Post the map of an election between the two preceding posters

[big bad fab]

Bacon King 310 - belgiansocialist 228

[big bad fab]

Naso 353 - opebo 185

[big bad fab]

This is generous to me
BBF wins by a hair over JM (270-268).  Not sure what the state margins would be like.

Yeah, I'd win Florida, Virginia and NC and maybe Montana .

[big bad fab]

(no way Hash would win Ohio and Michigan, and even PA, against officepark)

Teddy 309 - hash 229

Hash is surprisingly high, due to a strong support in traditionnally liberal areas, but also in "new" ones, in VA, NC, MT, ND, CO.
Generally speaking he is doing well in West and NW (it's so that he manages to win AK ! and he does a bit less badly among Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, SD than around the lower Mississipi),
but badly in the Middle East, in Michigan, even in Minnesota (which he loses very narrowly but for the same reasons as Michigan: a bad result among remaining blue-collars and among lower classes in general) and Illinois, though he manages to keep Wisconsin for some dozens of votes (university votes, probably ).
He loses NJ very narrowly. He loses NM due to not so good results among Hispanics.

A pretty surprising map, for a "classical" overall result.

An interesting map to do .

[big bad fab]

Fallen Morgan 286
JBrase 252

Many Dems vote the "lesser of two evils", Fallen Morgan, except where "conservative Dems" are more numerous (hence PA, OH, IL).
"Liberals" of all kinds support Fallen Morgan.
GOPers are loyal to JBrase, which appear as a more "classical" candidate to them.

[big bad fab]

Narrow victory (277-261) for Snowstalker, able to grasp all the NE Dems, but also blue-collar voters, in OH and PA, despite A-Bob strength among all sorts of conservatives, including social ones (hence IA) and his SW regional stronghold (hence NV, NM and CO).