Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2014, 04:39:40 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: True Federalist, Former Moderate, Badger)
| | |-+  Rand Paul: criminalize speech.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Rand Paul: criminalize speech.  (Read 828 times)
Liberté
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 710
View Profile
« on: June 13, 2011, 05:13:32 am »
Ignore

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/05/31/232182/rand-paul-criminalize-speech/

Quote
PAUL: I’m not for profiling people on the color of their skin, or on their religion, but I would take into account where they’ve been traveling and perhaps, you might have to indirectly take into account whether or not they’ve been going to radical political speeches by religious leaders. It wouldn’t be that they are Islamic. But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that’s really an offense that we should be going after — they should be deported or put in prison.

If American politicians were logically consistent, and they aren't, the same guys that took offense (and rightfully so) for Sarah Palin having the blame for the Tucson shootings leveled at her would attack Paul on the same basis. But they won't.

I am and have always been skeptical of the Pauls, and this makes me more so now than ever.
Logged

The slave thinks he is free from bondage only to find another set of chains.
- Trent Reznor
Badger
badger
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9770
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2011, 09:05:09 am »

Quote
PAUL: I’m not for profiling people on the color of their skin, or on their religion, but


Nothing good can come of a statement starting like this.
Logged
Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30980
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2011, 09:13:48 am »
Ignore

"Liberty for the powerful, tyranny for the rest" is essentially people like Rand Paul's guiding motto.
Logged

RIP opebo
RIP the jfmtsc
RIP joshgreen
RIP King

Don't get me wrong, I love variety, and get a kick out of all these odors.
Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32656
Vatican City State
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2011, 11:12:51 am »
Ignore

Quote
PAUL: I’m not for profiling people on the color of their skin, or on their religion, but


Nothing good can come of a statement starting like this.

The statement is barely understandable.
Logged

In one thread -

« Last Edit: April 23, 2014, 11:45:57 pm by True Federalist »

« Last Edit: April 23, 2014, 11:43:45 pm by True Federalist »

« Last Edit: April 23, 2014, 11:41:31 pm by True Federalist »

-------------------------

Good call on the edit, Ernest.  We don't want the jailed mass murderer to call Dave on copyright infringement.
Badger
badger
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9770
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2011, 12:26:34 pm »

Quote
PAUL: I’m not for profiling people on the color of their skin, or on their religion, but


Nothing good can come of a statement starting like this.

The statement is barely understandable.

You, sir, are obviously an enemy of freedom and the Constitution. Angry
Logged
Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32656
Vatican City State
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2011, 02:15:15 pm »
Ignore

Quote
PAUL: I’m not for profiling people on the color of their skin, or on their religion, but


Nothing good can come of a statement starting like this.

The statement is barely understandable.

You, sir, are obviously an enemy of freedom and the Constitution. Angry

I know......but his core constituency understands him -



The Rubes.
Logged

In one thread -

« Last Edit: April 23, 2014, 11:45:57 pm by True Federalist »

« Last Edit: April 23, 2014, 11:43:45 pm by True Federalist »

« Last Edit: April 23, 2014, 11:41:31 pm by True Federalist »

-------------------------

Good call on the edit, Ernest.  We don't want the jailed mass murderer to call Dave on copyright infringement.
False Leftist
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5480
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2011, 04:33:40 pm »
Ignore

Uhh... Rand, you're supposed to be a libertarian, not a fascist.
Logged

Thanks guys!

As I said once I'd moderate not per the Terms of Service but the the Word of Jesus Christ.  For there is neither troll nor quality poster, neither banned nor unbanned, nor is there red avatar or blue avatar for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31977
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2011, 04:36:57 pm »
Ignore

Yelling fire in a crowded theater.

It doesn't criminalize speech.
Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Liberté
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 710
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2011, 04:40:59 pm »
Ignore

Yelling fire in a crowded theater.

It doesn't criminalize speech.

