Why is your division of the Cincinnati UCC acceptable? The concept of UCC is so that you can't have districts stretching outward from major cities. One of yours almost reaches Michigan, and the other reaches West Virginia, yet the majority of the population in each is in the Cincinnati suburbs.
Here is a possible scoring system:
Quota: Population of total area divided by number of elected persons.
Entitlement: Population of sub-area divided by quota. (e.g. the quota for Franklin County is 1.715).
Normalized Population: Population of an area divided by the quota. Conventionally, this is displayed as mixed decimal fraction with three digits of accuracy (to 0.1% of a district population), but should be computed as a rational number.
Magnitude: Entitlement trunctated to whole number that is less than equal to entitlement. Sub-areas with an entitlement of less than a quota have a magnitude of zero.
Sub-areas should have a number of districts equal to the magnitude wholly within them, and no more than magnitude plus one districts wholly or partially within them.
(1) Penalty for failure to have magnitude districts wholly within a sub-area:
Magnitude minus normalized population of the magnitude most populated districts wholly or partially within a sub-area.
(2) Penalty for excessive division:
Normalized population of smallest districts in excess of magnitude plus one largest districts.
(3) Penalty for inequality:
Population that would have to be shifted to reach full equality.
Example:
Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati UCC's have magnitude 2, while Dayton UCC has magnitude of 1. All other UCCs have magnitude of zero.
Franklin, Cuyahoga, and Hamilton counties have magnitude 1, all others have a magnitude of zero.
Columbus (Franklin) has magnitude 1, all others have a magnitude of one.
Scoring of Torie and Jimrtex plans.
Cleveland UCC (magnitude 2):
Torie does not have two districts wholly in UCC, but includes all of UCC within 3 districts. Penalty the portion of the second largest district outside the UCC (population of Ashtabula 0.123).
Jimrtex does have two districts wholly in UCC, but is divided among four districts. Penalty for fourth district (population of Medina 0.231).
Columbus UCC (magnitude 2):
Torie and Jimrtex both have two districts wholly within the UCC, and one district containing the remainder. No penalties.
Cincinnati UCC (magnitude 2):
Torie has one district wholly within the UCC, and two districts partially within the UCC. Penalty for portion of district outside Warren-Ashtabula district 0.432.
Jimrtex has two districts wholly in UCC and a third extending outside the UCC (no penalty)
Dayton UCC (magnitude 1):
Both Torie and Jimrtex have one district wholly in UCC (no penalty).
All other UCCs (magnitude 0):
All are wholly contained in a single district (no penalty)
(Dis)respect for UCC:
Torie: 0.555
Jimrtex: 0.232
Large counties: Franklin, Cuyahoga, Hamilton (magnitude 1)
Torie and Jimrtext have one district wholly in counties, and the remainder in a second district. No penalty.
Large city: Columbus (Franklin) (magnitude 1):
Jimrtex has one district almost entirely in Columbus, with only a full small enclaves preventing this. A small penalty of perhaps 0.030. Torie apparently has a more substantial division of Columbus, likely around 0.100 to 0.200.
Division of small counties/inequality:
It really doesn't matter whether a specific area has been identified as in Torie's map for Geauga, which would be classified as a county split, or simply whether a shift would be necessary to achieve equality. Jimrtex has an inequality of 0.220, with 0.101 of that due to the split of Clermont. Another 0.055 is due to balancing the Dayton and Akron districts, which are present in Tories districts. There is no reason to suppose that the remaining is materially different than Torie's plan.
Total Penalties:
UCC: T 0.555, J 0.232
Counties: T 0.000, J 0.000
Cities: T 0.100-0.200, J 0.030
Inequality: T 0.119, J 0.220
Total: T 0.764, J 0.482