the reapportionment that never was (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 07:40:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  the reapportionment that never was (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: the reapportionment that never was  (Read 698 times)
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


« on: June 10, 2011, 01:29:37 AM »
« edited: June 10, 2011, 01:32:13 AM by His Excellency Chancellor Vazdul, Senator of Bedford Parish »

Using this:

http://www.demographia.com/db-state1900.htm

and this:

http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/SocialScience/ApportionmentApplet.shtml

and fiddling with the "modified divisor" until it gave me 435 seats, I came up with the following:

California +3
Michigan +2
Ohio +2
Connecticut +1
New Jersey +1
New Mexico +1
Texas +1
Washington +1
Indiana -1
Iowa -1
Kansas -1
Kentucky -1
Louisiana -1
Maine -1
Mississippi -1
Nebraska -1
New York -1
Virginia -1
Missouri -2

using the Huntington-Hill method. Now, I'm certainly not going to verify that one seat at a time, so take it with a grain of salt.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.