Predicting Johnson could be competative nationally is the kind of talk that only takes place on message boards. It's fantasy.
Huh, im sure that's what they said about Garfield. It happens.
Why don't we check the message boards of 1880 and find out?
Okay let's check
Are you bloody serious? James Garfield? I mean granted we are on a message board when the internet supposedly doesn't exist and therefore there is no Wikipedia but still somehow we all know who this James Garfield chap is. Anyway, where the hell do you get this insane notion that a nobody like Garfield can somehow make it to the National Convention Ballot? Especially when the likes of Sherman, Grant, and Blaine are all likely to be the top contenders? Men with infinitely more name recognition than this randomass Ohio Representative? I mean if anything he is probably just going to be a yes man for Sherman anyhow?
I mean why the hell would the Convention nominate a nobody like Garfield against someone with name recognition like Hancock, Hendricks, Bayard, or even Tilden. Considering that Tilden kicked the GOP's asses in the popular vote and only lost by one electoral vote imagine what kind of damage he would do if a nobody like Garfield is nominated?
Astronomical says I.[/quote]