US House Redistricting: Washington (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:15:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: Washington (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Washington  (Read 84405 times)
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« on: June 08, 2011, 12:11:50 AM »

We have had nearly every seat go for the Democrats within living memory.


As nearly even Washington seat has went to a Republican in living memory.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2011, 02:39:07 PM »

I think this is the appropriate thread for this map.

Looks like Dennis might be heading West!


http://blogs.dixcdn.com/capitalblog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Redistricting-Map-Ohio-in-color-1.pdf
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2011, 01:53:18 PM »

What are the odds that the Commission will fail to agree on a plan, and let the Washington Supreme Court do it?  Do the Washington gurus have any opinion on that?

Won't happen. The Republicans would much rather take whatever deal the Democrats offer them than risk a court drawn map that would endanger Reichert.

If the Democrats actually believe that, it will end up in the Courts. The Republicans aren't going to be that stupid. Already, three of the commissioner have chosen to cross the Cascades in the same way. Seems like we have an agreement on the first element of the final map. Given how much his district shifts East, Reichert would really have to be screwed not to have a better district.

The issue is the new seat. Democrats have been spouting the meme that the final map will be a trade of given Reichert a better seat for giving the Democrats the new seat. The reality is that the bulk of the growth has been in the four districts represented by Republicans. Drawing a fifth Republican seat is as easy of a task as drawing a sixth Democratic district. The natural compromise would be keeping the five Democrats, strengthening Reichert, and drawing a "fair fight" district.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2011, 04:16:57 PM »

The reality is that the bulk of the growth has been in the four districts represented by Republicans.

Eastern Washington is growing more slowly than western Washington. That's two of the districts.

The four Republican-held districts are overpopulated by about 398,000 people, while the five Democratic-held districts are overpopulated by about 274,000 people.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2011, 02:07:20 PM »

Posted:

http://www.redistricting.wa.gov/assets/maps/122811_drafts/C-GC_2.0_Big_Map_Statewide.pdf
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2011, 02:38:07 PM »

I hope someone investigates Tim Ceis thoroughly. He's a very shady character, and there is a pretty decent chance he was bribed to accept this map.


Conspiracy theory #1.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2011, 02:46:35 PM »

This is a furking disaster! I'm furious..... Splitting Seattle.... what is the second... it's disgusting, or for that matter the 8th. I need to go throttle something Tongue

At least the 3rd looks 'nice'.

Oh, and Tacoma is split a nice even three ways, lovely.

The 2nd appears to be a 'round up all the Democrats in 5 counties' district. Looks like it includes Bellingham?

Sometimes, those waterfront "communities of interest" just don't work out your way!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.