Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2013, 03:09:59 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Questions and Answers
| |-+  The Atlas
| | |-+  Should Libertas-style "debating" be an infractable offense?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Should Libertas-style "debating" be an infractable offense?  (Read 1457 times)
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68061
Sweden


View Profile
« on: December 11, 2010, 11:52:53 pm »
Ignore

Of course the primary offender is gone, but it's not like it isn't used otherwise. It is basically trolling. (If you don't know I'm referring to basically just saying "you're wrong" to every point the other person makes or just using a dumb ad hominem attack.)
« Last Edit: December 12, 2010, 09:51:00 am by What I wouldn't give for a million smaller problems »Logged

A cowboy always follows his beard
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4302
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2010, 11:58:04 pm »
Ignore

No, because it's fascist.

But really,yes.
Logged

Quote from: Roger Klotz
The Monroe Doctrine is the coolest law ever!  It says "HEY! STAY OUT OF MY YARD AND DON'T TOUCH MY STUFF OR I'LL CREAM YA!

Socialism sounds good until you find out you have to share things. - Mechaman

If you get the reference in my title, you win.
crypto-fascist superhero
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7808
Liechtenstein


Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2010, 11:59:27 pm »
Ignore

I think BRTD-style threads should be an infractable offense.
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7267
Colombia


Political Matrix
E: 1.16, S: -4.00

View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2010, 12:12:11 am »
Ignore

should responding only with "lolz" also then be an infractabele offense?
Logged

"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. . . But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette

http://tinyurl.com/bx359q5
white trash heroes
Ghost_white
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2842


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 4.17

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2010, 12:15:40 am »
Ignore

I think BRTD-style threads should be an infractable offense.
Logged

Frozen out of focus, the sunday crowd started dreaming of television turned up too loud. And coded conversations, half baked and tired, Left us sleepy on blacktops burning the motor mile. And underneath the arcade, details collide. There's good shopping, but all those patrons have too much style...
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7717
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2010, 01:10:30 am »
Ignore

Uh, no it shouldn't.
Logged

Joe Republic
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28523
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2010, 01:57:30 am »
Ignore

I agree that it's becoming more and more common to see The LibertasTM emoticon employed as a first line of defense, along with abrupt contradictory rebuttals (e.g. "Uh, no it isn't. [end of post]").  But it'd be a worrying precedent to outlaw styles of debate that are considered useless.  Let their poor quality of debate skills speak for themselves.
Logged

Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14740
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2010, 02:02:19 am »
Ignore

I think BRTD-style threads should be an infractable offense.

I don't know what that means.  I just wanted to get in on the fun of misquoting.
Logged

What is your opinion of this thread?

Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.

Being a moderator is basically like one giant party.  Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22217
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2010, 01:31:41 pm »
Ignore

I think BRTD-style threads should be an infractable offense.

I don't know what that means.  I just wanted to get in on the fun ofmisquoting.

Logged

Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8112
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2010, 03:18:54 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech should not be an infractable offense.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7717
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2010, 03:51:15 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech should not be an infractable offense.

loltroll
Logged

I left.
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20473
Germany
View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2010, 04:57:54 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech should not be an infractable offense.

lol
Logged

I've lost interest in the forum and I've wasted far too much time here.

To those I consider forum friends, it's been nice and I hope to keep contact in some form.

Cheers.
President Mitt
Giovanni
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3669
Samoa


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2010, 05:14:03 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech should not be an infractable offense.

lol
Logged

[This space is available for purchase]
Proud Lieberal from Northeast
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35719


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2010, 05:20:07 pm »
Ignore

Um um um ug ug uh uh uh uh uh um um um uh uh uh uh ug ug ug ug

u hate freedom

ug ug uh uh um um

i do not troll

um um um
Logged

dialectical fetishist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12158
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2010, 09:28:06 am »
Ignore

Freedom of speech is a cute idea, but it doesn't work - you can't tolerate people who are intolerant.
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7267
Colombia


Political Matrix
E: 1.16, S: -4.00

View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2010, 03:24:58 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech is a cute idea, but it doesn't work - you can't tolerate people who are intolerant.
Logged

"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. . . But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette

http://tinyurl.com/bx359q5
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14249
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2010, 02:43:00 am »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...
Logged

Californian Tony
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24682
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2010, 04:45:24 am »
Ignore

Of course.
Logged



Truer today than it was yesterday.



"A good portion of this country has created an alternate universe. I call this place were these folks live Bullsh*t Mountain. The denizens of Bullsh*t Mountain believe many things: they believe that a Kenyan Muslim President has fundamentally changed the relationship between government and the people of this country."

Jon Stewart
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21521
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 16, 2010, 05:02:57 pm »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...

     There is no guarantee of it, but the owner of a given forum could decide to govern it according to that principle (which Dave has not, for reasons that are self-evident when one considers the intended role of the site).
Logged

Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8112
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2010, 05:50:17 pm »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...

There is no guarantee of it, but the owner of a given forum could decide to govern it according to that principle.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6700


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2010, 04:42:31 pm »
Ignore

You're wrong.
Logged
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22217
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 17, 2010, 04:49:38 pm »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...

     There is no guarantee of it, but the owner of a given forum could decide to govern it according to that principle (which Dave has not, for reasons that are self-evident when one considers the intended role of the site).

As a Professor of Atlasology at the University of Paris, Texas, I must concur with your interpretation.
Logged

Yelnoc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6565
United States
View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: December 17, 2010, 06:22:58 pm »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...

     There is no guarantee of it, but the owner of a given forum could decide to govern it according to that principle (which Dave has not, for reasons that are self-evident when one considers the intended role of the site).

As a Professor of Atlasology at the University of Paris, Texas, I must concur with your interpretation.
You Lie!
Logged

Goodbye
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory