Will the Homosexual Agenda become an important issue in 2012?

[King]

Moral precedent?  Most of these moral precedents actually violate the moral precedent set thousands of years ago in the Roman Empire.

Also, Joe's agenda: Only 7 hours of sleep a night? The agenda is appalling.

[King]

Define 'agenda'.

It means that there is a group of people who, although most of them are not homosexual, nevertheless want to force acceptance of it upon society for no other reason than to disrupt and destroy traditional values which have served people well for thousands of years.
 
Seriously, why else does the straight left push it so hard? Homosexuals are only a small fraction of the population, are there not a multitude of other issues the left could focus on besides securing the "rights" of 1% or 2% of the population?

The answer is that the left doesn't care about the 1% to 2% of the population, they care about degrading the values of the other 98% to 99%.

Define 'traditional values'

Concepts people have used to make decisions regarding other people and things in their everyday lives.

Do you really have to apply yourself to make the decision "do not marry another man" everyday?

[King]

Six pages of trolling, soon to be seven.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHqUipinDyw

[King]

Where do all these bigoted 20-year-olds live? I mean, I know I'm not necessarily representative of the average early twenty-something, but I go to a Catholic university, and even the College Republicans here are full of gays.

CJK probably was homeschooled and attends a community college if any at all.  That's the usual pattern I find in people who spend their days building conspiracies and over examining trivial issues.

[King]

CJK, you have friends over at Free Republic who share you're concern of being found "turned" gay:

http://fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=82238

[King]

Gays are 2% of the population? cite?

Its worth pointing out that even if that statistic were accurate (and no statistics on this issue ever will be), then that would still mean that the number in the U.S would be counted in millions.

Source

Another 2% is bisexual... and yes it's in the millions, but it's still in single digits, not the 1-10 Kinsey touted and certainly not the 1 in 4 people think it is.

20% of Americans not believing Obama was born in America /= 20% Obama was not born in America.

Stats don't always tell the truth.

[King]

People lie about this issue.  Bisexuals I would imagine especially so round themselves up to hetero.

[King]

And, of course, countries like Japan and South Korea have all of those nice trains and cities because they are overpopulated and not because their government invests in quality infrastructure.

[King]

And, of course, countries like Japan and South Korea have all of those nice trains and cities because they are overpopulated and not because their government invests in quality infrastructure.

They're Chinese. Point is that densely populated countries need not be like India.

And, yes, China also has a notoriously small government, too.

The United States is not set up to handle a billion people.  It could be, but it would go against our current cultural and political norms.  We're not a country of cheap labor or great infrastructure investment.  Our economy is actually built on the fact that our natural resources exceed the needs of the population.

A 300 million person nation with our unemployment rate is bad enough.  Multiple those people by three and we'll eat each other.