Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 30, 2014, 12:36:26 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections
| | |-+  2012 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Tender Branson)
| | | |-+  PPP: Sen. Stabenow (D-Mich) leads Hoekstra and Engler
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: PPP: Sen. Stabenow (D-Mich) leads Hoekstra and Engler  (Read 2282 times)
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 828
United States


View Profile
« on: December 08, 2010, 03:38:18 pm »
Ignore

Debbie Stabenow: 49
John Engler: 42

Debbie Stabenow: 45
Pete Hoekstra: 44

Debbie Stabenow: 45
Terri Lynn Land: 41

URL: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MI_1208806.pdf
Logged

Capitan Zapp Brannigan
Addicted to Politics
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1093


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2010, 04:55:44 pm »
Ignore

Compared to the Obama numbers those look pretty bad for her.
Logged
OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10036
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2010, 05:57:23 pm »
Ignore

If Obama loses PA and MI it will be a landslide for Mitt Romney who is gonna be the apparent nominee anyways, so he gets the nomination, this will be contested.
Logged
Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16856
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2010, 06:07:58 pm »
Ignore

Hoekstra has the highest numbers against her? Seriously? As far as Republicans go, you'd be hard pressed to find someone more ridiculous and full of themselves.

Nevertheless I'm sure Stabenow will be fine in 2012.
Logged

All In For KC
tmthforu94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18484
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2010, 06:19:25 pm »
Ignore

This can't be good news for Stabenow. I'm surprised Engler is so low. Personally, I'd like to see Lynn Land get the nomination, but I'm not sure if she'll run.
Logged


"A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives."
-Jackie Robinson
Kevin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4892
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2010, 07:24:23 pm »
Ignore

These are horrible numbers for an incumbent, especially in a Democratic-leaning state like Michigan. Also I read a PPP poll a while back if I recall correctly, and Stabennow's approvals were pretty bad.
Logged

Invisible Obama
DrScholl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3769
United States



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2010, 07:34:58 pm »
Ignore

I don't see what is so horrible about the numbers, they are better than they could be at this stage in the game when opposition is seen as very generic. Stabenow will have quite a boost from Presidential turnout, so that plays heavily in her favor.
Logged

Please seek a 5150 if your candidate loses.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52289


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2010, 09:45:39 pm »
Ignore

Weird how I was randomly talking about her re-election chances with someone just hours before I saw this. I said she could be knocked off and didn't have Levin-like popularity. Wink

For the record, the other person brought up her re-election chances. I don't randomly start talking that type of stuff.  Tongue
Logged

The soon-to-be-re-elected Kings of Kansas.
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 828
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2010, 07:56:20 am »
Ignore

Most interesting observations about this poll (in my opinion):

John Engler - Favorable: 33; Unfavorable: 45
-50% of independents/other view him unfavorably
-58% of moderates view him unfavorably
-73% of African-Americans view him unfavorably

Jennifer Granholm - Approve: 37; Disapprove: 57
-Her approvals are actually higher than I expected

Pete Hoekstra's favorability among self-identified liberals: 14
-This seems awful strange, as Hoekstra is often considered one of the more conservative members of the US House (certainly the most conservative US House member from Michigan)
Logged

Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39145
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2010, 10:30:11 am »
Ignore

Definitely a little surprising considering how well Obama is still running here.
Logged

Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12964


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2010, 10:51:50 am »
Ignore

I'm calling this fools' gold for Republicans unless 2012 is a repeat of 2010. Michigan's economy is still bad, so incumbents aren't going to look good... this is why the more established Republicans aren't doing better. The state's lean in a presidential year and the fact that Dem policy is much more favorable to Michigan than Republican is going to keep this in the D column, as with Washington and California this year. Even Feingold would have won in a 2012 electorate and Michigan isn't Wisconsin.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27427
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2010, 10:34:04 pm »
Ignore

I suspect the Dems are in  deep trouble in Michigan in 2012. The numbers this time in the state were that bad for the Dems. I didn't fully fathom it, until I vetted the state intensively, in the past month or so, as I was doing my redistricting plans. The Dems will need a big snap back, and it was not as if Detroit this time did not show up and vote. To me, the critical states in 2012 are Michigan and Wisconsin. I suspect Michigan will be more GOP than PA. I also think the economy will remain tepid in 2012, with still high unemployment. We have a long hard road folks.
Logged

Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12964


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2010, 07:01:54 pm »
Ignore

I suspect the Dems are in  deep trouble in Michigan in 2012. The numbers this time in the state were that bad for the Dems. I didn't fully fathom it, until I vetted the state intensively, in the past month or so, as I was doing my redistricting plans. The Dems will need a big snap back, and it was not as if Detroit this time did not show up and vote. To me, the critical states in 2012 are Michigan and Wisconsin. I suspect Michigan will be more GOP than PA. I also think the economy will remain tepid in 2012, with still high unemployment. We have a long hard road folks.

Did you see PPP's numbers in Michigan for Obama vs. the Republicans this past week? I would have shared your concern until I saw that. He's trouncing everyone except for Romney by double digits, and leading Romney substantially.

Here's the thread, you have to ignore the predictions to get to the real numbers.

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=129000.0
« Last Edit: December 10, 2010, 07:04:10 pm by brittain33 »Logged
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8608
Liechtenstein


Political Matrix
E: 4.52, S: -1.57

View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2010, 09:50:14 am »
Ignore

Not sure how a lead that's barely outside the margin of error is "substantial."
Logged
albaleman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2214
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.77, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2010, 10:27:36 am »
Ignore

These numbers are bad news for Stabenow, though I suspect she will squeak by due to Obama's coattails.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34695
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2010, 11:17:13 am »

Why exactly is Engler seen so unfavorable by MI voters ? I thought he was more a popular guy ?
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27427
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2010, 11:36:41 am »
Ignore

Why exactly is Engler seen so unfavorable by MI voters ? I thought he was more a popular guy ?

He left office quite unpopular. I am not sure why. Maybe voters just got tired of him. In watching him on the tube, I don't think he wore too well.
Logged

Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56862
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2010, 12:24:11 pm »
Ignore

Ask Eric.
Logged

"I have become entangled in my own data, and my conclusion stands in direct contradiction to the initial idea from which I started. Proceeding from unlimited freedom, I end with unlimited despotism. I will add, however, that there can be no solution of the social formula except mine."
cowboy300
Rookie
*
Posts: 22


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2010, 12:55:07 pm »
Ignore

Why is PPP doing 2012 polls now?  I would think 2011 would be in order in Mississippi and Kentucky.
Logged
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12964


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 11, 2010, 01:03:21 pm »
Ignore

Not sure how a lead that's barely outside the margin of error is "substantial."

True. I think I used that term because I was surprised at how well Obama is doing across the board in Michigan, but it doesn't make it a substantial lead in absolute terms.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27427
United States


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 11, 2010, 05:11:30 pm »
Ignore

I suspect the Dems are in  deep trouble in Michigan in 2012. The numbers this time in the state were that bad for the Dems. I didn't fully fathom it, until I vetted the state intensively, in the past month or so, as I was doing my redistricting plans. The Dems will need a big snap back, and it was not as if Detroit this time did not show up and vote. To me, the critical states in 2012 are Michigan and Wisconsin. I suspect Michigan will be more GOP than PA. I also think the economy will remain tepid in 2012, with still high unemployment. We have a long hard road folks.

Did you see PPP's numbers in Michigan for Obama vs. the Republicans this past week? I would have shared your concern until I saw that. He's trouncing everyone except for Romney by double digits, and leading Romney substantially.

Here's the thread, you have to ignore the predictions to get to the real numbers.

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=129000.0

I was unaware of this poll and yes, it is interesting. Yes, other than Romney, the field of GOP candidates polled suck for Michigan, and all are losers in any event to Obama. Of that, I am quite confident. As to the poll however, I have trouble believing that Obama has a favorable rating of 2-1 with moderates. Why would it be so much higher here, than the nation?
Logged

Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30616
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 11, 2010, 05:20:44 pm »
Ignore

Why is PPP doing 2012 polls now?  I would think 2011 would be in order in Mississippi and Kentucky.

They want to establish long-term trendlines.
Logged

this is real
opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47609


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 11, 2010, 05:31:29 pm »
Ignore

I know it sounds bizarre, and especially to hear it coming from me, but the economy is set for quite a rebound, and states like Michigan and the rust belt are set to come back strongest (albeit from a terrible base).  It depends on whether people are encouraged by the direction things are going, or the fact that they will still be objectively pretty bad in 2012 in MI/WI, etc.
Logged

The essence of democracy at its purest is a lynch mob

Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19801
United States


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 11, 2010, 05:34:28 pm »
Ignore

I suspect the Dems are in  deep trouble in Michigan in 2012. The numbers this time in the state were that bad for the Dems. I didn't fully fathom it, until I vetted the state intensively, in the past month or so, as I was doing my redistricting plans. The Dems will need a big snap back, and it was not as if Detroit this time did not show up and vote. To me, the critical states in 2012 are Michigan and Wisconsin. I suspect Michigan will be more GOP than PA. I also think the economy will remain tepid in 2012, with still high unemployment. We have a long hard road folks.

Did you see PPP's numbers in Michigan for Obama vs. the Republicans this past week? I would have shared your concern until I saw that. He's trouncing everyone except for Romney by double digits, and leading Romney substantially.

Here's the thread, you have to ignore the predictions to get to the real numbers.

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=129000.0

I was unaware of this poll and yes, it is interesting. Yes, other than Romney, the field of GOP candidates polled suck for Michigan, and all are losers in any event to Obama. Of that, I am quite confident. As to the poll however, I have trouble believing that Obama has a favorable rating of 2-1 with moderates. Why would it be so much higher here, than the nation?

David Weigel hypothesized that it's because the auto bailout is popular:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2010/12/07/breaking-michigan-supported-huge-bailout-of-michigan.aspx

though I haven't really been following the political situation in Michigan, so I'd be curious as to what others thought of that.
Logged

HOG & Blondie: A Tale of Atlas Future

What is your opinion of this thread?

Watch Dave being briefed by the mods.

Being a moderator is basically like one giant party.  Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9223
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -5.22

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 11, 2010, 05:35:23 pm »
Ignore

I know it sounds bizarre, and especially to hear it coming from me, but the economy is set for quite a rebound, and states like Michigan and the rust belt are set to come back strongest (albeit from a terrible base). 

Why do you believe that?
Logged

Bob Findley: "You're a real dyed-in-the-wool son-of-a-bitch. Anyone ever told you that?"
Steve Everett: "Just close friends and family,"

Clint Eastwood's "True Crime", 1999.
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines