I think as long as you carry out your responsibilities according to the law as you interpret it...
I'm going to run elections and do my job based on the assumption that Governor Ghost_white is still in office because the Recall Amendment was never properly passed, making the recall invalid.
If someone wants to sue over this, because of the inherent conflict, I will likely refer the case to a member of the Atlasian Supreme Court or the CJO of another region for an impartial disposition. But I think I've made it pretty clear why I believe the Recall Amendment to have never been properly passed and I really don't really see any valid arguments to the contrary.
I suppose the conflict could be waived and I might be able to hear the case if the Lt. Governor agreed to name me CJO if the recall were deemed valid. My initial reading of the law can be wrong, and I'm willing to entertain arguments claiming the amendment was validly passed. In fact, I welcome this solution, as it would give clarity to the Constitution and end this potential constitutional crisis.
Lawsuits on anything else, including recent election happenings, are fair game for which I need not recuse myself.
