SouthEast UK (EXC. LONDON) Tories control 92/102 seats why no majority? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:01:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  SouthEast UK (EXC. LONDON) Tories control 92/102 seats why no majority? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SouthEast UK (EXC. LONDON) Tories control 92/102 seats why no majority?  (Read 1634 times)
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


« on: March 09, 2011, 03:25:12 PM »

You've largely answered your own question. Tories sweeping the board in the S/E is no big surprise and certainly no barometer for their popularity (a bit like claiming here in the N/E we're representative of Labour's popularity).  

But Refudiate's already put his finger on why they failed to win a majority: it's no good being popular in a minority of the country. They've managed to render themselves fairly unelectable in the North (sans typical rural seats), inner London, Scotland and Wales. Even with heavy swings in the Midlands and white-washes in their heartlands, it's not enough.

Perhaps these seat reductions which come at the expense of mainly non-Tory areas will readdress that - that's what they're hoping, anyway.
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2011, 04:30:23 PM »

Yep. Still the advantage of having less Labour seats to win, though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.