CA/PPP: Feinstein safe
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 03:52:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  CA/PPP: Feinstein safe		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA/PPP: Feinstein safe  (Read 1454 times)
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 02, 2011, 05:05:39 PM »
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_CA_0202513.pdf

Dianne Feinstein (D) - 51
Tom Campbell (R) - 37

Dianne Feinstein (D) - 55
Carly Fiorina (R) - 35

Dianne Feinstein (D) - 54
Darrell Issa (R) - 33

Dianne Feinstein (D) - 52
Steve Poizner (R) - 34

Dianne Feinstein (D) - 59
Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) - 25

Dianne Feinstein (D) - 55
Meg Whitman (R) - 35

Feinstein's approals are 50/39. Carly Fiorina's favorables are 29/48, while Meg Whitman's are 28/50. And Arnold? 25/65.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2011, 11:53:16 AM »
LOL at Arnie
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2011, 11:56:09 AM »
Yep, nothing to see here, RNSC, unfortunately. Invest in better races.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,021
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2011, 11:58:27 AM »
Quote from: JohnnyLongtorso on February 02, 2011, 05:05:39 PM
Dianne Feinstein (D) - 54
Darrell Issa (R) - 33


LOL
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2011, 12:34:23 PM »

Can I ask you kindly if you're goddamn well blind? I've said THREE TIMES NOW that I don't pay attention to California. So kindly shut the bloody blazing hell up. 'kay? Thanks and come again, you annoying scrub.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2011, 12:42:14 PM »
Quote from: SvenssonRS on February 03, 2011, 12:34:23 PM

Can I ask you kindly if you're goddamn well blind? I've said THREE TIMES NOW that I don't pay attention to California. So kindly shut the bloody blazing hell up. 'kay? Thanks and come again, you annoying scrub.
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2011, 12:46:18 PM »
Quote from: Χahar on February 03, 2011, 12:42:14 PM
Quote from: SvenssonRS on February 03, 2011, 12:34:23 PM

Can I ask you kindly if you're goddamn well blind? I've said THREE TIMES NOW that I don't pay attention to California. So kindly shut the bloody blazing hell up. 'kay? Thanks and come again, you annoying scrub.



More just plain tired. I'm sick of him. I admit it.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,136
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2011, 01:01:00 PM »
Quote from: Insert self-righteous table-breaking screenname here on February 03, 2011, 12:34:23 PM

Can I ask you kindly if you're goddamn well blind? I've said THREE TIMES NOW that I don't pay attention to California. So kindly shut the bloody blazing hell up. 'kay? Thanks and come again, you annoying scrub.

Then isn't it wise not to post about a state you really know nothing about? Seems pretty logical. You have no one to yell at but yourself.
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2011, 01:03:47 PM »
Quote from: Estes Kefauver on February 03, 2011, 01:01:00 PM
Quote from: Insert self-righteous table-breaking screenname here on February 03, 2011, 12:34:23 PM

Can I ask you kindly if you're goddamn well blind? I've said THREE TIMES NOW that I don't pay attention to California. So kindly shut the bloody blazing hell up. 'kay? Thanks and come again, you annoying scrub.

Then isn't it wise not to post about a state you really know nothing about? Seems pretty logical. You have no one to yell at but yourself.

I just posted as a maybe suggestion from someone who wasn't very experienced with California politics. Sure, it was probably better to stay out, but I was just trying to discuss. Instead, I got blindsighted by both px75 and the idiot above me, which I can't say was particularly merited.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2011, 02:27:13 PM »
If you don't like someone, use the ignore button instead of whining about them.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 03, 2011, 02:36:59 PM »
Feinstein (and almost any other Democratic candidate besides maybe Angelides) will have absolutely no trouble next year with Obama on top of the ticket.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2011, 11:19:57 AM »
Quote from: GPORTER on February 06, 2011, 10:02:50 AM
Maybe as republicans we can hope for a miracle if Campbell is nominated...
Agreed. I'm not saying he'd win, but it isn't impossible to make up 14 points. McMahon made up a lot of ground last year in Connecticut, and turned a race that was once considered to be safe for Democrats into a tossup until a week or so before the election when it pulled back to Blumenthal.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,136
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 06, 2011, 12:52:06 PM »
« Edited: February 06, 2011, 12:53:37 PM by Estes Kefauver »
Campbell ran in 2000 and got crushed, so it's not like he has a record of even getting close to winning. Republicans couldn't win in California in 2010, so there is no reason to even think that they'll do better in 2012.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 06, 2011, 04:13:56 PM »
Quote from: Tmthforu94 on February 06, 2011, 11:19:57 AM
Quote from: GPORTER on February 06, 2011, 10:02:50 AM
Maybe as republicans we can hope for a miracle if Campbell is nominated...
Agreed. I'm not saying he'd win, but it isn't impossible to make up 14 points. McMahon made up a lot of ground last year in Connecticut, and turned a race that was once considered to be safe for Democrats into a tossup until a week or so before the election when it pulled back to Blumenthal.

Not really: https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2010/polls.php?fips=9&class=3

She never led or was tied in a single poll against Blumenthal, and the closest she got was a three point deficit in September.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 16 queries.