Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 28, 2016, 03:46:25 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  About this Site
| |-+  The Atlas
| | |-+  Should Libertas-style "debating" be an infractable offense?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Should Libertas-style "debating" be an infractable offense?  (Read 2135 times)
L'exquisite Douleur
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 77522
France


View Profile
« on: December 11, 2010, 11:52:53 pm »
Ignore

Of course the primary offender is gone, but it's not like it isn't used otherwise. It is basically trolling. (If you don't know I'm referring to basically just saying "you're wrong" to every point the other person makes or just using a dumb ad hominem attack.)
« Last Edit: December 12, 2010, 09:51:00 am by What I wouldn't give for a million smaller problems »Logged

Squidward Scissorhands
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7336
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2010, 11:58:04 pm »
Ignore

No, because it's fascist.

But really,yes.
Logged

I know the culture of Hollywood leans liberal so I boycott most movies unless one of the actors has publicly come out as a pot-smoking libertarian.
tpfkaw
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9165
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2010, 11:59:27 pm »
Ignore

I think BRTD-style threads should be an infractable offense.
Logged
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15271
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2010, 12:12:11 am »
Ignore

should responding only with "lolz" also then be an infractabele offense?
Logged
oreomilkshake
Ghost_white
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3963


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: 0.87

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2010, 12:15:40 am »
Ignore

I think BRTD-style threads should be an infractable offense.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10976
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2010, 01:10:30 am »
Ignore

Uh, no it shouldn't.
Logged
Joe Republic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33480
Kiribati


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2010, 01:57:30 am »
Ignore

I agree that it's becoming more and more common to see The LibertasTM emoticon employed as a first line of defense, along with abrupt contradictory rebuttals (e.g. "Uh, no it isn't. [end of post]").  But it'd be a worrying precedent to outlaw styles of debate that are considered useless.  Let their poor quality of debate skills speak for themselves.
Logged

Mr. Morden
Modadmin
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29983
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2010, 02:02:19 am »
Ignore

I think BRTD-style threads should be an infractable offense.

I don't know what that means.  I just wanted to get in on the fun of misquoting.
Logged

My magnum opus is now complete.  Read the complete "The Adventures of Hobo Orgy Guy & Blondie" (now in paperback).

Watch Dave being briefed by the mods.

Being a moderator is basically like one giant party.  Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29560
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2010, 01:31:41 pm »
Ignore

I think BRTD-style threads should be an infractable offense.

I don't know what that means.  I just wanted to get in on the fun ofmisquoting.

Logged

Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8060
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2010, 03:18:54 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech should not be an infractable offense.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10976
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2010, 03:51:15 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech should not be an infractable offense.

loltroll
Logged
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22384
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2010, 04:57:54 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech should not be an infractable offense.

lol
Logged
President Mitt
Giovanni
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3506
Samoa


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2010, 05:14:03 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech should not be an infractable offense.

lol
Logged

[This space is available for purchase]
The People's Flag Is Deepest Red
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 43525


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2010, 05:20:07 pm »
Ignore

Um um um ug ug uh uh uh uh uh um um um uh uh uh uh ug ug ug ug

u hate freedom

ug ug uh uh um um

i do not troll

um um um
Logged

k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11892
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2010, 09:28:06 am »
Ignore

Freedom of speech is a cute idea, but it doesn't work - you can't tolerate people who are intolerant.
Logged
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15271
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2010, 03:24:58 pm »
Ignore

Freedom of speech is a cute idea, but it doesn't work - you can't tolerate people who are intolerant.
Logged
Bacon!
Bacon King
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17617
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2010, 02:43:00 am »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...
Logged

BK without all the crazy drugs just wouldn't be BK.
I did not see L.A.
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40002
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2010, 04:45:24 am »
Ignore

Of course.
Logged


"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."

-- Ted Kennedy
PiT, South Governor
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24305
United States


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 16, 2010, 05:02:57 pm »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...

     There is no guarantee of it, but the owner of a given forum could decide to govern it according to that principle (which Dave has not, for reasons that are self-evident when one considers the intended role of the site).
Logged

Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8060
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2010, 05:50:17 pm »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...

There is no guarantee of it, but the owner of a given forum could decide to govern it according to that principle.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6702


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: December 17, 2010, 04:42:31 pm »
Ignore

You're wrong.
Logged
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29560
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 17, 2010, 04:49:38 pm »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...

     There is no guarantee of it, but the owner of a given forum could decide to govern it according to that principle (which Dave has not, for reasons that are self-evident when one considers the intended role of the site).

As a Professor of Atlasology at the University of Paris, Texas, I must concur with your interpretation.
Logged

Yelnoc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7043
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: December 17, 2010, 06:22:58 pm »
Ignore

There is no freedom of speech on a privately owned message board...

     There is no guarantee of it, but the owner of a given forum could decide to govern it according to that principle (which Dave has not, for reasons that are self-evident when one considers the intended role of the site).

As a Professor of Atlasology at the University of Paris, Texas, I must concur with your interpretation.
You Lie!
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines