Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2013, 07:09:14 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: Former Moderate, Badger)
| | |-+  Same-Sex Marriage Bill Falls Short in Maryland
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Print
Author Topic: Same-Sex Marriage Bill Falls Short in Maryland  (Read 5214 times)
Sheliak5
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 852


Political Matrix
E: 0.51, S: -9.21

View Profile
« Reply #100 on: March 06, 2011, 09:38:24 am »
Ignore

Also, blacks in the DC suburbs are more socially liberal than blacks in California. There was a poll a few years ago that indicated that indicated a plurality of blacks in DC would vote for marriage equality.

Plurality, eh?

Compared to blacks in most states, this is saying a lot.

If it's for or against, a plurality is a minority, no?

I'm guessing he meant a plurality supported gay marriage given the options gay marriage, civil union or neither.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16900


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

View Profile
« Reply #101 on: March 06, 2011, 09:56:11 am »
Ignore

Also, blacks in the DC suburbs are more socially liberal than blacks in California. There was a poll a few years ago that indicated that indicated a plurality of blacks in DC would vote for marriage equality.

Plurality, eh?

Compared to blacks in most states, this is saying a lot.

If it's for or against, a plurality is a minority, no?

I'm guessing he meant a plurality supported gay marriage given the options gay marriage, civil union or neither.

Or there were some undecideds (e.g., 49 in favor, 46 opposed).
Logged
Sheliak5
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 852


Political Matrix
E: 0.51, S: -9.21

View Profile
« Reply #102 on: March 11, 2011, 03:18:19 pm »
Ignore

The bill was sent back to committee as there were apparently not enough votes. Hopefully throughout the year some of these delegates will stop being bullied around by the churches and do the right thing.
Logged
Smash255
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13917


View Profile
« Reply #103 on: March 11, 2011, 03:37:47 pm »
Ignore

The bill was sent back to committee as there were apparently not enough votes. Hopefully throughout the year some of these delegates will stop being bullied around by the churches and do the right thing.

Disgusting
Logged

Sheliak5
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 852


Political Matrix
E: 0.51, S: -9.21

View Profile
« Reply #104 on: March 11, 2011, 03:49:09 pm »
Ignore

The bill was sent back to committee as there were apparently not enough votes. Hopefully throughout the year some of these delegates will stop being bullied around by the churches and do the right thing.

Disgusting

It is, very much so. Especially because some of the delegates i.e. Tiffany Alston CLEARLY support gay marriage, but are scared to vote that way because they fear their "constituents" aka the church would primary them out.

I expected a lot more of my home state. I thought we were better than this. I still plan on moving back when I'm done with school, though.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2011, 03:53:54 pm by Sheliak5 »Logged
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12631
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #105 on: March 11, 2011, 06:14:18 pm »
Ignore

It says a lot when even states as liberal and Democratic as California, New York, and Maryland have hangups about legalizing gay marriage.  I confess I was a little surprised to see that this bill (before it was ultimately withdrawn) was having even more trouble in the Maryland House of Delegates than in the supposedly more conservative Senate.  
« Last Edit: March 11, 2011, 07:00:50 pm by Frodo »Logged

Smash255
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13917


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: March 11, 2011, 07:48:40 pm »
Ignore

It says a lot when even states as liberal and Democratic as California, New York, and Maryland have hangups about legalizing gay marriage.  I confess I was a little surprised to see that this bill (before it was ultimately withdrawn) was having even more trouble in the Maryland House of Delegates than in the supposedly more conservative Senate.  


The Democrats lost 6 seats in the House of Delegates last year, and I think they actually gained a seat in the State Senate, so those changes may have resulted in the House of Delegates not being the more liberal body anymore.  Regardless, way too many Democrats against this. 
Logged

krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5153


View Profile
« Reply #107 on: March 11, 2011, 10:03:45 pm »
Ignore

Why is anyone surprised? Minorities are generally not socially liberal, especially when it comes to the gays.
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6539
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #108 on: March 11, 2011, 10:12:25 pm »
Ignore

Why is anyone surprised? Minorities are generally not socially liberal, especially when it comes to the gays.

Logged

© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34286
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #109 on: March 11, 2011, 10:20:05 pm »
Ignore

relocate the political sphere away away from the economic sphere
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30757
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #110 on: March 11, 2011, 10:22:19 pm »
Ignore

About a third of the Democrats opposed it.  Ouch.
Logged

this is real
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68121
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: March 11, 2011, 11:07:06 pm »
Ignore

Where any white Democrats from Obama districts? They have absolutely no excuse.
Logged

Alaska Thunderfvck
MATCHU[D]
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6406
United States


View Profile
« Reply #112 on: March 11, 2011, 11:33:53 pm »
Ignore

Surprising and very disappointing.
Logged

ALLONS-Y!
Is JCL in mushy sappy love
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2835
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.22

View Profile
« Reply #113 on: March 12, 2011, 11:06:07 am »
Ignore

The bill was sent back to committee as there were apparently not enough votes. Hopefully throughout the year some of these delegates will stop being bullied around by the churches and do the right thing.

Disgusting

Not disgusting. The right thing to do is keep it banned until we can remove government from marriage.
Logged

Senate Race 2012:
IN-Richard Mourdock
TX- Ted Cruz (R)

Governor Races
IN- Mike Pence (R)

Congressional Races
Jackie Walorski (R/IN-2)
Marlin Stutzman (R/IN-3)
Todd Rokita (R/IN-4)
Chard Reid (Lib/IN-5)
Luke Messer (R/IN-6)
Carlos May (R/IN-7)
Larry Bucshon (R/IN-8)
Todd Young (R/IN-9)
Tom Massie (R/KY-4)
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6862


View Profile
« Reply #114 on: March 12, 2011, 11:20:27 am »
Ignore

Where any white Democrats from Obama districts? They have absolutely no excuse.

I haven't seen a list of which Democrats opposed it. From what I've heard, it's mostly the rural Democrats and the black Democrats from PG County.

It doesn't really matter, ultimately, since the law would go on hold until 2012 if the anti-marriage equality forces got enough signatures for a referendum. Assuming they can actually pass it next year.
Logged
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6539
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #115 on: March 12, 2011, 11:26:42 am »
Ignore

In an election year? No. But they'll have no qualms taking gay money, though.
Logged

JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6862


View Profile
« Reply #116 on: March 12, 2011, 11:45:41 am »
Ignore

The legislature isn't up until 2014.
Logged
Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27471
Belize


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: -6.09

View Profile
« Reply #117 on: March 13, 2011, 10:59:47 am »
Ignore

In an election year? No. But they'll have no qualms taking gay money, though.

Which hopefully will dry up...
Logged

I believe in you, BushKenya.

I've already tried faking it. It doesn't work.  The app is too smart for that.  I can't drive 3 mph, plus I would clog traffic.

girls just taste  better Cheesy
Sheliak5
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 852


Political Matrix
E: 0.51, S: -9.21

View Profile
« Reply #118 on: March 13, 2011, 01:55:04 pm »
Ignore

Where any white Democrats from Obama districts? They have absolutely no excuse.

I haven't seen a list of which Democrats opposed it. From what I've heard, it's mostly the rural Democrats and the black Democrats from PG County.

It doesn't really matter, ultimately, since the law would go on hold until 2012 if the anti-marriage equality forces got enough signatures for a referendum. Assuming they can actually pass it next year.

Yep. Virtually all of the black democrats from Baltimore supported it, PG county virtually none did. I'm still VERY surprised at that and still not sure why. The white Dems who voted against it were those from the eastern shore, rural areas as said.

IIRC there were ironicaly one or two Republicans that supported. From Howard county I'd guess, maybe Montgomery county if they have any Republicans left there (which I doubt).
Logged
Dgov
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1578
United States


View Profile
« Reply #119 on: March 13, 2011, 02:13:56 pm »
Ignore

Yep. Virtually all of the black democrats from Baltimore supported it, PG county virtually none did. I'm still VERY surprised at that and still not sure why. The white Dems who voted against it were those from the eastern shore, rural areas as said.

Maybe PG County is functioning like White Southern Suburbs?  I.E. Heavily Socially Conservative and willing to vote it, while the Baltimore ones only really care about economic issues and so just voted yes because its a party issue?

Thats the only explanation that i can think of.  But It'll almost certainly get passed in 2012 once the decennial removing of Republican districts commences.
Logged

Political Matrix:  +7.1, -3.83

A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
Smash255
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13917


View Profile
« Reply #120 on: March 13, 2011, 02:20:05 pm »
Ignore

Yep. Virtually all of the black democrats from Baltimore supported it, PG county virtually none did. I'm still VERY surprised at that and still not sure why. The white Dems who voted against it were those from the eastern shore, rural areas as said.

Maybe PG County is functioning like White Southern Suburbs?  I.E. Heavily Socially Conservative and willing to vote it, while the Baltimore ones only really care about economic issues and so just voted yes because its a party issue?

Thats the only explanation that i can think of.  But It'll almost certainly get passed in 2012 once the decennial removing of Republican districts commences.

PG County you would tend to think is quites socially liberal.  Generally much higher education levels in PG County than Baltimore, higher incomes, etc.  Support for gay marriage often goes hand and hand with education levels.  This is just odd.
Logged

Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11980


View Profile
« Reply #121 on: March 13, 2011, 03:31:59 pm »
Ignore

1. Legislators expect this to go to a referendum in 2012 and get repealed, which is why some probably saw no point in going through with it.

2. PG is where the leader opposed to marriage equality in DC was based.
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13397
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17

View Profile
« Reply #122 on: March 13, 2011, 04:14:48 pm »
Ignore

Presumably the black religious structure came out against gay marriage in PG County, while it did not in Baltimore...?
Logged

Dgov
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1578
United States


View Profile
« Reply #123 on: March 13, 2011, 04:18:00 pm »
Ignore

Yep. Virtually all of the black democrats from Baltimore supported it, PG county virtually none did. I'm still VERY surprised at that and still not sure why. The white Dems who voted against it were those from the eastern shore, rural areas as said.

Maybe PG County is functioning like White Southern Suburbs?  I.E. Heavily Socially Conservative and willing to vote it, while the Baltimore ones only really care about economic issues and so just voted yes because its a party issue?

Thats the only explanation that i can think of.  But It'll almost certainly get passed in 2012 once the decennial removing of Republican districts commences.

PG County you would tend to think is quites socially liberal.  Generally much higher education levels in PG County than Baltimore, higher incomes, etc.  Support for gay marriage often goes hand and hand with education levels.  This is just odd.

No, that's what I was saying--In the South Higher Education levels and Higher incomes really have no effect whatsoever on Social views (with some exceptions).  Rich Suburbanites in Forysth County are just as Socially Conservative as Poor Whites in North Georgia, and there might be a similar effect.
Logged

Political Matrix:  +7.1, -3.83

A world without sin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NVs68X_S4
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6862


View Profile
« Reply #124 on: March 13, 2011, 06:49:20 pm »
Ignore

Thats the only explanation that i can think of.  But It'll almost certainly get passed in 2012 once the decennial removing of Republican districts commences.

Maryland's state legislative districts are actually pretty fair, from a pure numbers perspective. O'Malley won 27 Senate districts (57.4%) and 80 (counting by number of members) House of Delegates districts (56.7%). That's almost exactly what his statewide percentage was, and that's with a bunch of 80-90% Democratic districts in Baltimore and PG County. (Edited to correct the Senate numbers.)

The legislature's numbers is so lopsided because there are 8 Democratic Senators and 18 Democratic Delegates in districts that Ehrlich won, and zero Republicans in O'Malley districts. (Edit: I take that back, there's one Republican Delegate in an O'Malley district, 3A. And undercounted the Dem Senators by 1.)

Also, the legislature isn't up again until 2014, as I said about ten posts ago.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2011, 07:07:31 pm by JohnnyLongtorso »Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory