The Republican candidates
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:58:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Republican candidates
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: The Republican candidates  (Read 2213 times)
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 19, 2011, 09:50:17 PM »

People, people. Those comments (all of which are objectively correct) are not predictions. Unless the slump somehow ends, then an upset will always be at least possible. Plenty of laughably bad candidates have gone on to win elections.

Not U.S. Presidential Elections.



So not impossible. Though seemingly unlikely.

And which of the things in your OP fit the 1976 Jimmy Carter? He certainly wasn't a fraud (quite the opposite in fact), or a failure. Definitely not a nutter or a creep. And isn't virtually every career politician a hack to an extent? Oh, and obviously not the other three things either.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 19, 2011, 09:51:32 PM »

People, people. Those comments (all of which are objectively correct) are not predictions. Unless the slump somehow ends, then an upset will always be at least possible. Plenty of laughably bad candidates have gone on to win elections.

Not U.S. Presidential Elections.

Jimmy Carter was considered a pretty bad candidate and he won.  So was Bill Clinton in early 1992.

He was no worse than Ford.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 19, 2011, 09:52:32 PM »

Every non-incumbent presidential winner going back to 60 was considered a weak candidate at one point.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 19, 2011, 10:04:52 PM »

Every non-incumbent presidential winner going back to 60 was considered a weak candidate at one point.

And loser as well.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 19, 2011, 10:43:27 PM »

Let's be honest about this. And as fair as possible. And so on. And so forth. But...

They all suck, don't they? A dismal array of frauds, failures, nutters, creeps, hacks, idiots, swivel-eyed fanatics and the sort of people that you would not let within five feet of small children. And all of the above, obviously.

Yeah, wtf is up with this post.  Is he trying to be funny, but not offer any constructive criticism?  If you're a liberal, then you're just trolling. 
If you're an independent and just don't like the field, then vote for Obama, or is Obama doing something wrong. 
Otherwise start a write in campaign for Mitch Daniels, Al Gore, or Ralph Nader.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 20, 2011, 07:42:43 AM »

And which of the things in your OP fit the 1976 Jimmy Carter?

He didn't. But (and this is the point) he was a terrible candidate, but won anyway. Which demonstrates that it is at least possible under certain circumstances.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 14 queries.