Minor question on British 1997 election
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 12:06:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Minor question on British 1997 election
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Minor question on British 1997 election  (Read 960 times)
Insula Dei
belgiansocialist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 29, 2011, 04:58:04 PM »

Why was speaker Betty Boothroyd opposed by Richard Silvester (Ind. Labour) in West Bromwich West when she herself hailed from the Parliamentary Labour Party?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2011, 05:25:27 PM »

Something I found

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Also, elsewhere he's listed as "Labour Time for Change". I do wonder why he did so well, though.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2011, 05:29:00 PM »

Oh, and apparently he was later elected a LD councillor in Bolton, then defected to Labour, then lost to another LD in 2010. In Andrew Teale's home ward no less.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,674
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2011, 05:52:32 PM »


Because he had 'Labour' next to his name on the ballot and Boothroyd didn't.
Logged
doktorb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,072
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2011, 08:54:15 AM »

As convention says Speakers are not opposed by mainstream parties, handfulls of randoms and allsorts are found on the ballot.  This was also pre-Register of Political Parties, so names like "Independent Labour" were allowed.
Logged
joevsimp
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 482


Political Matrix
E: -5.95, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2011, 01:50:29 PM »



Because he had 'Labour' next to his name on the ballot and Boothroyd didn't.

See also Glasgow North East in 2005, Socialist Labour Party (Scargill's bunch) got 14% against Micheal Martin

and yeah, back then you could call yourself a Conservatory or a Literal Democrat
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2011, 02:00:56 PM »



Because he had 'Labour' next to his name on the ballot and Boothroyd didn't.

See also Glasgow North East in 2005, Socialist Labour Party (Scargill's bunch) got 14% against Micheal Martin

Did the SocLab candidate even break 20 votes at the by-election in 2009?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,674
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2011, 02:43:30 PM »



Because he had 'Labour' next to his name on the ballot and Boothroyd didn't.

See also Glasgow North East in 2005, Socialist Labour Party (Scargill's bunch) got 14% against Micheal Martin

Did the SocLab candidate even break 20 votes at the by-election in 2009?

Yes; they polled a massive 47 votes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.