When will America have a third party president?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 07:52:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  When will America have a third party president?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Will and when will Americans elect a third-party president?
#1
2012-2032
 
#2
2032-2052
 
#3
2052-2072
 
#4
2072-2092
 
#5
After 2092
 
#6
Never, we are forever bound to the two-party system
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 46

Author Topic: When will America have a third party president?  (Read 6814 times)
AmericanPatriot83
Rookie
**
Posts: 21
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 14, 2010, 09:45:37 AM »

Sooner than people think. I believe by 2020 we will either that or the 2 parties we have now will have crashed and burned. I look forward to that.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,073
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 14, 2010, 03:40:27 PM »

The right answer is : nobody knows that, and only the future will give us an answer. It's certainly not as unlikely as some people tend to believe.

But if you look back to past Third Party bids, you might consider that they suffered more from bad luck and/or bad candidates than by structural disadvantages. Perot stupidly dropped out and lost 20 points because of that. Anderson suffered from Reagan's late surge. Wallace's segregationist stances prevented him to gain ground outside the South. In 1912, hadn't the GOP been in power for 16 years, it's possible to imagine Wilson performing less well and thus Roosevelt having stood a chance. Also, hadn't populists taken over the democratic party in 1896, it is also possible to imagine a scenario with a Populist party gaining ground in the country and finally acceeding to Presidency.

To put it clearly : it's not because something has been in a way for a very long time that it will always be in that way. Also look at this article from Nate Silver about the eventuality of a Third Party bid in 2012 and its probability to succeed.
Logged
leatherface
Rookie
**
Posts: 35
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 21, 2010, 04:28:13 PM »

That depends on several factors, one if there is a credible option for the launch of a third-party bid, at this period in time, there is no viable option or even a groundswell, that is, if you factor in the tea-party, which I believe is a rump of the Republicans, but then you had the Dixiecrats in 1948, Charlie Crist is someone to consider but he isn't all that credible when you consider he became an independent when it seemed likely that he was going to be handed his hat by Marco Rubio in the GOP Senate primary in Florida, not an earth shattering reason to be hold
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 24, 2010, 09:03:16 PM »

I can't say when, but I see both of the major parties splitting eventually which could lead to a developed four party system composed of a far-right, tea party style party, a center-right party in the mold of Nixon and Bush I, a centrist party who's platform would be remnant of the DLC, and a center-left party that would be more or less the same as the modern day Democratic party (unfortunately, the far-left will never have serious representation in this country). This could very well happen within our lifetime. To an extent its already happening to the Republicans.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2010, 07:14:05 PM »

If Bloomberg runs in 1996, I see him as more of a Ross Perot than someone that's going to lead a lasting political movement. He would get whatever his number is in the electoral vote, then someone would try ot be his successor to the Centrist or Moderate movement or whatever, and they would fail, and it would go down like the Reform Party.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2010, 01:16:49 AM »
« Edited: October 31, 2010, 01:19:52 AM by MagneticFree »

I believe Canada has an established 3rd and 4th party system going, but that's besides the point.  My point is, the US it way too polarized and strange.
Logged
Dgov
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,558
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 31, 2010, 01:32:55 AM »

I believe Canada has an established 3rd and 4th party system going, but that's besides the point.  My point is, the US it way too polarized and strange.


I think they did, but it kind of merged into a 2-party system as the two Conservative parties united and the Two Liberal parties are kind of united.

Unless you count the seat-less Greens or the Quebec independence block, which are basically like US 3rd parties.
Logged
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,973


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: December 17, 2010, 10:57:34 PM »

Not soon enough
Logged
Einzige Mk. II
Rookie
**
Posts: 150


Political Matrix
E: 5.32, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: December 24, 2010, 08:22:00 AM »

Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: December 25, 2010, 02:48:01 PM »

I believe Canada has an established 3rd and 4th party system going, but that's besides the point.  My point is, the US it way too polarized and strange.


I think they did, but it kind of merged into a 2-party system as the two Conservative parties united and the Two Liberal parties are kind of united.

Unless you count the seat-less Greens or the Quebec independence block, which are basically like US 3rd parties.

What "Two Liberal parties" are you referring to?
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: December 25, 2010, 03:17:16 PM »

I believe Canada has an established 3rd and 4th party system going, but that's besides the point.  My point is, the US it way too polarized and strange.

Besides that, the way you win an election is based on electoral votes, not on popular support, so that prevents any major third party uprisings, and the fact that they never take states (last time was 1968), leads to people not voting for them. If it was based merely on popular vote, then third parties would feel more encouraged.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: December 25, 2010, 03:24:45 PM »

People, Duverger's law is a thing.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: December 25, 2010, 05:55:21 PM »

I believe Canada has an established 3rd and 4th party system going, but that's besides the point.  My point is, the US it way too polarized and strange.


I think they did, but it kind of merged into a 2-party system as the two Conservative parties united and the Two Liberal parties are kind of united.

Unless you count the seat-less Greens or the Quebec independence block, which are basically like US 3rd parties.

What "Two Liberal parties" are you referring to?

I think Dgov is referring to the Liberal and NDP parties. The two conservative parties would be the Progressive Conservatives and Canadian Alliance which merged in the early 2000's.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: December 25, 2010, 06:09:12 PM »

The New Democratic Party is a social democratic party. The Liberal Party is a liberal party. The U.S. Democratic Party is a big tent that would include both, but someone like me would be very out of place in the NDP yet very fitting with the Liberals. We have to remember to look beyond the confines of or own system when discussing other nations' politics.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: December 26, 2010, 03:30:44 AM »

I believe Canada has an established 3rd and 4th party system going, but that's besides the point.  My point is, the US it way too polarized and strange.


I think they did, but it kind of merged into a 2-party system as the two Conservative parties united and the Two Liberal parties are kind of united.

Unless you count the seat-less Greens or the Quebec independence block, which are basically like US 3rd parties.

What "Two Liberal parties" are you referring to?

I think Dgov is referring to the Liberal and NDP parties. The two conservative parties would be the Progressive Conservatives and Canadian Alliance which merged in the early 2000's.

Obviously the PCs and the Alliance were both conservative (they had the word in their names, even), but the NDP is a socialist opposition party and the Liberal Party is a centrist government party. They're not remotely similar.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.239 seconds with 15 queries.