Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 30, 2015, 02:59:05 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
| | |-+  Independents voting in primaries.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Should Independents be able to vote in primaries?
Yes   -9 (42.9%)
No   -12 (57.1%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 21

Author Topic: Independents voting in primaries.  (Read 1749 times)
kmorse11
Newbie
*
Posts: 4


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: 0.17

View Profile
« on: January 27, 2011, 08:25:14 pm »
Ignore

I know in some states they already can. But here in CT, we have closed primaries. Which is strange considering around 40% of voters are not registered with a party.
Logged
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22410
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2011, 02:21:03 pm »
Ignore

Theoretically speaking, I'd be against allowing non-members of a party a vote in choosing that party's leadership or candidate for an election.

But the United States doesn't have real political parties like other countries do.....so one might view the primary system as something similar to the first "round" of an election.

Still, my answer is no. You can "register" with the party if you want to vote in its primaries.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9100
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2011, 02:15:17 am »
Ignore

In practice, I think that open primaries are beneficial if they are considered a boon for my candidate. I am hypocritical there, however.

In terms of my position, though, I am generally against open primaries with independents choosing the way that a party nominates its candidates, as they are not formal members of the party.
Logged

Delicious Steak Pentagram
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30462
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2011, 02:15:20 pm »
Ignore

Theoretically speaking, I'd be against allowing non-members of a party a vote in choosing that party's leadership or candidate for an election.

But the United States doesn't have real political parties like other countries do.....so one might view the primary system as something similar to the first "round" of an election.

Still, my answer is no. You can "register" with the party if you want to vote in its primaries.

In South Carolina you "register" by voting in the primary.  If the parties want truly closed primaries, then they, not the government, should be the one to pay for the expense of running the primary.
Logged

Quote from: Ignatius of Antioch
He that possesses the word of Jesus, is truly able to bear his very silence. Epistle to the Ephesians 3:21a
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22410
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2011, 07:44:13 pm »
Ignore

Theoretically speaking, I'd be against allowing non-members of a party a vote in choosing that party's leadership or candidate for an election.

But the United States doesn't have real political parties like other countries do.....so one might view the primary system as something similar to the first "round" of an election.

Still, my answer is no. You can "register" with the party if you want to vote in its primaries.

In South Carolina you "register" by voting in the primary.  If the parties want truly closed primaries, then they, not the government, should be the one to pay for the expense of running the primary.

Absolutely, I agree with that.

Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines