US House Redistricting: South Carolina (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:00:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: South Carolina (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: South Carolina  (Read 19540 times)
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« on: May 30, 2011, 04:56:18 PM »

The VRA is about minority voters electing a candidate of their choice, not tailoring districts that will guarantee the election of a minority. SC-1 doesn't qualify under that criteria, even if it is represented by an African-American, but that logic it would had to have been converted to a minority-majority district just because of who was elected to represent it.

The VRA act was about stopping the "cracking" of minorities so that no minority was elected.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2011, 01:33:25 PM »








Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

1) I see the VRA is now being reintrepreted to protect White liberals. In case you have forgotten, White liberals have never been subjected to the types of acts that the VRA was suppose to remedy.

2)  This presumes a closed primary system in which White voters whom typical vote Republican don't nominate the White Democrat in the primary.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2011, 11:11:16 PM »

Congressional redistricting debate splinters Senate

(link - The State)

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

As mentioned later in the article, the GOP will do its best to find a plan to agree to so as to avoid having a three-judge Federal panel draw the lines and possibly giving the Democrats the chance to elect a second Representative.

The Senate will resume debate on redistricting on Monday.

I wonder if part of the public fight stems from a private recognition that any 6-1 plan will be vulnerable to a challenge. Black statewide VAP is 26.3%, which is equivalent to 1.84 congressional districts. The standard is "rough proportionality", but there's no clear guidance as to whether 1 district is roughly proportional to 1.84. Perhaps the lawyers internally are suggesting that it would be unlikely to be viewed that way.


Substitute "Hispanic" for "Black," and "California" for "South Carolina" and you have about 20 "Hispanic" VRA districts. Good Luck drawing that many seats. The reality is that Hispanics are fairly dispersed in California, and Blacks are fairly dispersed in the South, including South Carolina.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.