Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2014, 03:59:55 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results
| | |-+  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | | |-+  How did the following past third party voters vote?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: How did the following past third party voters vote?  (Read 1297 times)
Nichlemn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1344


View Profile
« on: April 08, 2011, 02:12:32 am »
Ignore

Break them down by Dem/GOP/Other. If Other is significant (e.g. a lot of Nader 2000 voters would have voted for him in 2008), break that down too.

Thurmond 1948
Wallace 1968
Anderson 1980
Perot 1992
Nader 2000
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6373
Spain


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2011, 09:21:58 am »
Ignore

thurmond - 95% GOP
wallace - 95% GOP
anderson - 70% Dem
Perot - 51% Dem
Nader 45% Other, 45% Dem
Logged

My evolution (by The Political Matrix):
E: -6.06 -> -6.97 -> -6.97 -> -8.13 -> -7.29 -> -8.26 -> -8.65 -> -7.03
S: -6.78 -> -6.09 -> -7.30 -> -7.13 -> -8.09 -> -8.35 -> -9.04 -> -8.61
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2250
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2011, 09:42:36 am »
Ignore

I always thought that Reagan got to 59 percent was by gaining all the Anderson voters in his camp.
Logged

Nichlemn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1344


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2011, 10:28:28 am »
Ignore

When I meant was e.g.

Thurmond:

McCain 95%
Obama 4%
Other 1%

Nader:

Obama: 45%
Nader: 30%
Other: 15%
McCain: 10%
Logged
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28741
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2011, 12:48:33 pm »
Ignore

Thurmond 1948 : 90% rep
Wallace 1968 : 90% rep
Anderson 1980 : 70% dem
Perot 1992 : 60% rep
Nader 2000 : 70% dem
Logged

Quote from: IRC
22:15   ComradeSibboleth   this is all extremely terrible and in all respects absolutely fycking dire.
Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8410
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2011, 01:48:38 pm »
Ignore

Thurmond - insufficient sample
Wallace - GOP 50%, Dem 35%, Oth 15% (remember that Wallace's strength was among urban whites)
Anderson - Dem 50%, GOP 30%, Oth 20%
Perot - GOP 50%, Dem 40%, Oth 10%
Nader - Oth 50%, Dem 40%, GOP 10%
Logged

feeblepizza
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3101
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2011, 03:53:40 pm »
Ignore

Obama winning 4% of Thurmond voters is extremely generous.
Logged

nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8715


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2011, 08:45:05 pm »
Ignore

Obama winning 4% of Thurmond voters is extremely generous.

Perhaps, but consider that since the voting age was 21 back then, so every living Thurmond voter in 2008 was at least 81. With such a small sample, and a potential for changing views from youth to old age, it's conceivable.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6373
Spain


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2011, 05:05:32 am »
Ignore

Robert Byrd problably voted Thurmon and Obama.
Logged

My evolution (by The Political Matrix):
E: -6.06 -> -6.97 -> -6.97 -> -8.13 -> -7.29 -> -8.26 -> -8.65 -> -7.03
S: -6.78 -> -6.09 -> -7.30 -> -7.13 -> -8.09 -> -8.35 -> -9.04 -> -8.61
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines