Rasmussen: Obama ties or leads all Republicans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:37:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Rasmussen: Obama ties or leads all Republicans		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen: Obama ties or leads all Republicans  (Read 724 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 13, 2011, 12:05:19 AM »
Obama vs. Huckabee: 43-43
Obama vs. Romney: 45-40
Obama vs. Paul: 42-34
Obama vs. Barbour: 42-34
Obama vs. Palin: 48-38
Obama vs. Pawlenty: 45-35
Obama vs. Huntsman: 42-31
Obama vs. Gingrich: 49-37
Obama vs. Daniels: 45-32
Obama vs. Cain: 43-25

The match-up surveys of 2,000 or 1,000 Likely Voters were conducted from March 6 - March 31, 2011 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error for surveys of 2,000 is +/- 2% with a 95% level of confidence; the margin of sampling error for surveys of 1,000 is +/- 3% with a 95% level of confidence.  Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/2012_presidential_matchups
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2011, 12:12:11 AM »
Quote from: Tender Branson on April 13, 2011, 12:05:19 AM
The match-up surveys of 2,000 or 1,000 Likely Voters were conducted from March 6 - March 31, 2011 by Rasmussen Reports.

Well, which is it, Scott?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2011, 12:13:04 AM »
Quote from: Charlton Heston on April 13, 2011, 12:12:11 AM
Quote from: Tender Branson on April 13, 2011, 12:05:19 AM
The match-up surveys of 2,000 or 1,000 Likely Voters were conducted from March 6 - March 31, 2011 by Rasmussen Reports.

Well, which is it, Scott?

Each match-up had either 1000 or 2000 likely voters.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2011, 12:14:04 AM »
Ah, so it wasn't one poll.  I guess the dates explain the lack of Trump.

Ayn Ron is now the 3rd strongest GOP candidate.  Huzzah!
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,178
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2011, 04:39:47 AM »
Quote from: Charlton Heston on April 13, 2011, 12:14:04 AM
Ah, so it wasn't one poll.  I guess the dates explain the lack of Trump.

Ayn Ron is now the 3rd strongest GOP candidate.  Huzzah!

     Given the current state of the GOP field, I suspect a baked ham could manage being the 3rd strongest GOP candidate. It seems like a very real possibility that Obama could be wildly unpopular on Election Day & still win just by facing a really poor opponent.
Logged
feeblepizza
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,910
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: -0.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2011, 08:45:18 AM »
Quote from: Charlton Heston on April 13, 2011, 12:14:04 AM
Ayn Ron is now the 3rd strongest GOP candidate.  Huzzah!
Thank God that the GOP is sane enough to not nominate him.
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2011, 09:36:22 PM »
Quote from: feeblepizza on April 13, 2011, 08:45:18 AM
Quote from: Charlton Heston on April 13, 2011, 12:14:04 AM
Ayn Ron is now the 3rd strongest GOP candidate.  Huzzah!
Thank God that the GOP is sane enough to not nominate him.

Yes, we wouldn't want someone with an actual chance of coming close to Obama, would we?

Now lets go nominate Palin, Gingrich, or T-Paw.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.