FDR's Second Bill of Rights
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 01:45:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  FDR's Second Bill of Rights
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FDR's Second Bill of Rights  (Read 1340 times)
wilji1090
Rookie
**
Posts: 46
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 07, 2011, 04:03:18 PM »

If you watched Capitalism: A Love Story, Michael Moore presented a little known document that 32nd President Franklin Delano Roosevelt had written up called the Second Bill of Rights. It was more or less something which would have expanded upon what the Constitution protected against not only insuring Civil Liberty, but also Economic Liberty [in theory anyway]

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

My question here is would this entire bill of rights be rejected as "communistic" or "socialist" by the Republican/Dixiecrat alliance, would only parts of it be ratified and if so which ones, or unlikely would the entire bill have passed?

Personally, I think these amendments would be the only ones to pass and I shall explain why I think so:

* Right to Adequate Protection - that's the Social Security system; he's arguing that Americans have accepted Social Security as a permanent part of American government.

* Right to Farm - that's the AAA farm subsidy program; again, he's arguing that this is something that everyone has accepted as permanent.

* Right of Free Trade - as people have pointed out, this is just saying we should actually enforce anti-trust policies.

* Right to a Living Wage - well, this would have been just the expansion and increase of the minimum wage established in 1938.

Thoughts anyone?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2011, 05:48:39 PM »

The Second Bill of Rights is a fairly concise set of what are called "positive rights" they differ from the "negative rights" codified in the actual Bill of Rights, in that positive rights are framed in a way that requires government action to secure them, while negative rights require governments to refrain from certain actions to secure them.  Negative rights thus are perfectable but positive rights can only be imperfectly achieved because no government ever has infinite resources, and thus no government can ever be able to such goals such as education, employment, health care, etc., to the degree that it would be impossible to improve them further.  Hence, positive rights can never be absolute rights.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2011, 08:22:38 PM »

I wouldn't exactly call it "economic liberty"...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.