False analogy. "Yelling fire in a crowded theater" would only apply if, say, a sidewalk preacher were yelling about FEMA death camps in the middle of a New Orleans hurricane. This would be more akin to jailing people for listening to that sidewalk preacher discuss "Second Amendment solutions".
Logged

The slave thinks he is free from bondage only to find another set of chains.
- Trent Reznor
IDS Attorney General PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22343
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2011, 04:46:18 pm »
Ignore

     Yeah, this is rather ridiculous. Calling for the imprisonment of people who make speeches calling for the violent overthrow the government would be bad enough, but calling for the imprisonment of people who attend their speeches? Maybe he also thinks we should outlaw sedition again. Roll Eyes
Logged

J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31977
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2011, 05:55:47 pm »
Ignore

The "they" might be those people giving the speeches, not attending.  I really think that you should look at contacts in these cases.
Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Liberté
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 710
View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2011, 06:20:25 pm »
Ignore

The "they" might be those people giving the speeches, not attending.  I really think that you should look at contacts in these cases.

I will quote the pertinent part of Paul's statement:

Quote
But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that’s really an offense that we should be going after...

There is no room for equivocation on this issue. Paul not only supports outlawing 'sedition', in keeping with the great American tradition of Woodrow Wilson, but in outlawing attending speeches that promote 'sedition'. The former is bad enough; the latter is odious to any man who loves his freedom and wants to keep it. If Paul has his way (and there is no reason to expect he won't some time in the future), I will resist it with every measure of my ability to do so, and I'd advise others who are conscious of their rights as sovereign individuals to do the same.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2011, 06:24:34 pm by Liberté »Logged

The slave thinks he is free from bondage only to find another set of chains.
- Trent Reznor
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31977
United States


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2011, 06:39:21 pm »
Ignore

The "they" might be those people giving the speeches, not attending.  I really think that you should look at contacts in these cases.

I will quote the pertinent part of Paul's statement:

Quote
But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that’s really an offense that we should be going after...

There is no room for equivocation on this issue. Paul not only supports outlawing 'sedition', in keeping with the great American tradition of Woodrow Wilson, but in outlawing attending speeches that promote 'sedition'. The former is bad enough; the latter is odious to any man who loves his freedom and wants to keep it. If Paul has his way (and there is no reason to expect he won't some time in the future), I will resist it with every measure of my ability to do so, and I'd advise others who are conscious of their rights as sovereign individuals to do the same.

Or...

Quote
But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that’s really an offense that we should be going after...

I would take someone, not in the abstract, planning to violently overthrow the government, as being unprotected free speech.
Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Liberté
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 710
View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 13, 2011, 06:43:45 pm »
Ignore

I would take someone, not in the abstract, planning to violently overthrow the government, as being unprotected free speech.

Leaving aside the fact that you take it wrongly, why even mention anyone "attending speeches" if his intent is 'only' to arrest those giving the speeches? "(S)omeone attending speeches" ought never have been brought up if Paul's intent is only to clamp down on those actually doing the speechifying, which is pretty self-evidently not the case from the quotation in question.
Logged

The slave thinks he is free from bondage only to find another set of chains.
- Trent Reznor
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31977
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 13, 2011, 06:48:53 pm »
Ignore

I would take someone, not in the abstract, planning to violently overthrow the government, as being unprotected free speech.

Leaving aside the fact that you take it wrongly, why even mention anyone "attending speeches" if his intent is 'only' to arrest those giving the speeches? "(S)omeone attending speeches" ought never have been brought up if Paul's intent is only to clamp down on those actually doing the speechifying, which is pretty self-evidently not the case from the quotation in question.

He might be saying, we should be taking action against people that actively propose overthrowing the government, and we should look carefully at the associates of those people.  And yet, I think it is fine to look at "known contacts" of people (this from a guy who had dinner with a DA last week).
Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Liberté
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 710
View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 13, 2011, 06:57:56 pm »
Ignore

I would take someone, not in the abstract, planning to violently overthrow the government, as being unprotected free speech.

Leaving aside the fact that you take it wrongly, why even mention anyone "attending speeches" if his intent is 'only' to arrest those giving the speeches? "(S)omeone attending speeches" ought never have been brought up if Paul's intent is only to clamp down on those actually doing the speechifying, which is pretty self-evidently not the case from the quotation in question.

He might be saying, we should be taking action against people that actively propose overthrowing the government, and we should look carefully at the associates of those people.  And yet, I think it is fine to look at "known contacts" of people (this from a guy who had dinner with a DA last week).

In other words, you agree with me exactly: Rand's stated policy preferences are intended to curtail the freedom of speech and criminalize certain modes of political speech. You're simply aiming to soften the rhetorical blow against Paul. I can't let you do it.

Guilt by association is never fine; we've learned that through our long collective experience on the subject. Profiling is inherently an abrogation of an individual's liberty of action and of conscience. If I attend a rally by the Ku Klux Klan which calls for the violent overthrow of the ZOG, I remain well within my rights as long as I do not act out on that rhetoric. You confuse, as most security-Statists do, cause and effect: listening to "hate speech" does not motivate people to do anything. Those who already hold to an idea gravitate towards speakers who reinforce their ideas.

This is wrong. And you know it.
Logged

The slave thinks he is free from bondage only to find another set of chains.
- Trent Reznor
PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31147
Pitcairn


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2011, 08:26:07 am »
Ignore

Libertarian hero! Libertarian hero! Libertarian hero!
Logged

A Message to the People of France:

A Message to Manuel Valls
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21655
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2011, 08:47:59 am »
Ignore

This statement is taken a bit out of context, IMO. Though that does not make what Sen. Paul said any more or less correct.

I think what he was getting at was that we should not allow people to openly preach violence against the nation.

Now, I disagree with that statement and I believe that people should be allowed to say what they want, but Sen. Paul doesn't want to see acts of violence committed against his country, which is justifiable.
Logged

ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13296
United States


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 14, 2011, 06:55:10 pm »
Ignore

    Yeah, this is rather ridiculous. Calling for the imprisonment of people who make speeches calling for the violent overthrow the government would be bad enough, but calling for the imprisonment of people who attend their speeches? Maybe he also thinks we should outlaw sedition again. Roll Eyes
So much for Rand Paul being Libertarian...
Logged

America's like that hot chick everyone wants, and illegal immigrants are all the nerds that she should say "no" to.
Liberté
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 710
View Profile
« Reply #19 on: June 14, 2011, 07:06:31 pm »
Ignore

    Yeah, this is rather ridiculous. Calling for the imprisonment of people who make speeches calling for the violent overthrow the government would be bad enough, but calling for the imprisonment of people who attend their speeches? Maybe he also thinks we should outlaw sedition again. Roll Eyes
So much for Rand Paul being Libertarian...

I don't think anyone who sits down and seriously looks at the policies either Paul advocates can come to the logical position that either are libertarian in any real sense of the term. Both of them adhere far more closely to paleoconservatism. The problem is that paleoconservatism and libertarianism are so closely associated in the popular mind as to be indistinguishable. That said, I'd argue that the Paul pere is, ironically enough, much closer to being a legitimate libertarian than his son. I dislike Rand and I always have.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2011, 07:10:42 pm by Liberté »Logged

The slave thinks he is free from bondage only to find another set of chains.
- Trent Reznor
IDS Attorney General PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22343
United States


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 14, 2011, 11:17:58 pm »
Ignore

     Yeah, this is rather ridiculous. Calling for the imprisonment of people who make speeches calling for the violent overthrow the government would be bad enough, but calling for the imprisonment of people who attend their speeches? Maybe he also thinks we should outlaw sedition again. Roll Eyes
So much for Rand Paul being Libertarian...

I don't think anyone who sits down and seriously looks at the policies either Paul advocates can come to the logical position that either are libertarian in any real sense of the term. Both of them adhere far more closely to paleoconservatism. The problem is that paleoconservatism and libertarianism are so closely associated in the popular mind as to be indistinguishable. That said, I'd argue that the Paul pere is, ironically enough, much closer to being a legitimate libertarian than his son. I dislike Rand and I always have.

     Yeah, that's the issue. I could accept Rand Paul as being the most libertarian Senator that the state of Kentucky would probably ever dream of electing, but I'd rather not have this guy be treated as some sort of spokesman for the libertarian movement.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines