|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
    
Posts: 21563


|
 |
« Reply #18 on: December 19, 2010, 07:48:30 pm » |
|
At round about what pop. figure would RI lose/MT regain its second seat?
assuming 309 mil. total population of 50 states, divided by 435 seats would mean 1 seat per approx. 760 K, so I would guess 1.04 mil would be the threshold for rounding up or down. For 309M an average seat is 710K, not 760K. Cutoff line between 1 and 2 seats using the current method is approximately √2 of a seat or 1004K. However, because people living in the territories and DC, as well as some people overseas don't count in the apportionment population, the apportionment population will be less than the overall population by several millions, so the cutoff will be around 990K instead.
|
| Logged |
 | “Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.” Clinton Lee Scott |
Read Fat Man on a Diet, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|