State Changes in 2004
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 18, 2024, 10:03:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  State Changes in 2004
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: State Changes in 2004  (Read 6733 times)
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: March 25, 2004, 09:44:27 PM »

My vote went to Florida, although I probably should have put "other" since Bush is screwing New Hampshire (with his environmental policies, which are destroying NH's lakes).  Jeb can't screw the Democrats this time b/c we know the kind of bull that he pulls during his brother's election.  We are going to win this time.

His environmental policies don't have any effect here. We tend to overestimate the power of the issues, while in effect it is not a single issue that can turn a vote. Bush is seen as a phony here in NH, who is pushing his own agenda. We are still pretty undecided on Kerry though.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: March 25, 2004, 10:24:36 PM »


 I think FL is next because there could well be a massive turnout of ANGRY Floridian democrats this year.

No joke.  I agree.

I've said it before on this forum, and I'll say it again: Florida will come down to turnout.  The Panhandle Republicans will also come out en force.  It's going to be very very interesting.
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: March 25, 2004, 10:46:49 PM »



-Richardson best among 18-34 year-olds (72% FAVORABLE); worst among 35-49 year-olds (55% FAVORABLE to 24% UNFAVORABLE)

Man, how many politicians would kill for numbers like that...

Wow...thats amazing... still dont think he should be on the ticket though and looks like he doesnt want to be either...

Yes, there are probably better choices for VP out there. And, after all Richardson's said about how he's not going to run in 2004, he would face a bit of a firestorm in NM if he left now. I read somewhere that he wouldn't turn down a job as Secretary of State in a Kerry Administration... Smiley
Logged
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: March 25, 2004, 11:21:00 PM »

Ohio WILL NOT switch over in 2004. Ohio is a socially conservative state - it will outweigh any job loss.  Kerry can not win Ohio.  

Also:  I have this talk of Bush only won Ohio in 2000 because Kerry pulled his money out.  Well, when that happened, Bush withdrew alot as well.  It was not as if Bush was campaigning around the state every day.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,010


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: March 26, 2004, 01:15:25 AM »


 I think FL is next because there could well be a massive turnout of ANGRY Floridian democrats this year.

No joke.  I agree.

Well, these supposed mass numbers didn't turn out against Jeb.  I don't believe they exsist - Kerry will get the same votes Gore got in 2000 or less.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: March 26, 2004, 01:15:43 PM »

Given those choices:  NEW MEXICO.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/23/politics/campaign/23ECON.html
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,590
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: March 26, 2004, 02:17:41 PM »

Ohio WILL NOT switch over in 2004. Ohio is a socially conservative state - it will outweigh any job loss.  Kerry can not win Ohio.  

Also:  I have this talk of Bush only won Ohio in 2000 because Kerry pulled his money out.  Well, when that happened, Bush withdrew alot as well.  It was not as if Bush was campaigning around the state every day.

Ohio has picked the winner in every Presidential Election since 1964 (it went for Tricky Dicky in 1960).

Gore actually gave up on Ohio early on in the campaign... and Bush still didn't crack 50%
Logged
Rococo4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: March 26, 2004, 02:45:45 PM »

I meant Gore pulled out - not F. Kerry
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: April 16, 2004, 02:38:51 PM »


Playing the vorlon, huh?
Logged
ShapeShifter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: April 16, 2004, 02:39:49 PM »


No, actually someone started making new polls that were already cover, so I thought I would be nice to bump them back up.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: April 16, 2004, 02:41:30 PM »


No, actually someone started making new polls that were already cover, so I thought I would be nice to bump them back up.

Fair enough Smiley
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.