Post the map of an election between the two preceding posters

[Bacon King]

I remember a thread like this existing once, and it was pretty fun.

Gogogogogo!

[Insula Dei]

Only Oklahoma prefers a negative entity (R) to Bacon King (D).

[big bad fab]

Bacon King 310 - belgiansocialist 228

[Big Wiggly Style]

BBF vs. Belgiansocialist



BBF wins.

[Fuzzybigfoot]

BBF wins by a hair over JM (270-268).  Not sure what the state margins would be like.

[Big Wiggly Style]

This is generous to me
BBF wins by a hair over JM (270-268).  Not sure what the state margins would be like.

[Fuzzybigfoot]

This is generous to me
BBF wins by a hair over JM (270-268).  Not sure what the state margins would be like.

Well you could still pick up the West and NE by being socially liberal and pro-environment. 

[phk]

[Reaganfan]

Phknrocket1k: 385
Mr. Fuzzleton: 183

[opebo]

Naso way ahead of pnkroacket:
Naso dark blue at 305, pnkcroquette at 233, light blue:

[big bad fab]

Naso 353 - opebo 185

[big bad fab]

This is generous to me
BBF wins by a hair over JM (270-268).  Not sure what the state margins would be like.

Yeah, I'd win Florida, Virginia and NC and maybe Montana .

[Bacon King]

big bad fab: 332 EVs
Opebo: 216 EVs

Opebo manages to win in many socially liberal areas where his campaign is able to somewhat downplay his extremism; surprisingly, his "$15 an hour minimum wage" stance in addition to his extremely generous welfare ideas give Opebo's campaign unexpected support from the Rust Belt and other ailing areas in these tough economic times. Big bad fab still manages to coast to victory, however, completely routing Opebo in suburbs across the nation and earning complete support from evangelicals, who show up to the polls in droves in fear of being eaten by lions.

[RIP Robert H Bork]

Red is Bacon King, blue is big bad fab

[Hashemite]

Officepark defeats BK 292-246

[Teddy (IDS Legislator)]

officepark defeats hash



(put me in blue vs hash!)

[big bad fab]

(no way Hash would win Ohio and Michigan, and even PA, against officepark)



Teddy 309 - hash 229

Hash is surprisingly high, due to a strong support in traditionnally liberal areas, but also in "new" ones, in VA, NC, MT, ND, CO.
Generally speaking he is doing well in West and NW (it's so that he manages to win AK ! and he does a bit less badly among Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, SD than around the lower Mississipi),
but badly in the Middle East, in Michigan, even in Minnesota (which he loses very narrowly but for the same reasons as Michigan: a bad result among remaining blue-collars and among lower classes in general) and Illinois, though he manages to keep Wisconsin for some dozens of votes (university votes, probably ).
He loses NJ very narrowly. He loses NM due to not so good results among Hispanics.

A pretty surprising map, for a "classical" overall result.

An interesting map to do .

[Swedish Cheese]

What? Nobody said it had to be an American map...

BBF wins the traditionally centre-right parts of Sweden, as well as some agrarian swing districs who like him cause he's a farmer; Gotland, Kalmar, und so weiter. Teddy wins the swing districs of Malmö (completly urban, no farmer love) and Västra Götaland North (Big Automobil Industry)   

Teddy is red of course
BBF is blue

[white trash heroes]

[A-Bob]

I think there would be a lot of close states. SC would be able to play in some states in the west. GW would be able to hit it up in the rust belt (assuming the economy is in it's current state).

[Secretary Polnut]

I think I'm being generous to Ghostie here...



408-130

[Senator Ben]

285 - 253

[Reaganfan]

Ben - 521
Polnut -  17

[Secretary Polnut]

FWIW... I don't think I'd do that badly - I'd probably lose...but I think i'd take the west coast and Hawaii - and probably one or two MW States.

But this is an interesting match-up, the old-school Democrats versus Reaganfan, our resident nationalist.



Ben: 331
Naso: 207

I would expect a relatively successful left 3rd party candidacy here. The popular vote would be razor thin.

[A-Bob]

Regan wins a close one.