Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 20, 2013, 09:25:43 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2012 Elections
2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
(Moderators:
Tender Branson
,
Big DaddyTX
)
MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9% (Read 1589 times)
Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14691
MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
on:
December 03, 2010, 04:18:55 pm »
PPP poll of Montana:
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MT_1118.pdf
Sarah Palin 23%
Mike Huckabee 22%
Newt Gingrich 16%
Mitt Romney 12%
Ron Paul 9%
Tim Pawlenty 3%
John Thune 3%
Mitch Daniels 2%
favorable / unfavorable #s among GOP primary voters:
Sarah Palin 76%/18% for +58%.
Mike Huckabee 71%/16% for +55%.
Newt Gingrich 58%/21% for +37%.
Mitt Romney 58%/24% for +34%
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
Posts: 6701
Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #1 on:
December 03, 2010, 04:28:49 pm »
There are a lot of Mormons there. Great news for Sarah Palin. Bad news for that liar and hack Mitt Romney.
Logged
Jbrase
YaBB God
Posts: 4951
Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -6.09
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #2 on:
December 03, 2010, 04:30:41 pm »
Red- Giant Douche
;
Blue - Huck
,
Pink - Palin
;
Light Green - T-Paw
;
Green - Gingrich
«
Last Edit: December 03, 2010, 04:46:52 pm by Jbrase
»
Logged
Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14691
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #3 on:
December 03, 2010, 04:40:15 pm »
Quote from: Jbrase on December 03, 2010, 04:30:41 pm
Red- Giant Douche
;
Blue - Huck
,
Pink - Palin
;
Light Green - T-Paw
;
Green - Gingrich
They actually did a later poll of NC, which had Huckabee leading:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=128750.0
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Jbrase
YaBB God
Posts: 4951
Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -6.09
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #4 on:
December 03, 2010, 04:47:21 pm »
Quote from: Mr. Morden on December 03, 2010, 04:40:15 pm
Quote from: Jbrase on December 03, 2010, 04:30:41 pm
Red- Giant Douche
;
Blue - Huck
,
Pink - Palin
;
Light Green - T-Paw
;
Green - Gingrich
They actually did a later poll of NC, which had Huckabee leading:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=128750.0
Oh sweet, updated.
Logged
Poundingtherock
YaBB God
Posts: 922
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #5 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:13:30 pm »
Stick the fork in Romney. He won Montana in 2008 easily. Now he's polling with Ron Paul in a pretty good 545-voter sample.
"freed the slaves" is crying in his napkin.
Logged
crypto-fascist superhero
wormyguy
YaBB God
Posts: 7815
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: -7.65
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #6 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:27:44 pm »
That's a sh!tty result for Ron Paul.
Logged
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV6Bq8xeQrU
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
YaBB God
Posts: 9546
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #7 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:34:59 pm »
Quote from: Anybody But Palin on December 03, 2010, 04:28:49 pm
There are a lot of Mormons there. Great news for Sarah Palin.
Bad news for that liar and hack Mitt Romney.
Weren't you saying you'd be voting for Romney over Palin, Huckabee and Gingrich?
(and I agree with you this time, of course; just surprised that you've changed so quickly)
Logged
Quote from: independentTX on February 15, 2013, 01:44:08 am
Clearly the solution is to privatize presidential elections.
So, in less than four years, get excited for the 2016 MetLife Financial U Pick The Prez Extravaganza. If you tweet a picture of your completed ballot with the hashtag #ivoted, you could win a trip for two to the inauguration or an iTunes gift card.
Poundingtherock
YaBB God
Posts: 922
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #8 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:43:21 pm »
I think Hamilton was being sarcastic. Unfortunately, like his governor, he's not very good at being witty.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
Posts: 3647
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #9 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:47:53 pm »
Quote from: Jbrase on December 03, 2010, 04:47:21 pm
Quote from: Mr. Morden on December 03, 2010, 04:40:15 pm
Quote from: Jbrase on December 03, 2010, 04:30:41 pm
Red- Giant Douche
;
Blue - Huck
,
Pink - Palin
;
Light Green - T-Paw
;
Green - Gingrich
They actually did a later poll of NC, which had Huckabee leading:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=128750.0
Oh sweet, updated.
Huckabee was also leading in Missouri, I think. Good map
Logged
My avatar is as dark as my soul.
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
YaBB God
Posts: 9546
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #10 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:51:10 pm »
Quote from: Mr. Fuzzleton on December 03, 2010, 05:47:53 pm
Quote from: Jbrase on December 03, 2010, 04:47:21 pm
Quote from: Mr. Morden on December 03, 2010, 04:40:15 pm
Quote from: Jbrase on December 03, 2010, 04:30:41 pm
Red- Giant Douche
;
Blue - Huck
,
Pink - Palin
;
Light Green - T-Paw
;
Green - Gingrich
They actually did a later poll of NC, which had Huckabee leading:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=128750.0
Oh sweet, updated.
Huckabee was also leading in Missouri, I think. Good map
That was for the general election, not the primary. Although you do have a good idea! Let's start a general election map to see which Republican has the highest net-advantage over Obama.
Logged
Quote from: independentTX on February 15, 2013, 01:44:08 am
Clearly the solution is to privatize presidential elections.
So, in less than four years, get excited for the 2016 MetLife Financial U Pick The Prez Extravaganza. If you tweet a picture of your completed ballot with the hashtag #ivoted, you could win a trip for two to the inauguration or an iTunes gift card.
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
Posts: 6701
Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #11 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:52:31 pm »
Quote from: Poundingtherock on December 03, 2010, 05:43:21 pm
I think Hamilton was being sarcastic. Unfortunately, like his governor, he's not very good at being witty.
I much prefer him to a quitter.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14691
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #12 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:53:50 pm »
Quote from: Mideast Assemblyman True Conservative on December 03, 2010, 05:34:59 pm
Quote from: Anybody But Palin on December 03, 2010, 04:28:49 pm
There are a lot of Mormons there. Great news for Sarah Palin.
Bad news for that liar and hack Mitt Romney.
Weren't you saying you'd be voting for Romney over Palin, Huckabee and Gingrich?
(and I agree with you this time, of course; just surprised that you've changed so quickly)
That's just Rowan's valentine to the poster who thinks his name is Hamilton.
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
Posts: 8582
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -5.22
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #13 on:
December 03, 2010, 05:58:03 pm »
Is Montana going to have a primary or a caucus like in 2008?
Logged
Bob Findley
: "You're a real dyed-in-the-wool son-of-a-bitch. Anyone ever told you that?"
Steve Everett
: "Just close friends and family,"
Clint Eastwood's "True Crime", 1999.
Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14691
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #14 on:
December 03, 2010, 06:02:10 pm »
Quote from: px75 on December 03, 2010, 05:58:03 pm
Is Montana going to have a primary or a caucus like in 2008?
They've decided not to do the caucus this time. They'll allocate their delegates based on the primary, which won't be held until June, in the last week of primary season:
http://www.ballot-access.org/2010/06/18/montana-republicans-abandon-february-caucus-will-use-june-primary/
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Whacker77
YaBB God
Posts: 747
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #15 on:
December 03, 2010, 06:23:14 pm »
Is it possible that Romney might not run? The polling consensus of the polling data suggests to me he might not. He struggles nationally and doesn't seem to have a lead in states other than Mass. Having said that, I suspect Mitt runs, but if he doesn't, does that leave the door open for Jeb? Does that increase Palin's chances? Does Pence or Thune benefit? If Huck and Mitt hypothetically pass on the race, could you imagine a Sarah vs. Newt race? Barf! That's where Pence and Thune could make huge strides.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14691
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #16 on:
December 03, 2010, 06:34:25 pm »
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 06:23:14 pm
He struggles nationally
He's led 3 of the last 5 national polls (not counting the ever-unreliable Zogby Interactive), albeit not by very much. Even in the polls where he's not leading, he's been within four points of the lead in every single national poll taken in the last ten months.
Quote
and doesn't seem to have a lead in states other than Mass.
He's led in the most recent polls in CA, FL, MI, NV, and others. And oh yeah, he leads NH by more than 20 points. Clearly, he must be doomed.
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Poundingtherock
YaBB God
Posts: 922
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #17 on:
December 03, 2010, 06:44:07 pm »
What 3 polls? He led in Marist and Rasmussen. rasmussen had his difficulties in the midterms and Marist polled around 330 people and somehow found Rick Perry polling higher than Tim Pawlenty. What's the third poll that shows Romney in the lead?
That Michigan poll that he led in is from several months ago. I'm pretty sure he's still in the lead and if he's not, well, he might as well concede right now.
Whacker isn't a very intelligent guy. However, even he sees what everyone sees and that is Romney is fading pretty much everywhere.
Logged
Whacker77
YaBB God
Posts: 747
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #18 on:
December 03, 2010, 07:28:39 pm »
Quote from: Mr. Morden on December 03, 2010, 06:34:25 pm
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 06:23:14 pm
He struggles nationally
He's led 3 of the last 5 national polls (not counting the ever-unreliable Zogby Interactive), albeit not by very much. Even in the polls where he's not leading, he's been within four points of the lead in every single national poll taken in the last ten months.
Quote
and doesn't seem to have a lead in states other than Mass.
He's led in the most recent polls in CA, FL, MI, NV, and others. And oh yeah, he leads NH by more than 20 points. Clearly, he must be doomed.
Given his business experience and, more importantly, his current adversaries, he's struggling. To be tied, trailing, or barely leading a half term governor, an ethical cloud, and a Baptist minister is the definition of struggling. That's my view.
Logged
Whacker77
YaBB God
Posts: 747
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #19 on:
December 03, 2010, 07:35:48 pm »
Quote from: Poundingtherock on December 03, 2010, 06:44:07 pm
What 3 polls? He led in Marist and Rasmussen. rasmussen had his difficulties in the midterms and Marist polled around 330 people and somehow found Rick Perry polling higher than Tim Pawlenty. What's the third poll that shows Romney in the lead?
That Michigan poll that he led in is from several months ago. I'm pretty sure he's still in the lead and if he's not, well, he might as well concede right now.
Whacker isn't a very intelligent guy. However, even he sees what everyone sees and that is Romney is fading pretty much everywhere.
You are the most insufferable, conceited person I have come across on this board. What, no quip about not demonstrating independent thought? That's your tired critique of people who don't share your reasoned line of thinking. Do me a favor, put me on ignore so you won't see what I have written and I won't have to read your smarmy responses. Go back to watching Sarah Palin's Alaska.
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
Posts: 7553
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #20 on:
December 03, 2010, 07:45:23 pm »
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 07:28:39 pm
Quote from: Mr. Morden on December 03, 2010, 06:34:25 pm
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 06:23:14 pm
He struggles nationally
He's led 3 of the last 5 national polls (not counting the ever-unreliable Zogby Interactive), albeit not by very much. Even in the polls where he's not leading, he's been within four points of the lead in every single national poll taken in the last ten months.
Quote
and doesn't seem to have a lead in states other than Mass.
He's led in the most recent polls in CA, FL, MI, NV, and others. And oh yeah, he leads NH by more than 20 points. Clearly, he must be doomed.
Given his business experience and, more importantly, his current adversaries, he's struggling. To be tied, trailing, or barely leading a half term governor, an ethical cloud, and a Baptist minister is the definition of struggling. That's my view.
Business experience is almost completely irrelevant to success in high office. Experience in elected office, cabinet posts, and high-ranking military service is far more relevant to the Presidency.
Politicians of all kinds are now held in low esteem. Obama is more popular than either branch of Congress and both Parties in Congress, suggesting that he is doing relatively better than about anyone on the national scale. .
Logged
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49
A-Bob
YaBB God
Posts: 5891
Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 1.13
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #21 on:
December 03, 2010, 07:45:50 pm »
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 06:23:14 pm
Is it possible that Romney might not run? The polling consensus of the polling data suggests to me he might not. He struggles nationally and doesn't seem to have a lead in states other than Mass. Having said that, I suspect Mitt runs, but if he doesn't, does that leave the door open for Jeb? Does that increase Palin's chances? Does Pence or Thune benefit? If Huck and Mitt hypothetically pass on the race, could you imagine a Sarah vs. Newt race? Barf! That's where Pence and Thune could make huge strides.
No. There is no reason for him not to unless he's having an affair as we speak. He has already built his team, strategy, and money. Polls mean nothing, we all know that, especially this far out. YOu'd be a complete idiot to decide a run based on some state wide polling in caucus states none the less 2 years out for the primaries. It is impossible that he doesn't run.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
Posts: 8582
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -5.22
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #22 on:
December 03, 2010, 07:50:43 pm »
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 07:28:39 pm
Given his business experience and, more importantly, his current adversaries, he's struggling. To be tied, trailing, or barely leading a half term governor, an ethical cloud, and a Baptist minister is the definition of struggling. That's my view.
Hate to break it to you but Palin was also a Vice-Presidential candidate and Huckabee a 10-year governor.
Logged
Bob Findley
: "You're a real dyed-in-the-wool son-of-a-bitch. Anyone ever told you that?"
Steve Everett
: "Just close friends and family,"
Clint Eastwood's "True Crime", 1999.
Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14691
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #23 on:
December 03, 2010, 08:13:23 pm »
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 07:28:39 pm
Quote from: Mr. Morden on December 03, 2010, 06:34:25 pm
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 06:23:14 pm
He struggles nationally
He's led 3 of the last 5 national polls (not counting the ever-unreliable Zogby Interactive), albeit not by very much. Even in the polls where he's not leading, he's been within four points of the lead in every single national poll taken in the last ten months.
Quote
and doesn't seem to have a lead in states other than Mass.
He's led in the most recent polls in CA, FL, MI, NV, and others. And oh yeah, he leads NH by more than 20 points. Clearly, he must be doomed.
Given his business experience and, more importantly, his current adversaries, he's struggling. To be tied, trailing, or barely leading a half term governor, an ethical cloud, and a Baptist minister is the definition of struggling. That's my view.
OK, though I'm still confused on how you got "doesn't seem to have a lead in states other than Mass."
Quote from: Whacker77 on December 03, 2010, 07:35:48 pm
Quote from: Poundingtherock on December 03, 2010, 06:44:07 pm
What 3 polls? He led in Marist and Rasmussen. rasmussen had his difficulties in the midterms and Marist polled around 330 people and somehow found Rick Perry polling higher than Tim Pawlenty. What's the third poll that shows Romney in the lead?
That Michigan poll that he led in is from several months ago. I'm pretty sure he's still in the lead and if he's not, well, he might as well concede right now.
Whacker isn't a very intelligent guy. However, even he sees what everyone sees and that is Romney is fading pretty much everywhere.
You are the most insufferable, conceited person I have come across on this board. What, no quip about not demonstrating independent thought? That's your tired critique of people who don't share your reasoned line of thinking. Do me a favor, put me on ignore so you won't see what I have written and I won't have to read your smarmy responses. Go back to watching Sarah Palin's Alaska.
Just put *him* on ignore. It's mostly worked for me, except it's only a partial fix, as other posters keep quoting his posts, so I still end up reading some of them.
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Yelnoc
YaBB God
Posts: 6565
Re: MT-PPP: Palin 23% Huckabee 22% Gingrich 16% Romney 12% Paul 9%
«
Reply #24 on:
December 04, 2010, 02:07:27 pm »
Quote from: Poundingtherock on December 03, 2010, 06:44:07 pm
What 3 polls? He led in Marist and Rasmussen. rasmussen had his difficulties in the midterms and Marist polled around 330 people and somehow found Rick Perry polling higher than Tim Pawlenty. What's the third poll that shows Romney in the lead?
That Michigan poll that he led in is from several months ago. I'm pretty sure he's still in the lead and if he's not, well, he might as well concede right now.
Whacker isn't a very intelligent guy. However, even he sees what everyone sees and that is Romney is fading pretty much everywhere.
How have you not been banned yet?
Logged
Goodbye
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...