure why Corbett is pushing so hard for it but he is. This will be a big boost to Welch but Smith will be staying in regardless. Same with Rohrer (but that's understood). Burns might be out.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #208 on:
January 28, 2012, 12:25:05 pm »
Despite the best efforts of almost every candidate other than Welch, the motion to endorse has passed. Welch should have this locked up.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
Posts: 6854
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #209 on:
January 28, 2012, 02:45:36 pm »
Which one is Welch? The one who made the aborted run for PA-06 in 2010?
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #210 on:
January 28, 2012, 04:34:24 pm »
Welch officially endorsed. No word on whether or not Burns is out.
Quote from: JohnnyLongtorso on January 28, 2012, 02:45:36 pm
Which one is Welch? The one who made the aborted run for PA-06 in 2010?
He ran and dropped out in PA 6
and
PA 7 in 2010.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Burns bails.
«
Reply #211 on:
February 02, 2012, 01:47:33 pm »
Tim Burns has dropped out.
I only have to choose between Welch and Smith now but I'm even more undecided than ever before.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #212 on:
March 14, 2012, 09:56:49 am »
Quinnipiac - Casey has a 46% to 27% approval rating. He has a surprising high 31% approval rating amongst Republicans (there's that Casey name!) but only 8% would vote for him. He leads a hypothetical Republican by twelve - 46% to 34%. 48% say he deserves re-election. In other news, Toomey has a 42% to 28% approval rating.
«
Last Edit: March 14, 2012, 10:24:47 am by Keystone Phil
»
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #213 on:
March 14, 2012, 08:14:17 pm »
PPP showing the typical Casey lukewarm ratings (especially with Dems) as well. Rohrer leading in the primary with about half undecided. I'll post the poll in the poll board...until noticing that Inks did it.
«
Last Edit: March 14, 2012, 08:19:32 pm by Keystone Phil
»
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Santorum makes his way into first 2012 PA Senate TV ad.
«
Reply #214 on:
March 27, 2012, 09:56:26 am »
Welch incorporates Santorum in his first TV ad -
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Di34-wlq4TB0&v=i34-wlq4TB0&gl=US
Very wise strategic move for a candidate with problems with most of the base. I guess it also helps that Welch's media consultant is also Santorum's but I believe Welch's people also have ties to the Romney campaign.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3844
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #215 on:
March 28, 2012, 08:06:02 pm »
Do you know why Welch became a Republican? I read that he was formerly a Democrat.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #216 on:
March 28, 2012, 09:52:01 pm »
Quote from: redcommander on March 28, 2012, 08:06:02 pm
Do you know why Welch became a Republican? I read that he was formerly a Democrat.
He was a Republican then switched to Dem in 2008 to vote for Obama in the primary (says he became disillusioned with the GOP on spending matters). He switched back to Republican and voted for McCain but the Obama vote is obviously pissing a lot of people off. Also, while still a Republican, he helped Sestak in 2006.
Welch ran into even more trouble when the Governor claimed that Welch switched as part of Operation Chaos. The problem? Operation Chaos was for people to vote for Hillary, not Obama. This gaffe has hurt Welch even more.
I'm thrilled to be going to the Senate debate next week here in Philly. It's the first time I'll be hearing from the candidates in a debate. Here's hoping I'll decide on a candidate by this time next week.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Senator Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
Posts: 11276
Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -2.96
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #217 on:
March 31, 2012, 03:39:37 pm »
Logged
Democrats are out of power
Across that great wide ocean
Reagan's president elect
Fascist god in motion
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #218 on:
April 04, 2012, 07:49:38 am »
Debate tonight at the Union League. I serve on the board of one of the groups that is hosting so I'll be there and hope to finally get a good idea as to whom I'll be supporting. If you're a Pennsylvanian and watch to watch, tune into PCN at 6:30.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #219 on:
April 04, 2012, 06:47:18 pm »
Rohrer has a Perry-esque moment. Freezes for awhile when asked to name a time when Casey was socially liberal, then mentions Obamacare, then freezes again and admits he was caught off guard. Ouch.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #220 on:
April 04, 2012, 07:54:10 pm »
Smith: "...Specter ran in 2010?"
Wow. Rohrer didn't have the biggest gaffe tonight. This is horrible. He doesn't remember candidates he voted for and then asked what Welch had for breakfast three weeks ago. Terrible attempt at a save. Your votes are a little more important, Tom.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3844
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #221 on:
April 05, 2012, 01:10:45 am »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on April 04, 2012, 07:54:10 pm
Smith: "...Specter ran in 2010?"
Wow. Rohrer didn't have the biggest gaffe tonight. This is horrible. He doesn't remember candidates he voted for and then asked what Welch had for breakfast three weeks ago. Terrible attempt at a save. Your votes are a little more important, Tom.
I don't trust Welch or his reasons for changing his voter registration. And Rohrer seems to much in the mold of the Buck and Angle, and we all know how their races went. Is there anyone remotely electable even running? What about that former Santorum aide?
Logged
smoltchanov
YaBB God
Posts: 504
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #222 on:
April 05, 2012, 02:54:20 am »
Quote from: redcommander on April 05, 2012, 01:10:45 am
I don't trust Welch or his reasons for changing his voter registration. And Rohrer seems to much in the mold of the Buck and Angle, and we all know how their races went. Is there anyone remotely electable even running? What about that former Santorum aide?
You consider him electable? Even remotely???
Logged
Raging moderate. Big lover of "mavericks" (in all parties) and big non-lover of "reliable foot soldiers" (in all parties as well). Political Matrix - E: -0.26, S: -3.48
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49614
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #223 on:
April 05, 2012, 02:59:16 am »
Quote from: redcommander on April 05, 2012, 01:10:45 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on April 04, 2012, 07:54:10 pm
Smith: "...Specter ran in 2010?"
Wow. Rohrer didn't have the biggest gaffe tonight. This is horrible. He doesn't remember candidates he voted for and then asked what Welch had for breakfast three weeks ago. Terrible attempt at a save. Your votes are a little more important, Tom.
I don't trust Welch or his reasons for changing his voter registration. And Rohrer seems to much in the mold of the Buck and Angle, and we all know how their races went. Is there anyone remotely electable even running? What about that former Santorum aide?
Rohrer is a very intelligent and articulate man. That said, I fear a very easy Casey win if he was the nominee. Scaringi - the former Santorum aide - isn't going to come close to winning the primary.
Logged
Support our boys in blue.
redcommander
YaBB God
Posts: 3844
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #224 on:
April 05, 2012, 03:03:41 am »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on April 05, 2012, 02:59:16 am
Quote from: redcommander on April 05, 2012, 01:10:45 am
Quote from: Keystone Phil on April 04, 2012, 07:54:10 pm
Smith: "...Specter ran in 2010?"
Wow. Rohrer didn't have the biggest gaffe tonight. This is horrible. He doesn't remember candidates he voted for and then asked what Welch had for breakfast three weeks ago. Terrible attempt at a save. Your votes are a little more important, Tom.
I don't trust Welch or his reasons for changing his voter registration. And Rohrer seems to much in the mold of the Buck and Angle, and we all know how their races went. Is there anyone remotely electable even running? What about that former Santorum aide?
Rohrer is a very intelligent and articulate man. That said, I fear a very easy Casey win if he was the nominee. Scaringi - the former Santorum aide - isn't going to come close to winning the primary.
What makes him unelectable?
Logged
Pages:
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
[
9
]
10
11
12
13
14
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...