the reapportionment that never was (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:19:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  the reapportionment that never was (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: the reapportionment that never was  (Read 692 times)
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


« on: June 10, 2011, 06:42:38 PM »

In 1930, there was no difference in result.  In 1940, the difference was whether Arkansas would lose a seat or to Michigan would lose a seat or not.  In 1941, on a party-line vote, except for the Democrats from Michigan, Huntington-Hill was chosen.  Congress has used Huntington-Hill ever since.

Corrected.  Compare electoral vote totals in 1940 (1930's House apportionment + 2 EVs for the two Senators) and 1944 (1940's House apportionment + 2 EVs).  If Webster's method had been used Michigan would have had 20 EVs in 1944 instead of 19 and Arkansas would have had 8 EVs in 1944 instead of 9.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.