The Economist ranks the Republican field.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:23:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Economist ranks the Republican field.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: The Economist ranks the Republican field.  (Read 2190 times)
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2011, 11:11:02 PM »

Paul seems like a Barry Goldwater creature to me.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2011, 11:21:24 PM »

If Herman Cain had the experience as a Governor or Senator, I think he could make a serious run for the Republican nomination. But his lack of experience in public office would certainly hinder him. As a primary voter, that lack of experience is why I won't support him in the primary (though I would in the general).

Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,074
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 03, 2011, 11:28:25 PM »

Fair comment by The Economist. What a fine mag it is. I used to read it rather religiously.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2011, 01:23:13 AM »


See Taft's comment. Look at Dr. Paul's record. He has never voted for a tax increase. He has opposed the unjust war in Iraq and our foreign shenanigans. He advocates a sound monetary policy. I believe Pence has similar views regarding finances. He's a friend to gunowners and their concerns.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,684
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2011, 10:41:52 AM »

How is Bachmann considered a better chance than Christie or Barbour? And what's "Palin-lite"?  - she's less moderate than Palin for sure.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2011, 10:43:37 AM »

She'd be a better choice than Barbour...

I believe the "Palin-lite" is a reference to notoriety, not moderation or the lack of it.
Logged
Mr. Taft Republican
Taft4Prez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2011, 12:18:32 PM »

Paul seems like a Barry Goldwater creature to me.

Except kinda the exact opposite, at least in foreign policy. I mean, I think he's definitely likely to secure more states than Goldwater if he did win the nomination, and with the full force of the Republican machine behind him, who knows?
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2011, 12:49:19 PM »


See Taft's comment. Look at Dr. Paul's record. He has never voted for a tax increase. He has opposed the unjust war in Iraq and our foreign shenanigans. He advocates a sound monetary policy. I believe Pence has similar views regarding finances. He's a friend to gunowners and their concerns.

So you prefer Iraq invasion opponent Obama over the Iraq invasion supporter GOP nominee tbd?

I take Paul's chances a bit more seriously than I used to.  A growing number of conservatives (if still a minority) may be fatigued enough with Afghanistan to tolerate Paul's foreign policy and his budget cuts are surely deeper than almost every other GOP candidate.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 04, 2011, 02:11:49 PM »

I love how they listed Mormonism as a con. Very open-minded.

Very realistic.  While ideally it wouldn't be a factor in what the voters think of them, any Mormon candidate is going to suffer because of their creed, especially in a primary race where other distinctions between the candidates will be smaller.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.