Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 08, 2016, 01:09:06 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderator: muon2)
| | |-+  US House Redistricting: Alabama
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Alabama  (Read 9700 times)
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14750
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #50 on: May 21, 2012, 09:57:01 pm »
Ignore

Ah, as expected, the Alabama House has adopted McClendon's redistricting plan.

Now waiting on the Senate to produce theirs....  


Logged

BigSkyBob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2339
View Profile
« Reply #51 on: May 23, 2012, 11:50:32 am »
Ignore


Senate plan:

http://www.legislature.state.al.us/reapportionment/Dial_Senate_Plan_Map.pdf

House plan:

http://www.legislature.state.al.us/reapportionment/McClendon_House_Plan_Map.pdf
Logged

The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14750
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #52 on: May 23, 2012, 05:08:34 pm »
Ignore

The Senate has just approved its redistricting plan.  
Logged

Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14750
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #53 on: May 25, 2012, 08:27:40 pm »
Ignore

Does anyone think the Justice Department will approve these maps? 
Logged

Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18450
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: 3.13

View Profile
« Reply #54 on: May 25, 2012, 11:01:30 pm »
Ignore

Does anyone think the Justice Department will approve these maps? 

Based on the softball approach to redistricting that the DoJ has taken so far, probably so.
Logged


BigSkyBob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2339
View Profile
« Reply #55 on: May 26, 2012, 01:46:30 pm »
Ignore

Does anyone think the Justice Department will approve these maps? 

Based on the softball approach to redistricting that the DoJ has taken so far, probably so.

1) First of all, the DoJ has played hardball witness Texas. Since the other maps have complied with the VRA, there has been no basis for an objection.

2) Any serious attempt to play hardball is apt to be meet with a giant judicial bitchslap from the Supreme Court that would not only overrule the DOJ in that case, but might strike down the VRA itself. Notice how the DoJ slinked away in Kingston NC, I think it was.
Logged

The real scandal in Washington is not the bribery, corruption, or sex. It is how poorly we are governed.
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18450
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: 3.13

View Profile
« Reply #56 on: May 26, 2012, 01:48:46 pm »
Ignore

Does anyone think the Justice Department will approve these maps? 

Based on the softball approach to redistricting that the DoJ has taken so far, probably so.

1) First of all, the DoJ has played hardball witness Texas. Since the other maps have complied with the VRA, there has been no basis for an objection.

2) Any serious attempt to play hardball is apt to be meet with a giant judicial bitchslap from the Supreme Court that would not only overrule the DOJ in that case, but might strike down the VRA itself. Notice how the DoJ slinked away in Kingston NC, I think it was.

They could have drawn additional VRA seats in SC, LA and possibly AL.
Logged


muon2
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10803


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: May 26, 2012, 10:45:11 pm »

Does anyone think the Justice Department will approve these maps? 

Based on the softball approach to redistricting that the DoJ has taken so far, probably so.

1) First of all, the DoJ has played hardball witness Texas. Since the other maps have complied with the VRA, there has been no basis for an objection.

2) Any serious attempt to play hardball is apt to be meet with a giant judicial bitchslap from the Supreme Court that would not only overrule the DOJ in that case, but might strike down the VRA itself. Notice how the DoJ slinked away in Kingston NC, I think it was.

They could have drawn additional VRA seats in SC, LA and possibly AL.

TX chose to go to the DC circuit while the others went through DOJ first. It sure looks like DOJ thought retaining its position as the first choice for states was more important than seeing minorities get a chance to be represented proportionally to their numbers.
Logged



2016 PVI map of the Electoral College, with each state's size proportional to its vote in the EC. Grey states are even (PVI 0 or 1), pale states are lean-likely (PVI 2 through 5), dark states are solid (PVI 6 or more).
minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58762
India


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: June 03, 2012, 11:30:26 am »
Ignore

Does anyone think the Justice Department will approve these maps? 

Based on the softball approach to redistricting that the DoJ has taken so far, probably so.

1) First of all, the DoJ has played hardball witness Texas. Since the other maps have complied with the VRA, there has been no basis for an objection.

2) Any serious attempt to play hardball is apt to be meet with a giant judicial bitchslap from the Supreme Court that would not only overrule the DOJ in that case, but might strike down the VRA itself. Notice how the DoJ slinked away in Kingston NC, I think it was.

They could have drawn additional VRA seats in SC, LA and possibly AL.

TX chose to go to the DC circuit while the others went through DOJ first. It sure looks like DOJ thought retaining its position as the first choice for states was more important than seeing minorities get a chance to be represented proportionally to their numbers.
And the fear of Section Whatever (I have no memory for names of things like that) being struck played a large role in that.

But Texas went that route because a) they're morons b) soft enough a ball to okay their first map attempt hasn't been invented yet.
Logged

If I'm shown as having been active here recently it's either because I've been using the gallery, because I've been using the search engine looking up something from way back, or because I've been reading the most excellent UK by-elections thread again.
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines