SENATE BILL: Do Not PM List Act (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 12:51:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Do Not PM List Act (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Do Not PM List Act (Law'd)  (Read 9648 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: March 11, 2011, 04:32:20 AM »
This is a long overdue if we are to refuse deregistration.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2011, 10:24:06 AM »
I'd like to offer an Amendment :


Do Not PM List Act

1. Any Atlasian explicitly asking for in the Census Bureau thread shall be registered by the Registrar General in a "Do not PM list".

2. The "Do not PM list" shall be visible in one of the opening posts of the Census Bureau thread.

3. Any Atlasian wishing to campaing through PMs is requested to read the "Do not PM list" before doing.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2011, 03:03:09 AM »
Quote from: Sinner Republican on March 12, 2011, 08:26:07 PM
Quote from: Good Uncle Muammar on March 12, 2011, 06:43:50 PM
Quote from: Sinner Republican on March 12, 2011, 02:28:32 PM
If you're going to make a law, at least make a punishment for not following the law.

Well, the whole point is not that "PM-ing these people is a crime", but rather "those people are not interested in Atlasia, and they are confirming, they don't want to be bothered".

Beside, how on earth are you going to prove PM-ing? Quotes? It's not impossible to forge a PM.

Exactly the reason this bill is a waste of time.

We're essentially passing a bill saying "We shouldn't bother people." It's common sense and not legislation worthy.

You totally miss the point of this law. We don't want to force people not to send PMs, what we want is that people know better who to PM and who not to PM.

Besides that, someone who PMs someone despite knowing he is in the no-PM list would be a total moron, as it's evident that he won't be able to convince him.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2011, 03:03:40 AM »
So, sponsor, do you accept my Amendment or not ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2011, 05:12:33 AM »

LOL Rowan. It looks like you only job in the Senate is to object to every Amendment just for the sake of complicating everything.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2011, 05:15:58 PM »
Quote from: bgwah on March 15, 2011, 03:40:59 PM
Quote from: Sinner Republican on March 15, 2011, 02:51:26 PM
Quote from: Senator Antonio V on March 15, 2011, 05:12:33 AM

LOL Rowan. It looks like you only job in the Senate is to object to every Amendment just for the sake of complicating everything.

When I objected to the amendment for the Feline bill, it ended up being voted down. If I had not spoken up, we would have passed an amendment that did not have majority support.

It was going to be further amended by Duke's amendment either way. Your "objection" ultimately didn't do anything.

...besides uselessly slowing the process.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2011, 05:24:31 PM »
Why the need to oppose everything just for the sake of "not rushing things" ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2011, 03:57:08 PM »
*facepalm*

Aye
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2011, 04:51:13 AM »
I'm desperately trying to understand the "nay" votes.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2011, 03:50:55 AM »

Good.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2011, 04:03:46 PM »
What the hell ? Huh

Nay
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #11 on: April 01, 2011, 03:14:51 AM »
For the record, I would also prefer deregistration by far.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2011, 07:17:20 AM »
Quote from: Dallasfan65 on April 01, 2011, 11:59:45 PM
Alright. Can a Senator sponsor something along these lines, then? (as an amendment)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What does it exactly change to the current bill ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2011, 02:04:10 PM »
The bill doesn't mandate for an extra post.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #14 on: April 06, 2011, 02:08:28 PM »
This Amendment is, as I said, unnecessary.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2011, 11:42:31 AM »
Nay
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #16 on: April 14, 2011, 03:23:19 PM »
Aye
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #17 on: April 20, 2011, 02:21:11 AM »
Quote from: bgwah on April 19, 2011, 03:32:17 PM
Quote from: Marokai Disaster on April 19, 2011, 06:55:09 AM
Meh. This has no teeth and subsequently is entirely useless. This is really the only alternative we have to formalized deregistration? The "We Would Appreciate it if You Don't PM These People" list?

I doubt this assault on freedom of speech could hold up in court anyway.

"assault on freedom of speech" ? LOL... Roll Eyes
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #18 on: April 20, 2011, 01:53:36 PM »
I honestly don't see how you can imagine to penalize a PM, which in theory shouldn't even made public. What could constitute a "proof" of infraction ? One can always put up a fake PM and pretend he has been "illegally PMed". No, that definitely makes no sense. Especially because, provided that campaigners acknowledge the no-PM-list, they would have no reason to PM those people, who probably will not even vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 12 queries.