WMDs found in Iraq

[A18]

What would the election have looked like if large stockpiles of WMDs had been found in Iraq?

[George W. Bush]

Bush would have won Wisconson, But It Might have cost him New Mexico. Nothing really changed.

[Grad Students are the Worst]

Bush would have won Wisconson, But It Might have cost him New Mexico. Nothing really changed.

...Why would WMD's being in Iraq cost him New Mexico?

[Shira]

And what if the supreme court of Massachusetts had not ignited the same sex marriage artificial fire?

[cabville]

Bush would have won in a landslide. 

[MHS2002]

If WMDs were found it wouldn't effect Bush in a negative way; he'd have a great shot at taking any state within about 3-4 percent or so. A solid win, but short of landslide proportions IMHO.

[IDS Judicial Overlord John Dibble]

A positive impact, definitely not negative. We wouldn't have had any of that 'Bush lied' crap(though we'd still have anti-Bush crap). It would snag him more swing voters for sure. Maybe a 2-3% increase all around.

[khirkhib]

It wouldn't have affected the election.  Most of the people that voted for Bush thought that they had found WMDs in Iraq anyway.

[A18]

Which we had. I said large stockpiles.

[opebo]

It would have changed nothing - even if they did exsist WMD were a ridiculous reason for the war.

Now the gay marriage thing - that had some real influence.